Simulation Training Curricula for Neurosurgical Residents: Cervical Foraminotomy and Durotomy Repair Modules

George M. Ghobrial, Karl Balsara, Christopher M. Maulucci, Daniel K. Resnick, Nathan Selden, Ashwini D. Sharan, James S. Harrop

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction Since 2010, the Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS) has offered a neurosurgical skills simulation course for residents and medical students. The authors describe their experience with incorporation of two neurosurgical skills simulation modules into the dedicated resident training curriculum of a single ACGME-accredited training program, using lumbar dural repair (5) and posterior cervical laminoforaminotomy modules from the CNS simulation initiative (6). Methods Each of the available 22 neurosurgery residents at a single residency program was given two 20-question pretests for a cervical laminoforaminotomy and durotomy repair module as a basic test of regional anatomy, general disease knowledge, surgical decision making, and recently published literature. This was followed by a faculty-directed skills simulation course and concluded with a final 20 question post-test. Results Posterior cervical laminoforaminotomy was performed once by each resident, and grading was conducted using the predetermined OSATs. The overall score was 56.1 (70%, range 26-76, maximum 80 points) with a trend towards higher scores with advanced levels of training. All residents completed the durotomy repair OSATs for a total of three trials. Of a maximum composite score of 60, a mean 37.2 (62%, range 15-58) was scored by the residents (Table 3). The mean OSAT scores for each durotomy trial was 2.66, 3.15, and 3.48 on each success test. A trend towards higher scores in advanced years of training was observed, but did not reach statistical significance (Figure 3). Conclusions Duty hour limitations and regulatory pressure for enhanced quality and outcomes may limit access of neurosurgical residents to fundamental skills training. Fundamental skills training as part of a validated simulation curriculum can mitigate this challenge to residency education. National development of effective technical simulation modules for use in individual residency training programs is a promising strategy to achieve these goals.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)751-755.E7
JournalWorld Neurosurgery
Volume84
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2015

Fingerprint

Foraminotomy
Internship and Residency
Curriculum
Education
Regional Anatomy
Neurosurgery
Medical Students
Decision Making
Pressure
Simulation Training

Keywords

  • Cervical foraminotomy
  • Durotomy repair
  • Resident education
  • Simulation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Ghobrial, G. M., Balsara, K., Maulucci, C. M., Resnick, D. K., Selden, N., Sharan, A. D., & Harrop, J. S. (2015). Simulation Training Curricula for Neurosurgical Residents: Cervical Foraminotomy and Durotomy Repair Modules. World Neurosurgery, 84(3), 751-755.E7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.04.056

Simulation Training Curricula for Neurosurgical Residents : Cervical Foraminotomy and Durotomy Repair Modules. / Ghobrial, George M.; Balsara, Karl; Maulucci, Christopher M.; Resnick, Daniel K.; Selden, Nathan; Sharan, Ashwini D.; Harrop, James S.

In: World Neurosurgery, Vol. 84, No. 3, 01.09.2015, p. 751-755.E7.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ghobrial, GM, Balsara, K, Maulucci, CM, Resnick, DK, Selden, N, Sharan, AD & Harrop, JS 2015, 'Simulation Training Curricula for Neurosurgical Residents: Cervical Foraminotomy and Durotomy Repair Modules', World Neurosurgery, vol. 84, no. 3, pp. 751-755.E7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2015.04.056
Ghobrial, George M. ; Balsara, Karl ; Maulucci, Christopher M. ; Resnick, Daniel K. ; Selden, Nathan ; Sharan, Ashwini D. ; Harrop, James S. / Simulation Training Curricula for Neurosurgical Residents : Cervical Foraminotomy and Durotomy Repair Modules. In: World Neurosurgery. 2015 ; Vol. 84, No. 3. pp. 751-755.E7.
@article{fe8ee45e93b14bd39851533a5871c586,
title = "Simulation Training Curricula for Neurosurgical Residents: Cervical Foraminotomy and Durotomy Repair Modules",
abstract = "Introduction Since 2010, the Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS) has offered a neurosurgical skills simulation course for residents and medical students. The authors describe their experience with incorporation of two neurosurgical skills simulation modules into the dedicated resident training curriculum of a single ACGME-accredited training program, using lumbar dural repair (5) and posterior cervical laminoforaminotomy modules from the CNS simulation initiative (6). Methods Each of the available 22 neurosurgery residents at a single residency program was given two 20-question pretests for a cervical laminoforaminotomy and durotomy repair module as a basic test of regional anatomy, general disease knowledge, surgical decision making, and recently published literature. This was followed by a faculty-directed skills simulation course and concluded with a final 20 question post-test. Results Posterior cervical laminoforaminotomy was performed once by each resident, and grading was conducted using the predetermined OSATs. The overall score was 56.1 (70{\%}, range 26-76, maximum 80 points) with a trend towards higher scores with advanced levels of training. All residents completed the durotomy repair OSATs for a total of three trials. Of a maximum composite score of 60, a mean 37.2 (62{\%}, range 15-58) was scored by the residents (Table 3). The mean OSAT scores for each durotomy trial was 2.66, 3.15, and 3.48 on each success test. A trend towards higher scores in advanced years of training was observed, but did not reach statistical significance (Figure 3). Conclusions Duty hour limitations and regulatory pressure for enhanced quality and outcomes may limit access of neurosurgical residents to fundamental skills training. Fundamental skills training as part of a validated simulation curriculum can mitigate this challenge to residency education. National development of effective technical simulation modules for use in individual residency training programs is a promising strategy to achieve these goals.",
keywords = "Cervical foraminotomy, Durotomy repair, Resident education, Simulation",
author = "Ghobrial, {George M.} and Karl Balsara and Maulucci, {Christopher M.} and Resnick, {Daniel K.} and Nathan Selden and Sharan, {Ashwini D.} and Harrop, {James S.}",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.wneu.2015.04.056",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
pages = "751--755.E7",
journal = "World Neurosurgery",
issn = "1878-8750",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Simulation Training Curricula for Neurosurgical Residents

T2 - Cervical Foraminotomy and Durotomy Repair Modules

AU - Ghobrial, George M.

AU - Balsara, Karl

AU - Maulucci, Christopher M.

AU - Resnick, Daniel K.

AU - Selden, Nathan

AU - Sharan, Ashwini D.

AU - Harrop, James S.

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - Introduction Since 2010, the Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS) has offered a neurosurgical skills simulation course for residents and medical students. The authors describe their experience with incorporation of two neurosurgical skills simulation modules into the dedicated resident training curriculum of a single ACGME-accredited training program, using lumbar dural repair (5) and posterior cervical laminoforaminotomy modules from the CNS simulation initiative (6). Methods Each of the available 22 neurosurgery residents at a single residency program was given two 20-question pretests for a cervical laminoforaminotomy and durotomy repair module as a basic test of regional anatomy, general disease knowledge, surgical decision making, and recently published literature. This was followed by a faculty-directed skills simulation course and concluded with a final 20 question post-test. Results Posterior cervical laminoforaminotomy was performed once by each resident, and grading was conducted using the predetermined OSATs. The overall score was 56.1 (70%, range 26-76, maximum 80 points) with a trend towards higher scores with advanced levels of training. All residents completed the durotomy repair OSATs for a total of three trials. Of a maximum composite score of 60, a mean 37.2 (62%, range 15-58) was scored by the residents (Table 3). The mean OSAT scores for each durotomy trial was 2.66, 3.15, and 3.48 on each success test. A trend towards higher scores in advanced years of training was observed, but did not reach statistical significance (Figure 3). Conclusions Duty hour limitations and regulatory pressure for enhanced quality and outcomes may limit access of neurosurgical residents to fundamental skills training. Fundamental skills training as part of a validated simulation curriculum can mitigate this challenge to residency education. National development of effective technical simulation modules for use in individual residency training programs is a promising strategy to achieve these goals.

AB - Introduction Since 2010, the Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS) has offered a neurosurgical skills simulation course for residents and medical students. The authors describe their experience with incorporation of two neurosurgical skills simulation modules into the dedicated resident training curriculum of a single ACGME-accredited training program, using lumbar dural repair (5) and posterior cervical laminoforaminotomy modules from the CNS simulation initiative (6). Methods Each of the available 22 neurosurgery residents at a single residency program was given two 20-question pretests for a cervical laminoforaminotomy and durotomy repair module as a basic test of regional anatomy, general disease knowledge, surgical decision making, and recently published literature. This was followed by a faculty-directed skills simulation course and concluded with a final 20 question post-test. Results Posterior cervical laminoforaminotomy was performed once by each resident, and grading was conducted using the predetermined OSATs. The overall score was 56.1 (70%, range 26-76, maximum 80 points) with a trend towards higher scores with advanced levels of training. All residents completed the durotomy repair OSATs for a total of three trials. Of a maximum composite score of 60, a mean 37.2 (62%, range 15-58) was scored by the residents (Table 3). The mean OSAT scores for each durotomy trial was 2.66, 3.15, and 3.48 on each success test. A trend towards higher scores in advanced years of training was observed, but did not reach statistical significance (Figure 3). Conclusions Duty hour limitations and regulatory pressure for enhanced quality and outcomes may limit access of neurosurgical residents to fundamental skills training. Fundamental skills training as part of a validated simulation curriculum can mitigate this challenge to residency education. National development of effective technical simulation modules for use in individual residency training programs is a promising strategy to achieve these goals.

KW - Cervical foraminotomy

KW - Durotomy repair

KW - Resident education

KW - Simulation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941174753&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941174753&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.04.056

DO - 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.04.056

M3 - Article

C2 - 25957725

AN - SCOPUS:84941174753

VL - 84

SP - 751-755.E7

JO - World Neurosurgery

JF - World Neurosurgery

SN - 1878-8750

IS - 3

ER -