Spin in RCTs of anxiety medication with a positive primary outcome: A comparison of concerns expressed by the US FDA and in the published literature

Lian Beijers, Bertus F. Jeronimus, Erick H. Turner, Peter De Jonge, Annelieke M. Roest

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objectives This study aimed to determine the presence of spin in papers on positive randomised clinical trials (RCTs) of antidepressant medication for anxiety disorders by comparing concerns expressed in the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reviews with those expressed in the published paper. Methods For every positive anxiety medication trial with a matching publication (n=41), two independent reviewers identified the concerns raised in the US FDA reviews and those in the published literature. Spin was identified when concerns or limitations were expressed by the FDA (about the efficacy of the study drug) but not in the corresponding published paper. Concerns mentioned in the papers but not by the FDA were scored as â non-FDA' concerns. Findings Only six out of 35 (17%) of the FDA concerns pertaining to drug efficacy were reported in the papers. Two papers mentioned a concern that fit the FDA categories, but was not mentioned in the corresponding FDA review. Eighty-seven non-FDA concerns were counted, which often reflected general concerns or concerns related to the study design. Conclusions Results indicate the presence of substantial spin in the clinical trial literature on drugs for anxiety disorders. In papers describing RCTs on anxiety medication, the concerns raised by the authors differed from those raised by the FDA. Published papers mentioned a large number of generic concerns about RCTs, such as a lack of long-term research and limited generalisability, while they mentioned few concerns about drug efficacy. These results warrant the promotion of independent statistical review, reporting of patient-level data, more study of spin, and an increased expectation that authors report FDA concerns.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number012886
JournalBMJ open
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017

Keywords

  • Bias
  • Food Drug Administration
  • PSYCHIATRY
  • RCTs
  • Spin

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Spin in RCTs of anxiety medication with a positive primary outcome: A comparison of concerns expressed by the US FDA and in the published literature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this