Skin examination behavior

The role of melanoma history, skin type, psychosocial factors, and region of residence in determining clinical and self-conducted skin examination

Nadine A. Kasparian, Richard Bränström, Yu Mei Chang, Paul Affleck, Lisa G. Aspinwall, Aad Tibben, Esther Azizi, Orna Baron-Epel, Linda Battistuzzi, William Bruno, May Chan, Francisco Cuellar, Tadeusz Debniak, Dace Pjanova, Slawomir Ertmanski, Adina Figl, Melinda Gonzalez, Nicholas K. Hayward, Marko Hocevar, Peter A. Kanetsky & 10 others Sancy Leachman, Wilma Bergman, Olita Heisele, Jane Palmer, Barbara Peric, Susana Puig, Dirk Schadendorf, Nelleke A. Gruis, Julia Newton-Bishop, Yvonne Brandberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To examine the frequency and correlates of skin examination behaviors in an international sample of individuals at varying risk of developing melanoma. Design : A cross-sectional, web-based survey. Setting: Data were collected from the general population over a 20-month period on behalf of the Melanoma Genetics Consortium (GenoMEL). Participants : A total of 8178 adults from Northern (32%), Central (33%), and Southern (14%) Europe, Australia (13%), and the United States (8%). Main Outcome Measures: Self-reported frequency of skin self-examination (SSE) and clinical skin examination (CSE). Results: After adjustment for age and sex, frequency of skin examination was higher in both Australia (odds ratio [OR]SSE = 1.80 [99% CI, 1.49-2.18]; ORCSE = 2.68 [99% CI, 2.23-3.23]) and the United States (ORSSE = 2.28 [99% CI, 1.76-2.94]; ORCSE = 3.39 [99% CI, 2.60-4.18]) than in the 3 European regions combined. Within Europe, participants from Southern Europe reported higher rates of SSE than those in Northern Europe (ORSSE = 1.61 [99% CI, 1.31-1.97]), and frequency of CSE was higher in both Central (ORCSE = 1.47 [99% CI, 1.22-1.78]) and Southern Europe (ORCSE = 3.46 [99% CI, 2.78, 4.31]) than in Northern Europe. Skin examination behavior also varied according to melanoma history: participants with no history of melanoma reported the lowest levels of skin examination, while participants with a previous melanoma diagnosis reported the highest levels. After adjustment for region, and taking into account the role of age, sex, skin type, and mole count, engagement in SSE and CSE was associated with a range of psychosocial factors, including perceived risk of developing melanoma; perceived benefits of, and barriers to, skin examination; perceived confidence in one's ability to engage in screening; and social norms. In addition, among those with no history of melanoma, higher cancer-related worry was associated with greater frequency of SSE. Conclusions: Given the strong association between psychosocial factors and skin examination behaviors, particularly among people with no history of melanoma, we recommend that greater attempts be made to integrate psycho-education into the fabric of public health initiatives and clinical care, with clinicians, researchers, and advocacy groups playing a key role in guiding individuals to appropriate tools and resources.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1142-1151
Number of pages10
JournalArchives of Dermatology
Volume148
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Melanoma
Psychology
Skin
Self-Examination
Aptitude
Nevus
Public Health
Odds Ratio
Research Personnel
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Education

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology

Cite this

Skin examination behavior : The role of melanoma history, skin type, psychosocial factors, and region of residence in determining clinical and self-conducted skin examination. / Kasparian, Nadine A.; Bränström, Richard; Chang, Yu Mei; Affleck, Paul; Aspinwall, Lisa G.; Tibben, Aad; Azizi, Esther; Baron-Epel, Orna; Battistuzzi, Linda; Bruno, William; Chan, May; Cuellar, Francisco; Debniak, Tadeusz; Pjanova, Dace; Ertmanski, Slawomir; Figl, Adina; Gonzalez, Melinda; Hayward, Nicholas K.; Hocevar, Marko; Kanetsky, Peter A.; Leachman, Sancy; Bergman, Wilma; Heisele, Olita; Palmer, Jane; Peric, Barbara; Puig, Susana; Schadendorf, Dirk; Gruis, Nelleke A.; Newton-Bishop, Julia; Brandberg, Yvonne.

In: Archives of Dermatology, Vol. 148, No. 10, 10.2012, p. 1142-1151.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kasparian, NA, Bränström, R, Chang, YM, Affleck, P, Aspinwall, LG, Tibben, A, Azizi, E, Baron-Epel, O, Battistuzzi, L, Bruno, W, Chan, M, Cuellar, F, Debniak, T, Pjanova, D, Ertmanski, S, Figl, A, Gonzalez, M, Hayward, NK, Hocevar, M, Kanetsky, PA, Leachman, S, Bergman, W, Heisele, O, Palmer, J, Peric, B, Puig, S, Schadendorf, D, Gruis, NA, Newton-Bishop, J & Brandberg, Y 2012, 'Skin examination behavior: The role of melanoma history, skin type, psychosocial factors, and region of residence in determining clinical and self-conducted skin examination', Archives of Dermatology, vol. 148, no. 10, pp. 1142-1151. https://doi.org/10.1001/archdermatol.2012.1817
Kasparian, Nadine A. ; Bränström, Richard ; Chang, Yu Mei ; Affleck, Paul ; Aspinwall, Lisa G. ; Tibben, Aad ; Azizi, Esther ; Baron-Epel, Orna ; Battistuzzi, Linda ; Bruno, William ; Chan, May ; Cuellar, Francisco ; Debniak, Tadeusz ; Pjanova, Dace ; Ertmanski, Slawomir ; Figl, Adina ; Gonzalez, Melinda ; Hayward, Nicholas K. ; Hocevar, Marko ; Kanetsky, Peter A. ; Leachman, Sancy ; Bergman, Wilma ; Heisele, Olita ; Palmer, Jane ; Peric, Barbara ; Puig, Susana ; Schadendorf, Dirk ; Gruis, Nelleke A. ; Newton-Bishop, Julia ; Brandberg, Yvonne. / Skin examination behavior : The role of melanoma history, skin type, psychosocial factors, and region of residence in determining clinical and self-conducted skin examination. In: Archives of Dermatology. 2012 ; Vol. 148, No. 10. pp. 1142-1151.
@article{3ae67fcacaa046988ff5a6ebba8531e9,
title = "Skin examination behavior: The role of melanoma history, skin type, psychosocial factors, and region of residence in determining clinical and self-conducted skin examination",
abstract = "Objective: To examine the frequency and correlates of skin examination behaviors in an international sample of individuals at varying risk of developing melanoma. Design : A cross-sectional, web-based survey. Setting: Data were collected from the general population over a 20-month period on behalf of the Melanoma Genetics Consortium (GenoMEL). Participants : A total of 8178 adults from Northern (32{\%}), Central (33{\%}), and Southern (14{\%}) Europe, Australia (13{\%}), and the United States (8{\%}). Main Outcome Measures: Self-reported frequency of skin self-examination (SSE) and clinical skin examination (CSE). Results: After adjustment for age and sex, frequency of skin examination was higher in both Australia (odds ratio [OR]SSE = 1.80 [99{\%} CI, 1.49-2.18]; ORCSE = 2.68 [99{\%} CI, 2.23-3.23]) and the United States (ORSSE = 2.28 [99{\%} CI, 1.76-2.94]; ORCSE = 3.39 [99{\%} CI, 2.60-4.18]) than in the 3 European regions combined. Within Europe, participants from Southern Europe reported higher rates of SSE than those in Northern Europe (ORSSE = 1.61 [99{\%} CI, 1.31-1.97]), and frequency of CSE was higher in both Central (ORCSE = 1.47 [99{\%} CI, 1.22-1.78]) and Southern Europe (ORCSE = 3.46 [99{\%} CI, 2.78, 4.31]) than in Northern Europe. Skin examination behavior also varied according to melanoma history: participants with no history of melanoma reported the lowest levels of skin examination, while participants with a previous melanoma diagnosis reported the highest levels. After adjustment for region, and taking into account the role of age, sex, skin type, and mole count, engagement in SSE and CSE was associated with a range of psychosocial factors, including perceived risk of developing melanoma; perceived benefits of, and barriers to, skin examination; perceived confidence in one's ability to engage in screening; and social norms. In addition, among those with no history of melanoma, higher cancer-related worry was associated with greater frequency of SSE. Conclusions: Given the strong association between psychosocial factors and skin examination behaviors, particularly among people with no history of melanoma, we recommend that greater attempts be made to integrate psycho-education into the fabric of public health initiatives and clinical care, with clinicians, researchers, and advocacy groups playing a key role in guiding individuals to appropriate tools and resources.",
author = "Kasparian, {Nadine A.} and Richard Br{\"a}nstr{\"o}m and Chang, {Yu Mei} and Paul Affleck and Aspinwall, {Lisa G.} and Aad Tibben and Esther Azizi and Orna Baron-Epel and Linda Battistuzzi and William Bruno and May Chan and Francisco Cuellar and Tadeusz Debniak and Dace Pjanova and Slawomir Ertmanski and Adina Figl and Melinda Gonzalez and Hayward, {Nicholas K.} and Marko Hocevar and Kanetsky, {Peter A.} and Sancy Leachman and Wilma Bergman and Olita Heisele and Jane Palmer and Barbara Peric and Susana Puig and Dirk Schadendorf and Gruis, {Nelleke A.} and Julia Newton-Bishop and Yvonne Brandberg",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1001/archdermatol.2012.1817",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "148",
pages = "1142--1151",
journal = "JAMA Dermatology",
issn = "2168-6068",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Skin examination behavior

T2 - The role of melanoma history, skin type, psychosocial factors, and region of residence in determining clinical and self-conducted skin examination

AU - Kasparian, Nadine A.

AU - Bränström, Richard

AU - Chang, Yu Mei

AU - Affleck, Paul

AU - Aspinwall, Lisa G.

AU - Tibben, Aad

AU - Azizi, Esther

AU - Baron-Epel, Orna

AU - Battistuzzi, Linda

AU - Bruno, William

AU - Chan, May

AU - Cuellar, Francisco

AU - Debniak, Tadeusz

AU - Pjanova, Dace

AU - Ertmanski, Slawomir

AU - Figl, Adina

AU - Gonzalez, Melinda

AU - Hayward, Nicholas K.

AU - Hocevar, Marko

AU - Kanetsky, Peter A.

AU - Leachman, Sancy

AU - Bergman, Wilma

AU - Heisele, Olita

AU - Palmer, Jane

AU - Peric, Barbara

AU - Puig, Susana

AU - Schadendorf, Dirk

AU - Gruis, Nelleke A.

AU - Newton-Bishop, Julia

AU - Brandberg, Yvonne

PY - 2012/10

Y1 - 2012/10

N2 - Objective: To examine the frequency and correlates of skin examination behaviors in an international sample of individuals at varying risk of developing melanoma. Design : A cross-sectional, web-based survey. Setting: Data were collected from the general population over a 20-month period on behalf of the Melanoma Genetics Consortium (GenoMEL). Participants : A total of 8178 adults from Northern (32%), Central (33%), and Southern (14%) Europe, Australia (13%), and the United States (8%). Main Outcome Measures: Self-reported frequency of skin self-examination (SSE) and clinical skin examination (CSE). Results: After adjustment for age and sex, frequency of skin examination was higher in both Australia (odds ratio [OR]SSE = 1.80 [99% CI, 1.49-2.18]; ORCSE = 2.68 [99% CI, 2.23-3.23]) and the United States (ORSSE = 2.28 [99% CI, 1.76-2.94]; ORCSE = 3.39 [99% CI, 2.60-4.18]) than in the 3 European regions combined. Within Europe, participants from Southern Europe reported higher rates of SSE than those in Northern Europe (ORSSE = 1.61 [99% CI, 1.31-1.97]), and frequency of CSE was higher in both Central (ORCSE = 1.47 [99% CI, 1.22-1.78]) and Southern Europe (ORCSE = 3.46 [99% CI, 2.78, 4.31]) than in Northern Europe. Skin examination behavior also varied according to melanoma history: participants with no history of melanoma reported the lowest levels of skin examination, while participants with a previous melanoma diagnosis reported the highest levels. After adjustment for region, and taking into account the role of age, sex, skin type, and mole count, engagement in SSE and CSE was associated with a range of psychosocial factors, including perceived risk of developing melanoma; perceived benefits of, and barriers to, skin examination; perceived confidence in one's ability to engage in screening; and social norms. In addition, among those with no history of melanoma, higher cancer-related worry was associated with greater frequency of SSE. Conclusions: Given the strong association between psychosocial factors and skin examination behaviors, particularly among people with no history of melanoma, we recommend that greater attempts be made to integrate psycho-education into the fabric of public health initiatives and clinical care, with clinicians, researchers, and advocacy groups playing a key role in guiding individuals to appropriate tools and resources.

AB - Objective: To examine the frequency and correlates of skin examination behaviors in an international sample of individuals at varying risk of developing melanoma. Design : A cross-sectional, web-based survey. Setting: Data were collected from the general population over a 20-month period on behalf of the Melanoma Genetics Consortium (GenoMEL). Participants : A total of 8178 adults from Northern (32%), Central (33%), and Southern (14%) Europe, Australia (13%), and the United States (8%). Main Outcome Measures: Self-reported frequency of skin self-examination (SSE) and clinical skin examination (CSE). Results: After adjustment for age and sex, frequency of skin examination was higher in both Australia (odds ratio [OR]SSE = 1.80 [99% CI, 1.49-2.18]; ORCSE = 2.68 [99% CI, 2.23-3.23]) and the United States (ORSSE = 2.28 [99% CI, 1.76-2.94]; ORCSE = 3.39 [99% CI, 2.60-4.18]) than in the 3 European regions combined. Within Europe, participants from Southern Europe reported higher rates of SSE than those in Northern Europe (ORSSE = 1.61 [99% CI, 1.31-1.97]), and frequency of CSE was higher in both Central (ORCSE = 1.47 [99% CI, 1.22-1.78]) and Southern Europe (ORCSE = 3.46 [99% CI, 2.78, 4.31]) than in Northern Europe. Skin examination behavior also varied according to melanoma history: participants with no history of melanoma reported the lowest levels of skin examination, while participants with a previous melanoma diagnosis reported the highest levels. After adjustment for region, and taking into account the role of age, sex, skin type, and mole count, engagement in SSE and CSE was associated with a range of psychosocial factors, including perceived risk of developing melanoma; perceived benefits of, and barriers to, skin examination; perceived confidence in one's ability to engage in screening; and social norms. In addition, among those with no history of melanoma, higher cancer-related worry was associated with greater frequency of SSE. Conclusions: Given the strong association between psychosocial factors and skin examination behaviors, particularly among people with no history of melanoma, we recommend that greater attempts be made to integrate psycho-education into the fabric of public health initiatives and clinical care, with clinicians, researchers, and advocacy groups playing a key role in guiding individuals to appropriate tools and resources.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867637531&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867637531&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archdermatol.2012.1817

DO - 10.1001/archdermatol.2012.1817

M3 - Article

VL - 148

SP - 1142

EP - 1151

JO - JAMA Dermatology

JF - JAMA Dermatology

SN - 2168-6068

IS - 10

ER -