Size-appropriate radiation doses in pediatric body CT: A study of regional community adoption in the United States

Katharine Hopkins, David Pettersson, Caroline W. Koudelka, Kristopher Spinning, Petra L. Vajtai, Brooke Beckett, Dianna M E Bardo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: During the last decade, there has been a movement in the United States toward utilizing size-appropriate radiation doses for pediatric body CT, with smaller doses given to smaller patients. Objective: This study assesses community adoption of size-appropriate pediatric CT techniques. Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric body scans are compared between community facilities and a university children's hospital that tailors CT protocols to patient size as advocated by Image Gently. Materials and methods: We compared 164 pediatric body scans done at community facilities (group X) with 466 children's hospital scans. Children's hospital scans were divided into two groups: A, 250 performed with established pediatric weight-based protocols and filtered back projection; B, 216 performed with addition of iterative reconstruction technique and a 60% reduction in volume CT dose index (CTDI vol). SSDE was calculated and differences among groups were compared by regression analysis. Results: Mean SSDE was 1.6 and 3.9 times higher in group X than in groups A and B and 2.5 times higher for group A than group B. A model adjusting for confounders confirmed significant differences between group pairs. Conclusions: Regional community hospitals and imaging centers have not universally adopted child-sized pediatric CT practices. More education and accountability may be necessary to achieve widespread implementation. Since even lower radiation doses are possible with iterative reconstruction technique than with filtered back projection alone, further exploration of the former is encouraged.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1128-1135
Number of pages8
JournalPediatric Radiology
Volume43
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2013

Fingerprint

Radiation
Pediatrics
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Social Responsibility
Community Hospital
Regression Analysis
Education
Weights and Measures

Keywords

  • Children's hospitals
  • Community hospitals
  • Computed tomography
  • Pediatrics
  • Radiation dose reduction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Size-appropriate radiation doses in pediatric body CT : A study of regional community adoption in the United States. / Hopkins, Katharine; Pettersson, David; Koudelka, Caroline W.; Spinning, Kristopher; Vajtai, Petra L.; Beckett, Brooke; Bardo, Dianna M E.

In: Pediatric Radiology, Vol. 43, No. 9, 09.2013, p. 1128-1135.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hopkins, Katharine ; Pettersson, David ; Koudelka, Caroline W. ; Spinning, Kristopher ; Vajtai, Petra L. ; Beckett, Brooke ; Bardo, Dianna M E. / Size-appropriate radiation doses in pediatric body CT : A study of regional community adoption in the United States. In: Pediatric Radiology. 2013 ; Vol. 43, No. 9. pp. 1128-1135.
@article{48b0734ed65e45b0bfbc1a5400488564,
title = "Size-appropriate radiation doses in pediatric body CT: A study of regional community adoption in the United States",
abstract = "Background: During the last decade, there has been a movement in the United States toward utilizing size-appropriate radiation doses for pediatric body CT, with smaller doses given to smaller patients. Objective: This study assesses community adoption of size-appropriate pediatric CT techniques. Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric body scans are compared between community facilities and a university children's hospital that tailors CT protocols to patient size as advocated by Image Gently. Materials and methods: We compared 164 pediatric body scans done at community facilities (group X) with 466 children's hospital scans. Children's hospital scans were divided into two groups: A, 250 performed with established pediatric weight-based protocols and filtered back projection; B, 216 performed with addition of iterative reconstruction technique and a 60{\%} reduction in volume CT dose index (CTDI vol). SSDE was calculated and differences among groups were compared by regression analysis. Results: Mean SSDE was 1.6 and 3.9 times higher in group X than in groups A and B and 2.5 times higher for group A than group B. A model adjusting for confounders confirmed significant differences between group pairs. Conclusions: Regional community hospitals and imaging centers have not universally adopted child-sized pediatric CT practices. More education and accountability may be necessary to achieve widespread implementation. Since even lower radiation doses are possible with iterative reconstruction technique than with filtered back projection alone, further exploration of the former is encouraged.",
keywords = "Children's hospitals, Community hospitals, Computed tomography, Pediatrics, Radiation dose reduction",
author = "Katharine Hopkins and David Pettersson and Koudelka, {Caroline W.} and Kristopher Spinning and Vajtai, {Petra L.} and Brooke Beckett and Bardo, {Dianna M E}",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1007/s00247-013-2680-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "1128--1135",
journal = "Pediatric Radiology",
issn = "0301-0449",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "9",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Size-appropriate radiation doses in pediatric body CT

T2 - A study of regional community adoption in the United States

AU - Hopkins, Katharine

AU - Pettersson, David

AU - Koudelka, Caroline W.

AU - Spinning, Kristopher

AU - Vajtai, Petra L.

AU - Beckett, Brooke

AU - Bardo, Dianna M E

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - Background: During the last decade, there has been a movement in the United States toward utilizing size-appropriate radiation doses for pediatric body CT, with smaller doses given to smaller patients. Objective: This study assesses community adoption of size-appropriate pediatric CT techniques. Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric body scans are compared between community facilities and a university children's hospital that tailors CT protocols to patient size as advocated by Image Gently. Materials and methods: We compared 164 pediatric body scans done at community facilities (group X) with 466 children's hospital scans. Children's hospital scans were divided into two groups: A, 250 performed with established pediatric weight-based protocols and filtered back projection; B, 216 performed with addition of iterative reconstruction technique and a 60% reduction in volume CT dose index (CTDI vol). SSDE was calculated and differences among groups were compared by regression analysis. Results: Mean SSDE was 1.6 and 3.9 times higher in group X than in groups A and B and 2.5 times higher for group A than group B. A model adjusting for confounders confirmed significant differences between group pairs. Conclusions: Regional community hospitals and imaging centers have not universally adopted child-sized pediatric CT practices. More education and accountability may be necessary to achieve widespread implementation. Since even lower radiation doses are possible with iterative reconstruction technique than with filtered back projection alone, further exploration of the former is encouraged.

AB - Background: During the last decade, there has been a movement in the United States toward utilizing size-appropriate radiation doses for pediatric body CT, with smaller doses given to smaller patients. Objective: This study assesses community adoption of size-appropriate pediatric CT techniques. Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric body scans are compared between community facilities and a university children's hospital that tailors CT protocols to patient size as advocated by Image Gently. Materials and methods: We compared 164 pediatric body scans done at community facilities (group X) with 466 children's hospital scans. Children's hospital scans were divided into two groups: A, 250 performed with established pediatric weight-based protocols and filtered back projection; B, 216 performed with addition of iterative reconstruction technique and a 60% reduction in volume CT dose index (CTDI vol). SSDE was calculated and differences among groups were compared by regression analysis. Results: Mean SSDE was 1.6 and 3.9 times higher in group X than in groups A and B and 2.5 times higher for group A than group B. A model adjusting for confounders confirmed significant differences between group pairs. Conclusions: Regional community hospitals and imaging centers have not universally adopted child-sized pediatric CT practices. More education and accountability may be necessary to achieve widespread implementation. Since even lower radiation doses are possible with iterative reconstruction technique than with filtered back projection alone, further exploration of the former is encouraged.

KW - Children's hospitals

KW - Community hospitals

KW - Computed tomography

KW - Pediatrics

KW - Radiation dose reduction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84882915556&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84882915556&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00247-013-2680-7

DO - 10.1007/s00247-013-2680-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 23558461

AN - SCOPUS:84882915556

VL - 43

SP - 1128

EP - 1135

JO - Pediatric Radiology

JF - Pediatric Radiology

SN - 0301-0449

IS - 9

ER -