Splenic injury: Trends in evaluation and management

Karen J. Brasel, Christine M. DeLisle, Christine J. Olson, David C. Borgstrom

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

108 Scopus citations


Background: Changing methods of evaluating blunt abdominal trauma and expanding selection criteria for nonoperative management (NOM) of splenic injury can increase the number of patients managed nonoperatively without affecting success rates. Methods: The charts of 164 patients with blunt splenic injuries from July 1, 1991, to June 30, 1996, were reviewed. Thirty- eight patients were excluded because of immediate laparotomy without adjunctive tests or expiration in the resuscitative period. Injuries were graded according to the Organ Injury Scale. Results: Overall, successful NOM occurred in 84% of patients (73 of 87). NOM was successful in 5 of 7 patients >55 years old and in 14 of 15 patients with Glasgow Coma Scale scores < 13. Conclusion: Use of computed tomography increased NOM of splenic trauma from 11 to 71% during the 5-year period for injuries of equivalent severity. Age > 55 years or abnormal neurologic status should not preclude NOM, because success was related only to injury grade.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)283-286
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Issue number2
StatePublished - Feb 1998
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Splenic injury: Trends in evaluation and management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this