Social reward and empathy as proximal contributions to altruism

The camaraderie effect

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Natural selection favors individuals to act in their own interests, implying that wild animals experience a competitive psychology. Animals in the wild also express helping behaviors, presumably at their own expense and suggestive of a more compassionate psychology. This apparent paradox can be partially explained by ultimate mechanisms that include kin selection, reciprocity, and multilevel selection, yet some theorists argue such ultimate explanations may not be sufficient and that an additional “stake in others” is necessary for altruism’s evolution. We suggest this stake is the “camaraderie effect,” a by-product of two highly adaptive psychological experiences: social motivation and empathy. Rodents can derive pleasure from access to others and this appetite for social rewards motivates individuals to live together, a valuable psychology when group living is adaptive. Rodents can also experience empathy, the generation of an affective state more appropriate to the situation of another compared to one’s own. Empathy is not a compassionate feeling but it has useful predictive value. For instance, empathy allows an individual to feel an unperceived danger from social cues. Empathy of another’s stance toward one’s self would predict either social acceptance or ostracism and amplify one’s physiological sensitivity to social isolation, including impaired immune responses and delayed wound healing. By contrast, altruistic behaviors would promote well-being in others and feelings of camaraderie from others, thereby improving one’s own physiological well-being. Together, these affective states engender a stake in others necessary for the expression of altruistic behavior.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationCurrent Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences
PublisherSpringer Verlag
Pages127-157
Number of pages31
Volume30
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Publication series

NameCurrent Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences
Volume30
ISSN (Print)18663370
ISSN (Electronic)18663389

Fingerprint

Altruism
Reward
Psychology
Wild Animals
Rodentia
Emotions
Helping Behavior
Social Distance
Social Isolation
Pleasure
Ego
Genetic Selection
Appetite
Wound Healing
Cues
Motivation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Lahvis, G. (2016). Social reward and empathy as proximal contributions to altruism: The camaraderie effect. In Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences (Vol. 30, pp. 127-157). (Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences; Vol. 30). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/7854_2016_449

Social reward and empathy as proximal contributions to altruism : The camaraderie effect. / Lahvis, Garet.

Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences. Vol. 30 Springer Verlag, 2016. p. 127-157 (Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences; Vol. 30).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Lahvis, G 2016, Social reward and empathy as proximal contributions to altruism: The camaraderie effect. in Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences. vol. 30, Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences, vol. 30, Springer Verlag, pp. 127-157. https://doi.org/10.1007/7854_2016_449
Lahvis G. Social reward and empathy as proximal contributions to altruism: The camaraderie effect. In Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences. Vol. 30. Springer Verlag. 2016. p. 127-157. (Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences). https://doi.org/10.1007/7854_2016_449
Lahvis, Garet. / Social reward and empathy as proximal contributions to altruism : The camaraderie effect. Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences. Vol. 30 Springer Verlag, 2016. pp. 127-157 (Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences).
@inbook{ba5086681cd649ff8675da3829108ace,
title = "Social reward and empathy as proximal contributions to altruism: The camaraderie effect",
abstract = "Natural selection favors individuals to act in their own interests, implying that wild animals experience a competitive psychology. Animals in the wild also express helping behaviors, presumably at their own expense and suggestive of a more compassionate psychology. This apparent paradox can be partially explained by ultimate mechanisms that include kin selection, reciprocity, and multilevel selection, yet some theorists argue such ultimate explanations may not be sufficient and that an additional “stake in others” is necessary for altruism’s evolution. We suggest this stake is the “camaraderie effect,” a by-product of two highly adaptive psychological experiences: social motivation and empathy. Rodents can derive pleasure from access to others and this appetite for social rewards motivates individuals to live together, a valuable psychology when group living is adaptive. Rodents can also experience empathy, the generation of an affective state more appropriate to the situation of another compared to one’s own. Empathy is not a compassionate feeling but it has useful predictive value. For instance, empathy allows an individual to feel an unperceived danger from social cues. Empathy of another’s stance toward one’s self would predict either social acceptance or ostracism and amplify one’s physiological sensitivity to social isolation, including impaired immune responses and delayed wound healing. By contrast, altruistic behaviors would promote well-being in others and feelings of camaraderie from others, thereby improving one’s own physiological well-being. Together, these affective states engender a stake in others necessary for the expression of altruistic behavior.",
author = "Garet Lahvis",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1007/7854_2016_449",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
series = "Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
pages = "127--157",
booktitle = "Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Social reward and empathy as proximal contributions to altruism

T2 - The camaraderie effect

AU - Lahvis, Garet

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - Natural selection favors individuals to act in their own interests, implying that wild animals experience a competitive psychology. Animals in the wild also express helping behaviors, presumably at their own expense and suggestive of a more compassionate psychology. This apparent paradox can be partially explained by ultimate mechanisms that include kin selection, reciprocity, and multilevel selection, yet some theorists argue such ultimate explanations may not be sufficient and that an additional “stake in others” is necessary for altruism’s evolution. We suggest this stake is the “camaraderie effect,” a by-product of two highly adaptive psychological experiences: social motivation and empathy. Rodents can derive pleasure from access to others and this appetite for social rewards motivates individuals to live together, a valuable psychology when group living is adaptive. Rodents can also experience empathy, the generation of an affective state more appropriate to the situation of another compared to one’s own. Empathy is not a compassionate feeling but it has useful predictive value. For instance, empathy allows an individual to feel an unperceived danger from social cues. Empathy of another’s stance toward one’s self would predict either social acceptance or ostracism and amplify one’s physiological sensitivity to social isolation, including impaired immune responses and delayed wound healing. By contrast, altruistic behaviors would promote well-being in others and feelings of camaraderie from others, thereby improving one’s own physiological well-being. Together, these affective states engender a stake in others necessary for the expression of altruistic behavior.

AB - Natural selection favors individuals to act in their own interests, implying that wild animals experience a competitive psychology. Animals in the wild also express helping behaviors, presumably at their own expense and suggestive of a more compassionate psychology. This apparent paradox can be partially explained by ultimate mechanisms that include kin selection, reciprocity, and multilevel selection, yet some theorists argue such ultimate explanations may not be sufficient and that an additional “stake in others” is necessary for altruism’s evolution. We suggest this stake is the “camaraderie effect,” a by-product of two highly adaptive psychological experiences: social motivation and empathy. Rodents can derive pleasure from access to others and this appetite for social rewards motivates individuals to live together, a valuable psychology when group living is adaptive. Rodents can also experience empathy, the generation of an affective state more appropriate to the situation of another compared to one’s own. Empathy is not a compassionate feeling but it has useful predictive value. For instance, empathy allows an individual to feel an unperceived danger from social cues. Empathy of another’s stance toward one’s self would predict either social acceptance or ostracism and amplify one’s physiological sensitivity to social isolation, including impaired immune responses and delayed wound healing. By contrast, altruistic behaviors would promote well-being in others and feelings of camaraderie from others, thereby improving one’s own physiological well-being. Together, these affective states engender a stake in others necessary for the expression of altruistic behavior.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013782433&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85013782433&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/7854_2016_449

DO - 10.1007/7854_2016_449

M3 - Chapter

VL - 30

T3 - Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences

SP - 127

EP - 157

BT - Current Topics in Behavioral Neurosciences

PB - Springer Verlag

ER -