Skull base tumor volume and surgical margins

A pilot study

C. Schwimmer, Jane Weissman, A. M. Simon, I. P. Janecka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The relationship between preoperative assessment of tumor volume and oncologic adequacy of surgical margins was studied retrospectively. Our hypothesis was that the risk of inadequate, or positive, margins would rise with increasing tumor volume and that this would adversely affect survival. We anticipated that limitations of surgical approaches used until 1988 would be reflected in an increasing proportion of positive margins with increasing tumor volume. We conducted a pilot study of 25 patients with malignant tumors of the anterolateral cranial base operated on at the University of Pittsburgh Center for Cranial Base Surgery between 1987 and 1988. Preoperative computed tomography assessment of tumor volume was performed in all patients, and correlation between tumor volume, surgical margins, and survival was examined. Follow-up interval averaged 31.7 months. Twelve histologic tumor types were represented, with squamous cell carcinoma the most common (eight patients [32%]). Tumor volume ranged from 0.9 to 390 cc, with a median of 48 cc. Based on a median split of tumor volumes, patients were classified as high volume (more than 48 cc) or low volume (less than 48 cc). Of patients in the high volume group, 92% were found to have positive surgical margins, whereas only 50% of patients in the low volume group had positive margins. Analysis of the effect of tumor volume and surgical margins on survival was limited by sample size constraints, but both high-tumor volume and positives margins tended to reduce patient survival.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)93-96
Number of pages4
JournalSkull Base Surgery
Volume5
Issue number2
StatePublished - 1995
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Skull Base
Tumor Burden
Survival
Margins of Excision
Sample Size
Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Neoplasms
Tomography

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Schwimmer, C., Weissman, J., Simon, A. M., & Janecka, I. P. (1995). Skull base tumor volume and surgical margins: A pilot study. Skull Base Surgery, 5(2), 93-96.

Skull base tumor volume and surgical margins : A pilot study. / Schwimmer, C.; Weissman, Jane; Simon, A. M.; Janecka, I. P.

In: Skull Base Surgery, Vol. 5, No. 2, 1995, p. 93-96.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Schwimmer, C, Weissman, J, Simon, AM & Janecka, IP 1995, 'Skull base tumor volume and surgical margins: A pilot study', Skull Base Surgery, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 93-96.
Schwimmer C, Weissman J, Simon AM, Janecka IP. Skull base tumor volume and surgical margins: A pilot study. Skull Base Surgery. 1995;5(2):93-96.
Schwimmer, C. ; Weissman, Jane ; Simon, A. M. ; Janecka, I. P. / Skull base tumor volume and surgical margins : A pilot study. In: Skull Base Surgery. 1995 ; Vol. 5, No. 2. pp. 93-96.
@article{f997331302b24921af48b4f81418dd3a,
title = "Skull base tumor volume and surgical margins: A pilot study",
abstract = "The relationship between preoperative assessment of tumor volume and oncologic adequacy of surgical margins was studied retrospectively. Our hypothesis was that the risk of inadequate, or positive, margins would rise with increasing tumor volume and that this would adversely affect survival. We anticipated that limitations of surgical approaches used until 1988 would be reflected in an increasing proportion of positive margins with increasing tumor volume. We conducted a pilot study of 25 patients with malignant tumors of the anterolateral cranial base operated on at the University of Pittsburgh Center for Cranial Base Surgery between 1987 and 1988. Preoperative computed tomography assessment of tumor volume was performed in all patients, and correlation between tumor volume, surgical margins, and survival was examined. Follow-up interval averaged 31.7 months. Twelve histologic tumor types were represented, with squamous cell carcinoma the most common (eight patients [32{\%}]). Tumor volume ranged from 0.9 to 390 cc, with a median of 48 cc. Based on a median split of tumor volumes, patients were classified as high volume (more than 48 cc) or low volume (less than 48 cc). Of patients in the high volume group, 92{\%} were found to have positive surgical margins, whereas only 50{\%} of patients in the low volume group had positive margins. Analysis of the effect of tumor volume and surgical margins on survival was limited by sample size constraints, but both high-tumor volume and positives margins tended to reduce patient survival.",
author = "C. Schwimmer and Jane Weissman and Simon, {A. M.} and Janecka, {I. P.}",
year = "1995",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "93--96",
journal = "Journal of Neurological Surgery, Part B: Skull Base",
issn = "2193-6331",
publisher = "Thieme Medical Publishers",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Skull base tumor volume and surgical margins

T2 - A pilot study

AU - Schwimmer, C.

AU - Weissman, Jane

AU - Simon, A. M.

AU - Janecka, I. P.

PY - 1995

Y1 - 1995

N2 - The relationship between preoperative assessment of tumor volume and oncologic adequacy of surgical margins was studied retrospectively. Our hypothesis was that the risk of inadequate, or positive, margins would rise with increasing tumor volume and that this would adversely affect survival. We anticipated that limitations of surgical approaches used until 1988 would be reflected in an increasing proportion of positive margins with increasing tumor volume. We conducted a pilot study of 25 patients with malignant tumors of the anterolateral cranial base operated on at the University of Pittsburgh Center for Cranial Base Surgery between 1987 and 1988. Preoperative computed tomography assessment of tumor volume was performed in all patients, and correlation between tumor volume, surgical margins, and survival was examined. Follow-up interval averaged 31.7 months. Twelve histologic tumor types were represented, with squamous cell carcinoma the most common (eight patients [32%]). Tumor volume ranged from 0.9 to 390 cc, with a median of 48 cc. Based on a median split of tumor volumes, patients were classified as high volume (more than 48 cc) or low volume (less than 48 cc). Of patients in the high volume group, 92% were found to have positive surgical margins, whereas only 50% of patients in the low volume group had positive margins. Analysis of the effect of tumor volume and surgical margins on survival was limited by sample size constraints, but both high-tumor volume and positives margins tended to reduce patient survival.

AB - The relationship between preoperative assessment of tumor volume and oncologic adequacy of surgical margins was studied retrospectively. Our hypothesis was that the risk of inadequate, or positive, margins would rise with increasing tumor volume and that this would adversely affect survival. We anticipated that limitations of surgical approaches used until 1988 would be reflected in an increasing proportion of positive margins with increasing tumor volume. We conducted a pilot study of 25 patients with malignant tumors of the anterolateral cranial base operated on at the University of Pittsburgh Center for Cranial Base Surgery between 1987 and 1988. Preoperative computed tomography assessment of tumor volume was performed in all patients, and correlation between tumor volume, surgical margins, and survival was examined. Follow-up interval averaged 31.7 months. Twelve histologic tumor types were represented, with squamous cell carcinoma the most common (eight patients [32%]). Tumor volume ranged from 0.9 to 390 cc, with a median of 48 cc. Based on a median split of tumor volumes, patients were classified as high volume (more than 48 cc) or low volume (less than 48 cc). Of patients in the high volume group, 92% were found to have positive surgical margins, whereas only 50% of patients in the low volume group had positive margins. Analysis of the effect of tumor volume and surgical margins on survival was limited by sample size constraints, but both high-tumor volume and positives margins tended to reduce patient survival.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029069697&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029069697&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 93

EP - 96

JO - Journal of Neurological Surgery, Part B: Skull Base

JF - Journal of Neurological Surgery, Part B: Skull Base

SN - 2193-6331

IS - 2

ER -