Spatial filter selection for EEG-based communication

Dennis J. McFarland, Lynn M. McCane, Stephen David, Jonathan R. Wolpaw

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

553 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Individuals can learn to control the amplitude of mu-rhythm activity in the EEG recorded over sensorimotor cortex and use it to move a cursor to a target on a video screen. The speed and accuracy of cursor movement depend on the consistency of the control signal and on the signal-to-noise ratio achieved by the spatial and temporal filtering methods that extract the activity prior to its translation into cursor movement. The present study compared alternative spatial filtering methods. Sixty-four channel EEG data collected while well-trained subjects were moving the cursor to targets at the top or bottom edge of a video screen were analyzed offline by four different spatial filters, namely a standard ear-reference, a common average reference (CAR), a small Laplacian (3 cm to set of surrounding electrodes) and a large Laplacian (6 cm to set of surrounding electrodes). The CAR and large Laplacian methods proved best able to distinguish between top and bottom targets. They were significantly superior to the ear-reference method. The difference in performance between the large Laplacian and small Laplacian methods presumably indicated that the former was better matched to the topographical extent of the EEG control signal. The results as a whole demonstrate the importance of proper spatial filter selection for maximizing the signal-to-noise ratio and thereby improving the speed and accuracy of EEG-based communication.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)386-394
Number of pages9
JournalElectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology
Volume103
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1997
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Electroencephalography
Signal-To-Noise Ratio
Ear
Electrodes

Keywords

  • Assistive communication
  • Electroencephalography
  • Mu rhythm
  • Operant conditioning
  • Prosthesis
  • Rehabilitation
  • Sensorimotor cortex

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Spatial filter selection for EEG-based communication. / McFarland, Dennis J.; McCane, Lynn M.; David, Stephen; Wolpaw, Jonathan R.

In: Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, Vol. 103, No. 3, 09.1997, p. 386-394.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

McFarland, Dennis J. ; McCane, Lynn M. ; David, Stephen ; Wolpaw, Jonathan R. / Spatial filter selection for EEG-based communication. In: Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 1997 ; Vol. 103, No. 3. pp. 386-394.
@article{5319429d892e4b1fbe6e8a97216e360f,
title = "Spatial filter selection for EEG-based communication",
abstract = "Individuals can learn to control the amplitude of mu-rhythm activity in the EEG recorded over sensorimotor cortex and use it to move a cursor to a target on a video screen. The speed and accuracy of cursor movement depend on the consistency of the control signal and on the signal-to-noise ratio achieved by the spatial and temporal filtering methods that extract the activity prior to its translation into cursor movement. The present study compared alternative spatial filtering methods. Sixty-four channel EEG data collected while well-trained subjects were moving the cursor to targets at the top or bottom edge of a video screen were analyzed offline by four different spatial filters, namely a standard ear-reference, a common average reference (CAR), a small Laplacian (3 cm to set of surrounding electrodes) and a large Laplacian (6 cm to set of surrounding electrodes). The CAR and large Laplacian methods proved best able to distinguish between top and bottom targets. They were significantly superior to the ear-reference method. The difference in performance between the large Laplacian and small Laplacian methods presumably indicated that the former was better matched to the topographical extent of the EEG control signal. The results as a whole demonstrate the importance of proper spatial filter selection for maximizing the signal-to-noise ratio and thereby improving the speed and accuracy of EEG-based communication.",
keywords = "Assistive communication, Electroencephalography, Mu rhythm, Operant conditioning, Prosthesis, Rehabilitation, Sensorimotor cortex",
author = "McFarland, {Dennis J.} and McCane, {Lynn M.} and Stephen David and Wolpaw, {Jonathan R.}",
year = "1997",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/S0013-4694(97)00022-2",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "103",
pages = "386--394",
journal = "Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology",
issn = "0013-4694",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Spatial filter selection for EEG-based communication

AU - McFarland, Dennis J.

AU - McCane, Lynn M.

AU - David, Stephen

AU - Wolpaw, Jonathan R.

PY - 1997/9

Y1 - 1997/9

N2 - Individuals can learn to control the amplitude of mu-rhythm activity in the EEG recorded over sensorimotor cortex and use it to move a cursor to a target on a video screen. The speed and accuracy of cursor movement depend on the consistency of the control signal and on the signal-to-noise ratio achieved by the spatial and temporal filtering methods that extract the activity prior to its translation into cursor movement. The present study compared alternative spatial filtering methods. Sixty-four channel EEG data collected while well-trained subjects were moving the cursor to targets at the top or bottom edge of a video screen were analyzed offline by four different spatial filters, namely a standard ear-reference, a common average reference (CAR), a small Laplacian (3 cm to set of surrounding electrodes) and a large Laplacian (6 cm to set of surrounding electrodes). The CAR and large Laplacian methods proved best able to distinguish between top and bottom targets. They were significantly superior to the ear-reference method. The difference in performance between the large Laplacian and small Laplacian methods presumably indicated that the former was better matched to the topographical extent of the EEG control signal. The results as a whole demonstrate the importance of proper spatial filter selection for maximizing the signal-to-noise ratio and thereby improving the speed and accuracy of EEG-based communication.

AB - Individuals can learn to control the amplitude of mu-rhythm activity in the EEG recorded over sensorimotor cortex and use it to move a cursor to a target on a video screen. The speed and accuracy of cursor movement depend on the consistency of the control signal and on the signal-to-noise ratio achieved by the spatial and temporal filtering methods that extract the activity prior to its translation into cursor movement. The present study compared alternative spatial filtering methods. Sixty-four channel EEG data collected while well-trained subjects were moving the cursor to targets at the top or bottom edge of a video screen were analyzed offline by four different spatial filters, namely a standard ear-reference, a common average reference (CAR), a small Laplacian (3 cm to set of surrounding electrodes) and a large Laplacian (6 cm to set of surrounding electrodes). The CAR and large Laplacian methods proved best able to distinguish between top and bottom targets. They were significantly superior to the ear-reference method. The difference in performance between the large Laplacian and small Laplacian methods presumably indicated that the former was better matched to the topographical extent of the EEG control signal. The results as a whole demonstrate the importance of proper spatial filter selection for maximizing the signal-to-noise ratio and thereby improving the speed and accuracy of EEG-based communication.

KW - Assistive communication

KW - Electroencephalography

KW - Mu rhythm

KW - Operant conditioning

KW - Prosthesis

KW - Rehabilitation

KW - Sensorimotor cortex

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031238784&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031238784&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0013-4694(97)00022-2

DO - 10.1016/S0013-4694(97)00022-2

M3 - Article

C2 - 9305287

AN - SCOPUS:0031238784

VL - 103

SP - 386

EP - 394

JO - Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology

JF - Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology

SN - 0013-4694

IS - 3

ER -