Spatial learning and memory in animal models and humans

Gwendolen E. Haley, Jacob Raber

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Spatial learning and memory requiring navigation has been widely assessed as a part of traditional rodent cognitive testing. Significantly fewer studies have examined spatial learning and memory requiring navigation in nonhuman primates and humans. While rodent spatial tasks utilize navigation and an allocentric frame of reference, nonhuman primate and human spatial tasks often utilize an egocentric frame of reference, lacking a navigational component. Due to this difference, cross species comparisons cannot be easily made. In rodent models, both spatial learning and memory and object recognition tasks requiring navigation are used to assess hippocampus-dependent learning and memory. Furthermore, addition of a spatial component to the traditional object recognition task in the mouse and human model has increased the sensitivity of the task to detect cognitive changes. Based on hippocampus-dependent cognitive tests used in our mouse studies, we developed spatial learning and memory tests requiring navigation for nonhuman primates (Spatial Foodport Maze) and humans (Memory Island) as well as the object recognition test Novel Image Novel Location (NINL) for humans. Here, we discuss these translational cognitive tests that are being used to bridge the gap between object recognition and spatial learning and memory tasks across species.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationNeuromethods
Pages91-109
Number of pages19
Volume50
DOIs
StatePublished - 2011

Publication series

NameNeuromethods
Volume50
ISSN (Print)08932336
ISSN (Electronic)19406045

Fingerprint

Animals
Animal Models
Data storage equipment
Object recognition
Navigation
Primates
Rodentia
Hippocampus
Islands
Spatial Memory
Spatial Learning
Learning
Recognition (Psychology)
Testing

Keywords

  • hippocampus
  • human
  • mice
  • nonhuman primate
  • Spatial learning and memory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)
  • Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics(all)
  • Neuroscience(all)
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Cite this

Haley, G. E., & Raber, J. (2011). Spatial learning and memory in animal models and humans. In Neuromethods (Vol. 50, pp. 91-109). (Neuromethods; Vol. 50). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-883-6_4

Spatial learning and memory in animal models and humans. / Haley, Gwendolen E.; Raber, Jacob.

Neuromethods. Vol. 50 2011. p. 91-109 (Neuromethods; Vol. 50).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Haley, GE & Raber, J 2011, Spatial learning and memory in animal models and humans. in Neuromethods. vol. 50, Neuromethods, vol. 50, pp. 91-109. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-883-6_4
Haley, Gwendolen E. ; Raber, Jacob. / Spatial learning and memory in animal models and humans. Neuromethods. Vol. 50 2011. pp. 91-109 (Neuromethods).
@inbook{48e0940ecfe84521ab6b40dd67869827,
title = "Spatial learning and memory in animal models and humans",
abstract = "Spatial learning and memory requiring navigation has been widely assessed as a part of traditional rodent cognitive testing. Significantly fewer studies have examined spatial learning and memory requiring navigation in nonhuman primates and humans. While rodent spatial tasks utilize navigation and an allocentric frame of reference, nonhuman primate and human spatial tasks often utilize an egocentric frame of reference, lacking a navigational component. Due to this difference, cross species comparisons cannot be easily made. In rodent models, both spatial learning and memory and object recognition tasks requiring navigation are used to assess hippocampus-dependent learning and memory. Furthermore, addition of a spatial component to the traditional object recognition task in the mouse and human model has increased the sensitivity of the task to detect cognitive changes. Based on hippocampus-dependent cognitive tests used in our mouse studies, we developed spatial learning and memory tests requiring navigation for nonhuman primates (Spatial Foodport Maze) and humans (Memory Island) as well as the object recognition test Novel Image Novel Location (NINL) for humans. Here, we discuss these translational cognitive tests that are being used to bridge the gap between object recognition and spatial learning and memory tasks across species.",
keywords = "hippocampus, human, mice, nonhuman primate, Spatial learning and memory",
author = "Haley, {Gwendolen E.} and Jacob Raber",
year = "2011",
doi = "10.1007/978-1-60761-883-6_4",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781607618829",
volume = "50",
series = "Neuromethods",
pages = "91--109",
booktitle = "Neuromethods",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Spatial learning and memory in animal models and humans

AU - Haley, Gwendolen E.

AU - Raber, Jacob

PY - 2011

Y1 - 2011

N2 - Spatial learning and memory requiring navigation has been widely assessed as a part of traditional rodent cognitive testing. Significantly fewer studies have examined spatial learning and memory requiring navigation in nonhuman primates and humans. While rodent spatial tasks utilize navigation and an allocentric frame of reference, nonhuman primate and human spatial tasks often utilize an egocentric frame of reference, lacking a navigational component. Due to this difference, cross species comparisons cannot be easily made. In rodent models, both spatial learning and memory and object recognition tasks requiring navigation are used to assess hippocampus-dependent learning and memory. Furthermore, addition of a spatial component to the traditional object recognition task in the mouse and human model has increased the sensitivity of the task to detect cognitive changes. Based on hippocampus-dependent cognitive tests used in our mouse studies, we developed spatial learning and memory tests requiring navigation for nonhuman primates (Spatial Foodport Maze) and humans (Memory Island) as well as the object recognition test Novel Image Novel Location (NINL) for humans. Here, we discuss these translational cognitive tests that are being used to bridge the gap between object recognition and spatial learning and memory tasks across species.

AB - Spatial learning and memory requiring navigation has been widely assessed as a part of traditional rodent cognitive testing. Significantly fewer studies have examined spatial learning and memory requiring navigation in nonhuman primates and humans. While rodent spatial tasks utilize navigation and an allocentric frame of reference, nonhuman primate and human spatial tasks often utilize an egocentric frame of reference, lacking a navigational component. Due to this difference, cross species comparisons cannot be easily made. In rodent models, both spatial learning and memory and object recognition tasks requiring navigation are used to assess hippocampus-dependent learning and memory. Furthermore, addition of a spatial component to the traditional object recognition task in the mouse and human model has increased the sensitivity of the task to detect cognitive changes. Based on hippocampus-dependent cognitive tests used in our mouse studies, we developed spatial learning and memory tests requiring navigation for nonhuman primates (Spatial Foodport Maze) and humans (Memory Island) as well as the object recognition test Novel Image Novel Location (NINL) for humans. Here, we discuss these translational cognitive tests that are being used to bridge the gap between object recognition and spatial learning and memory tasks across species.

KW - hippocampus

KW - human

KW - mice

KW - nonhuman primate

KW - Spatial learning and memory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957928098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77957928098&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-1-60761-883-6_4

DO - 10.1007/978-1-60761-883-6_4

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781607618829

VL - 50

T3 - Neuromethods

SP - 91

EP - 109

BT - Neuromethods

ER -