Sociodemographic characteristics and health related quality of life in men attending prostate cancer support groups

Dana Katz, Theresa Koppie, David Wu, Maxwell V. Meng, Gary D. Grossfeld, Natalia Sadesky, Deborah P. Lubeck, Peter R. Carroll

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: Prostate cancer can be associated with anxiety, depression and fears of recurrence and side effects of treatment. Support groups may help meet the needs of patients with cancer by providing treatment information and emotional support. We describe men in prostate cancer support groups and compare them to a national registry. Materials and Methods: Men attending prostate cancer support groups in the San Francisco Bay area completed a questionnaire including sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, health related quality of life items, satisfaction with treatment, relief of prostate cancer symptoms and bother from perceived side effects of treatment. Patients in support groups were compared to men enrolled in a national prostate cancer registry (Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urological Research Endeavor). Results: Men attending support groups had higher annual income and education levels, lower median serum prostate specific antigen and higher cancer grades than men in Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urological Research Endeavor. Clinical stage was comparable for the 2 groups. Men in support groups were satisfied with treatment and alleviation from symptoms. Adjusting for ethnicity, marital status, age and type of treatment, sexual function scores were higher in men who attended support groups (p = 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in bowel and urinary function between groups, although urinary function approached statistical significance at p = 0.05. Sexual and bowel bother scores indicated less bother for men in support groups (p ≤0.025). Conclusions: Men enrolled in support groups have unique sociodemographic characteristics. Their health related quality of life appears to be better than that of other men with prostate cancer. Whether this is related to support group participation is not known. Additional studies are required to determine whether routine support group participation improves outcomes in men with prostate cancer.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2092-2096
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume168
Issue number5
StatePublished - Nov 1 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Self-Help Groups
Prostatic Neoplasms
Quality of Life
Registries
Therapeutics
San Francisco
Marital Status
Prostate-Specific Antigen
Research
Fear
Neoplasms
Anxiety
Depression
Education
Recurrence

Keywords

  • Prostatic neoplasms
  • Quality of life
  • Self-help groups

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Cite this

Katz, D., Koppie, T., Wu, D., Meng, M. V., Grossfeld, G. D., Sadesky, N., ... Carroll, P. R. (2002). Sociodemographic characteristics and health related quality of life in men attending prostate cancer support groups. Journal of Urology, 168(5), 2092-2096.

Sociodemographic characteristics and health related quality of life in men attending prostate cancer support groups. / Katz, Dana; Koppie, Theresa; Wu, David; Meng, Maxwell V.; Grossfeld, Gary D.; Sadesky, Natalia; Lubeck, Deborah P.; Carroll, Peter R.

In: Journal of Urology, Vol. 168, No. 5, 01.11.2002, p. 2092-2096.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Katz, D, Koppie, T, Wu, D, Meng, MV, Grossfeld, GD, Sadesky, N, Lubeck, DP & Carroll, PR 2002, 'Sociodemographic characteristics and health related quality of life in men attending prostate cancer support groups', Journal of Urology, vol. 168, no. 5, pp. 2092-2096.
Katz D, Koppie T, Wu D, Meng MV, Grossfeld GD, Sadesky N et al. Sociodemographic characteristics and health related quality of life in men attending prostate cancer support groups. Journal of Urology. 2002 Nov 1;168(5):2092-2096.
Katz, Dana ; Koppie, Theresa ; Wu, David ; Meng, Maxwell V. ; Grossfeld, Gary D. ; Sadesky, Natalia ; Lubeck, Deborah P. ; Carroll, Peter R. / Sociodemographic characteristics and health related quality of life in men attending prostate cancer support groups. In: Journal of Urology. 2002 ; Vol. 168, No. 5. pp. 2092-2096.
@article{e08f432821744fb2a3952a3404208349,
title = "Sociodemographic characteristics and health related quality of life in men attending prostate cancer support groups",
abstract = "Purpose: Prostate cancer can be associated with anxiety, depression and fears of recurrence and side effects of treatment. Support groups may help meet the needs of patients with cancer by providing treatment information and emotional support. We describe men in prostate cancer support groups and compare them to a national registry. Materials and Methods: Men attending prostate cancer support groups in the San Francisco Bay area completed a questionnaire including sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, health related quality of life items, satisfaction with treatment, relief of prostate cancer symptoms and bother from perceived side effects of treatment. Patients in support groups were compared to men enrolled in a national prostate cancer registry (Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urological Research Endeavor). Results: Men attending support groups had higher annual income and education levels, lower median serum prostate specific antigen and higher cancer grades than men in Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urological Research Endeavor. Clinical stage was comparable for the 2 groups. Men in support groups were satisfied with treatment and alleviation from symptoms. Adjusting for ethnicity, marital status, age and type of treatment, sexual function scores were higher in men who attended support groups (p = 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in bowel and urinary function between groups, although urinary function approached statistical significance at p = 0.05. Sexual and bowel bother scores indicated less bother for men in support groups (p ≤0.025). Conclusions: Men enrolled in support groups have unique sociodemographic characteristics. Their health related quality of life appears to be better than that of other men with prostate cancer. Whether this is related to support group participation is not known. Additional studies are required to determine whether routine support group participation improves outcomes in men with prostate cancer.",
keywords = "Prostatic neoplasms, Quality of life, Self-help groups",
author = "Dana Katz and Theresa Koppie and David Wu and Meng, {Maxwell V.} and Grossfeld, {Gary D.} and Natalia Sadesky and Lubeck, {Deborah P.} and Carroll, {Peter R.}",
year = "2002",
month = "11",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "168",
pages = "2092--2096",
journal = "Journal of Urology",
issn = "0022-5347",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sociodemographic characteristics and health related quality of life in men attending prostate cancer support groups

AU - Katz, Dana

AU - Koppie, Theresa

AU - Wu, David

AU - Meng, Maxwell V.

AU - Grossfeld, Gary D.

AU - Sadesky, Natalia

AU - Lubeck, Deborah P.

AU - Carroll, Peter R.

PY - 2002/11/1

Y1 - 2002/11/1

N2 - Purpose: Prostate cancer can be associated with anxiety, depression and fears of recurrence and side effects of treatment. Support groups may help meet the needs of patients with cancer by providing treatment information and emotional support. We describe men in prostate cancer support groups and compare them to a national registry. Materials and Methods: Men attending prostate cancer support groups in the San Francisco Bay area completed a questionnaire including sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, health related quality of life items, satisfaction with treatment, relief of prostate cancer symptoms and bother from perceived side effects of treatment. Patients in support groups were compared to men enrolled in a national prostate cancer registry (Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urological Research Endeavor). Results: Men attending support groups had higher annual income and education levels, lower median serum prostate specific antigen and higher cancer grades than men in Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urological Research Endeavor. Clinical stage was comparable for the 2 groups. Men in support groups were satisfied with treatment and alleviation from symptoms. Adjusting for ethnicity, marital status, age and type of treatment, sexual function scores were higher in men who attended support groups (p = 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in bowel and urinary function between groups, although urinary function approached statistical significance at p = 0.05. Sexual and bowel bother scores indicated less bother for men in support groups (p ≤0.025). Conclusions: Men enrolled in support groups have unique sociodemographic characteristics. Their health related quality of life appears to be better than that of other men with prostate cancer. Whether this is related to support group participation is not known. Additional studies are required to determine whether routine support group participation improves outcomes in men with prostate cancer.

AB - Purpose: Prostate cancer can be associated with anxiety, depression and fears of recurrence and side effects of treatment. Support groups may help meet the needs of patients with cancer by providing treatment information and emotional support. We describe men in prostate cancer support groups and compare them to a national registry. Materials and Methods: Men attending prostate cancer support groups in the San Francisco Bay area completed a questionnaire including sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, health related quality of life items, satisfaction with treatment, relief of prostate cancer symptoms and bother from perceived side effects of treatment. Patients in support groups were compared to men enrolled in a national prostate cancer registry (Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urological Research Endeavor). Results: Men attending support groups had higher annual income and education levels, lower median serum prostate specific antigen and higher cancer grades than men in Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urological Research Endeavor. Clinical stage was comparable for the 2 groups. Men in support groups were satisfied with treatment and alleviation from symptoms. Adjusting for ethnicity, marital status, age and type of treatment, sexual function scores were higher in men who attended support groups (p = 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in bowel and urinary function between groups, although urinary function approached statistical significance at p = 0.05. Sexual and bowel bother scores indicated less bother for men in support groups (p ≤0.025). Conclusions: Men enrolled in support groups have unique sociodemographic characteristics. Their health related quality of life appears to be better than that of other men with prostate cancer. Whether this is related to support group participation is not known. Additional studies are required to determine whether routine support group participation improves outcomes in men with prostate cancer.

KW - Prostatic neoplasms

KW - Quality of life

KW - Self-help groups

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036837446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036837446&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 12394716

AN - SCOPUS:0036837446

VL - 168

SP - 2092

EP - 2096

JO - Journal of Urology

JF - Journal of Urology

SN - 0022-5347

IS - 5

ER -