Specialty Matters in the Treatment of Lung Cancer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The effect of surgeon volume, hospital volume, and surgeon specialty on operative outcomes has been reported in numerous studies. Short-term and long-term outcome comparisons for pulmonary resection for lung cancer have been performed between general surgeons (GS), cardiothoracic surgeons (CTS), and general thoracic surgeons (TS), using large administrative and inpatient databases. In the United States, general surgeons perform more pulmonary resection than thoracic surgeons. Studies have found that in cases involving thoracic surgeons, there is a lower operative mortality and morbidity, improved long-term survival, better adherence to established practice standards, and a lower cost compared with cases involving general surgeons. Some specific processes of care that account for these improved economic, operative, and oncological outcomes have been identified. Others are not yet specifically known and associated with specialization in thoracic surgery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)99-105
Number of pages7
JournalSeminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Lung Neoplasms
Thorax
Therapeutics
Surgeons
Lung
Thoracic Surgery
Inpatients
Economics
Databases
Morbidity
Costs and Cost Analysis
Mortality

Keywords

  • Lung cancer
  • Outcome
  • Specialty
  • Surgery
  • Treatment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Specialty Matters in the Treatment of Lung Cancer. / Tieu, Brandon; Schipper, Paul.

In: Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2012, p. 99-105.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{b8041c8e06bb49429070790e9b34476e,
title = "Specialty Matters in the Treatment of Lung Cancer",
abstract = "The effect of surgeon volume, hospital volume, and surgeon specialty on operative outcomes has been reported in numerous studies. Short-term and long-term outcome comparisons for pulmonary resection for lung cancer have been performed between general surgeons (GS), cardiothoracic surgeons (CTS), and general thoracic surgeons (TS), using large administrative and inpatient databases. In the United States, general surgeons perform more pulmonary resection than thoracic surgeons. Studies have found that in cases involving thoracic surgeons, there is a lower operative mortality and morbidity, improved long-term survival, better adherence to established practice standards, and a lower cost compared with cases involving general surgeons. Some specific processes of care that account for these improved economic, operative, and oncological outcomes have been identified. Others are not yet specifically known and associated with specialization in thoracic surgery.",
keywords = "Lung cancer, Outcome, Specialty, Surgery, Treatment",
author = "Brandon Tieu and Paul Schipper",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1053/j.semtcvs.2012.06.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "24",
pages = "99--105",
journal = "Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery",
issn = "1043-0679",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Specialty Matters in the Treatment of Lung Cancer

AU - Tieu, Brandon

AU - Schipper, Paul

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - The effect of surgeon volume, hospital volume, and surgeon specialty on operative outcomes has been reported in numerous studies. Short-term and long-term outcome comparisons for pulmonary resection for lung cancer have been performed between general surgeons (GS), cardiothoracic surgeons (CTS), and general thoracic surgeons (TS), using large administrative and inpatient databases. In the United States, general surgeons perform more pulmonary resection than thoracic surgeons. Studies have found that in cases involving thoracic surgeons, there is a lower operative mortality and morbidity, improved long-term survival, better adherence to established practice standards, and a lower cost compared with cases involving general surgeons. Some specific processes of care that account for these improved economic, operative, and oncological outcomes have been identified. Others are not yet specifically known and associated with specialization in thoracic surgery.

AB - The effect of surgeon volume, hospital volume, and surgeon specialty on operative outcomes has been reported in numerous studies. Short-term and long-term outcome comparisons for pulmonary resection for lung cancer have been performed between general surgeons (GS), cardiothoracic surgeons (CTS), and general thoracic surgeons (TS), using large administrative and inpatient databases. In the United States, general surgeons perform more pulmonary resection than thoracic surgeons. Studies have found that in cases involving thoracic surgeons, there is a lower operative mortality and morbidity, improved long-term survival, better adherence to established practice standards, and a lower cost compared with cases involving general surgeons. Some specific processes of care that account for these improved economic, operative, and oncological outcomes have been identified. Others are not yet specifically known and associated with specialization in thoracic surgery.

KW - Lung cancer

KW - Outcome

KW - Specialty

KW - Surgery

KW - Treatment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865350119&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865350119&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2012.06.002

DO - 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2012.06.002

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 99

EP - 105

JO - Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

JF - Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

SN - 1043-0679

IS - 2

ER -