Smoking-Cessation Assistance: Before and After Stage 1 Meaningful Use Implementation

Steffani Bailey, John Heintzman, Miguel Marino, R. Lorie Jacob, Jon E. Puro, Jennifer Devoe, Tim E. Burdick, Brian L. Hazlehurst, Deborah Cohen, Stephen P. Fortmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Brief smoking-cessation interventions in primary care settings are effective, but delivery of these services remains low. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' Meaningful Use (MU) of Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program could increase rates of smoking assessment and cessation assistance among vulnerable populations. This study examined whether smoking status assessment, cessation assistance, and odds of being a current smoker changed after Stage 1 MU implementation. Methods: EHR data were extracted from 26 community health centers with an EHR in place by June 15, 2009. AORs were computed for each binary outcome (smoking status assessment, counseling given, smoking-cessation medications ordered/discussed, current smoking status), comparing 2010 (pre-MU), 2012 (MU preparation), and 2014 (MU fully implemented) for pregnant and non-pregnant patients. Results: Non-pregnant patients had decreased odds of current smoking over time; odds for all other outcomes increased except for medication orders from 2010 to 2012. Among pregnant patients, odds of assessment and counseling increased across all years. Odds of discussing or ordering of cessation medications increased from 2010 compared with the other 2 study years; however, medication orders alone did not change over time, and current smoking only decreased from 2010 to 2012. Compared with non-pregnant patients, a lower percentage of pregnant patients were provided counseling. Conclusions: Findings suggest that incentives for MU of EHRs increase the odds of smoking assessment and cessation assistance, which could lead to decreased smoking rates among vulnerable populations. Continued efforts for provision of cessation assistance among pregnant patients is warranted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2017

Fingerprint

Smoking Cessation
Smoking
Electronic Health Records
Counseling
Vulnerable Populations
Motivation
Community Health Centers
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (U.S.)
Primary Health Care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Smoking-Cessation Assistance : Before and After Stage 1 Meaningful Use Implementation. / Bailey, Steffani; Heintzman, John; Marino, Miguel; Jacob, R. Lorie; Puro, Jon E.; Devoe, Jennifer; Burdick, Tim E.; Hazlehurst, Brian L.; Cohen, Deborah; Fortmann, Stephen P.

In: American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2017.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e3aeab459a90457d98bc3006d6852ffa,
title = "Smoking-Cessation Assistance: Before and After Stage 1 Meaningful Use Implementation",
abstract = "Introduction: Brief smoking-cessation interventions in primary care settings are effective, but delivery of these services remains low. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' Meaningful Use (MU) of Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program could increase rates of smoking assessment and cessation assistance among vulnerable populations. This study examined whether smoking status assessment, cessation assistance, and odds of being a current smoker changed after Stage 1 MU implementation. Methods: EHR data were extracted from 26 community health centers with an EHR in place by June 15, 2009. AORs were computed for each binary outcome (smoking status assessment, counseling given, smoking-cessation medications ordered/discussed, current smoking status), comparing 2010 (pre-MU), 2012 (MU preparation), and 2014 (MU fully implemented) for pregnant and non-pregnant patients. Results: Non-pregnant patients had decreased odds of current smoking over time; odds for all other outcomes increased except for medication orders from 2010 to 2012. Among pregnant patients, odds of assessment and counseling increased across all years. Odds of discussing or ordering of cessation medications increased from 2010 compared with the other 2 study years; however, medication orders alone did not change over time, and current smoking only decreased from 2010 to 2012. Compared with non-pregnant patients, a lower percentage of pregnant patients were provided counseling. Conclusions: Findings suggest that incentives for MU of EHRs increase the odds of smoking assessment and cessation assistance, which could lead to decreased smoking rates among vulnerable populations. Continued efforts for provision of cessation assistance among pregnant patients is warranted.",
author = "Steffani Bailey and John Heintzman and Miguel Marino and Jacob, {R. Lorie} and Puro, {Jon E.} and Jennifer Devoe and Burdick, {Tim E.} and Hazlehurst, {Brian L.} and Deborah Cohen and Fortmann, {Stephen P.}",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1016/j.amepre.2017.02.006",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "American Journal of Preventive Medicine",
issn = "0749-3797",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Smoking-Cessation Assistance

T2 - Before and After Stage 1 Meaningful Use Implementation

AU - Bailey, Steffani

AU - Heintzman, John

AU - Marino, Miguel

AU - Jacob, R. Lorie

AU - Puro, Jon E.

AU - Devoe, Jennifer

AU - Burdick, Tim E.

AU - Hazlehurst, Brian L.

AU - Cohen, Deborah

AU - Fortmann, Stephen P.

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Introduction: Brief smoking-cessation interventions in primary care settings are effective, but delivery of these services remains low. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' Meaningful Use (MU) of Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program could increase rates of smoking assessment and cessation assistance among vulnerable populations. This study examined whether smoking status assessment, cessation assistance, and odds of being a current smoker changed after Stage 1 MU implementation. Methods: EHR data were extracted from 26 community health centers with an EHR in place by June 15, 2009. AORs were computed for each binary outcome (smoking status assessment, counseling given, smoking-cessation medications ordered/discussed, current smoking status), comparing 2010 (pre-MU), 2012 (MU preparation), and 2014 (MU fully implemented) for pregnant and non-pregnant patients. Results: Non-pregnant patients had decreased odds of current smoking over time; odds for all other outcomes increased except for medication orders from 2010 to 2012. Among pregnant patients, odds of assessment and counseling increased across all years. Odds of discussing or ordering of cessation medications increased from 2010 compared with the other 2 study years; however, medication orders alone did not change over time, and current smoking only decreased from 2010 to 2012. Compared with non-pregnant patients, a lower percentage of pregnant patients were provided counseling. Conclusions: Findings suggest that incentives for MU of EHRs increase the odds of smoking assessment and cessation assistance, which could lead to decreased smoking rates among vulnerable populations. Continued efforts for provision of cessation assistance among pregnant patients is warranted.

AB - Introduction: Brief smoking-cessation interventions in primary care settings are effective, but delivery of these services remains low. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' Meaningful Use (MU) of Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program could increase rates of smoking assessment and cessation assistance among vulnerable populations. This study examined whether smoking status assessment, cessation assistance, and odds of being a current smoker changed after Stage 1 MU implementation. Methods: EHR data were extracted from 26 community health centers with an EHR in place by June 15, 2009. AORs were computed for each binary outcome (smoking status assessment, counseling given, smoking-cessation medications ordered/discussed, current smoking status), comparing 2010 (pre-MU), 2012 (MU preparation), and 2014 (MU fully implemented) for pregnant and non-pregnant patients. Results: Non-pregnant patients had decreased odds of current smoking over time; odds for all other outcomes increased except for medication orders from 2010 to 2012. Among pregnant patients, odds of assessment and counseling increased across all years. Odds of discussing or ordering of cessation medications increased from 2010 compared with the other 2 study years; however, medication orders alone did not change over time, and current smoking only decreased from 2010 to 2012. Compared with non-pregnant patients, a lower percentage of pregnant patients were provided counseling. Conclusions: Findings suggest that incentives for MU of EHRs increase the odds of smoking assessment and cessation assistance, which could lead to decreased smoking rates among vulnerable populations. Continued efforts for provision of cessation assistance among pregnant patients is warranted.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016639104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016639104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.02.006

DO - 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.02.006

M3 - Article

C2 - 28365090

AN - SCOPUS:85016639104

JO - American Journal of Preventive Medicine

JF - American Journal of Preventive Medicine

SN - 0749-3797

ER -