Single- versus double-layer hysterotomy closure at primary caesarean delivery and bladder adhesions

Y. J. Blumenfeld, Aaron Caughey, Y. Y. El-Sayed, K. Daniels, D. J. Lyell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To determine the association between single-layer (one running suture) and double-layer (second layer or imbricating suture) hysterotomy closure at primary caesarean delivery and subsequent adhesion formation. Design A secondary analysis from a prospective cohort study of women undergoing first repeat caesarean section. Setting Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. Population One hundred and twenty-seven pregnant women undergoing first repeat caesarean section. Methods Patient records were reviewed to identify whether primary caesarean hysterotomies were closed with a single or double layer. Data were analysed by Fisher's exact tests and multivariable logistic regression. Main outcome measure Prevalence rate of pelvic and abdominal adhesions. Results Of the 127 women, primary hysterotomy closure was single layer in 56 and double layer in 71. Single-layer hysterotomy closure was associated with bladder adhesions at the time of repeat caesarean (24% versus 7%, P = 0.01). Single-layer closure was associated in this study with a seven-fold increase in the odds of developing bladder adhesions (odds ratio, 6.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.72-28.1), regardless of other surgical techniques, previous labour, infection and age over 35 years. There was no association between single-layer closure and other pelvic or abdominal adhesions. Conclusions Primary single-layer hysterotomy closure may be associated with more frequent bladder adhesions during repeat caesarean deliveries. The severity and clinical implications of these adhesions should be assessed in large prospective trials.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)690-694
Number of pages5
JournalBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Volume117
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hysterotomy
Urinary Bladder
Repeat Cesarean Section
Sutures
Hospital Obstetrics and Gynecology Department
Gynecology
Pregnant Women
Cohort Studies
Logistic Models
Odds Ratio
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Prospective Studies
Confidence Intervals
Infection
Population

Keywords

  • Caesarean section
  • Double layer
  • Hysterotomy closure
  • Single layer
  • Suture technique
  • Tissue adhesions
  • Urinary bladder

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Single- versus double-layer hysterotomy closure at primary caesarean delivery and bladder adhesions. / Blumenfeld, Y. J.; Caughey, Aaron; El-Sayed, Y. Y.; Daniels, K.; Lyell, D. J.

In: BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vol. 117, No. 6, 05.2010, p. 690-694.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{c5ed795b086147098b567dfea7a6ad3e,
title = "Single- versus double-layer hysterotomy closure at primary caesarean delivery and bladder adhesions",
abstract = "Objective To determine the association between single-layer (one running suture) and double-layer (second layer or imbricating suture) hysterotomy closure at primary caesarean delivery and subsequent adhesion formation. Design A secondary analysis from a prospective cohort study of women undergoing first repeat caesarean section. Setting Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. Population One hundred and twenty-seven pregnant women undergoing first repeat caesarean section. Methods Patient records were reviewed to identify whether primary caesarean hysterotomies were closed with a single or double layer. Data were analysed by Fisher's exact tests and multivariable logistic regression. Main outcome measure Prevalence rate of pelvic and abdominal adhesions. Results Of the 127 women, primary hysterotomy closure was single layer in 56 and double layer in 71. Single-layer hysterotomy closure was associated with bladder adhesions at the time of repeat caesarean (24{\%} versus 7{\%}, P = 0.01). Single-layer closure was associated in this study with a seven-fold increase in the odds of developing bladder adhesions (odds ratio, 6.96; 95{\%} confidence interval, 1.72-28.1), regardless of other surgical techniques, previous labour, infection and age over 35 years. There was no association between single-layer closure and other pelvic or abdominal adhesions. Conclusions Primary single-layer hysterotomy closure may be associated with more frequent bladder adhesions during repeat caesarean deliveries. The severity and clinical implications of these adhesions should be assessed in large prospective trials.",
keywords = "Caesarean section, Double layer, Hysterotomy closure, Single layer, Suture technique, Tissue adhesions, Urinary bladder",
author = "Blumenfeld, {Y. J.} and Aaron Caughey and El-Sayed, {Y. Y.} and K. Daniels and Lyell, {D. J.}",
year = "2010",
month = "5",
doi = "10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02529.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "117",
pages = "690--694",
journal = "BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology",
issn = "1470-0328",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Single- versus double-layer hysterotomy closure at primary caesarean delivery and bladder adhesions

AU - Blumenfeld, Y. J.

AU - Caughey, Aaron

AU - El-Sayed, Y. Y.

AU - Daniels, K.

AU - Lyell, D. J.

PY - 2010/5

Y1 - 2010/5

N2 - Objective To determine the association between single-layer (one running suture) and double-layer (second layer or imbricating suture) hysterotomy closure at primary caesarean delivery and subsequent adhesion formation. Design A secondary analysis from a prospective cohort study of women undergoing first repeat caesarean section. Setting Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. Population One hundred and twenty-seven pregnant women undergoing first repeat caesarean section. Methods Patient records were reviewed to identify whether primary caesarean hysterotomies were closed with a single or double layer. Data were analysed by Fisher's exact tests and multivariable logistic regression. Main outcome measure Prevalence rate of pelvic and abdominal adhesions. Results Of the 127 women, primary hysterotomy closure was single layer in 56 and double layer in 71. Single-layer hysterotomy closure was associated with bladder adhesions at the time of repeat caesarean (24% versus 7%, P = 0.01). Single-layer closure was associated in this study with a seven-fold increase in the odds of developing bladder adhesions (odds ratio, 6.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.72-28.1), regardless of other surgical techniques, previous labour, infection and age over 35 years. There was no association between single-layer closure and other pelvic or abdominal adhesions. Conclusions Primary single-layer hysterotomy closure may be associated with more frequent bladder adhesions during repeat caesarean deliveries. The severity and clinical implications of these adhesions should be assessed in large prospective trials.

AB - Objective To determine the association between single-layer (one running suture) and double-layer (second layer or imbricating suture) hysterotomy closure at primary caesarean delivery and subsequent adhesion formation. Design A secondary analysis from a prospective cohort study of women undergoing first repeat caesarean section. Setting Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. Population One hundred and twenty-seven pregnant women undergoing first repeat caesarean section. Methods Patient records were reviewed to identify whether primary caesarean hysterotomies were closed with a single or double layer. Data were analysed by Fisher's exact tests and multivariable logistic regression. Main outcome measure Prevalence rate of pelvic and abdominal adhesions. Results Of the 127 women, primary hysterotomy closure was single layer in 56 and double layer in 71. Single-layer hysterotomy closure was associated with bladder adhesions at the time of repeat caesarean (24% versus 7%, P = 0.01). Single-layer closure was associated in this study with a seven-fold increase in the odds of developing bladder adhesions (odds ratio, 6.96; 95% confidence interval, 1.72-28.1), regardless of other surgical techniques, previous labour, infection and age over 35 years. There was no association between single-layer closure and other pelvic or abdominal adhesions. Conclusions Primary single-layer hysterotomy closure may be associated with more frequent bladder adhesions during repeat caesarean deliveries. The severity and clinical implications of these adhesions should be assessed in large prospective trials.

KW - Caesarean section

KW - Double layer

KW - Hysterotomy closure

KW - Single layer

KW - Suture technique

KW - Tissue adhesions

KW - Urinary bladder

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77950674813&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77950674813&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02529.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02529.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 20236104

AN - SCOPUS:77950674813

VL - 117

SP - 690

EP - 694

JO - BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

JF - BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

SN - 1470-0328

IS - 6

ER -