Specialty Matters in the Treatment of Lung Cancer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

The effect of surgeon volume, hospital volume, and surgeon specialty on operative outcomes has been reported in numerous studies. Short-term and long-term outcome comparisons for pulmonary resection for lung cancer have been performed between general surgeons (GS), cardiothoracic surgeons (CTS), and general thoracic surgeons (TS), using large administrative and inpatient databases. In the United States, general surgeons perform more pulmonary resection than thoracic surgeons. Studies have found that in cases involving thoracic surgeons, there is a lower operative mortality and morbidity, improved long-term survival, better adherence to established practice standards, and a lower cost compared with cases involving general surgeons. Some specific processes of care that account for these improved economic, operative, and oncological outcomes have been identified. Others are not yet specifically known and associated with specialization in thoracic surgery.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)99-105
Number of pages7
JournalSeminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery
Volume24
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 30 2012

Keywords

  • Lung cancer
  • Outcome
  • Specialty
  • Surgery
  • Treatment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Specialty Matters in the Treatment of Lung Cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this