Shoulder dystocia: Are historic risk factors reliable predictors?

Joseph G. Ouzounian, Robert B. Gherman, Roy Steinke, Julian Parer, Carol Reinsch, Duncan Neilson, Patricia Robertson, Hanns Haesslein, Marilyn Laughead, Aaron Caughey, Joel Cohen, Gary Burgoine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

59 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: Our purpose was to determine the rate of associated risk factors for shoulder dystocia from a large cohort of patients delivered within our Southern California perinatal program. Study design: A retrospective analysis was performed of patients delivered from January 1991 to June 2001. Patients with and without shoulder dystocia were identified from our computer-stored perinatal database and compared. Statistical methods used included: χ2 test, t test, calculation of odds ratios, and Fisher exact test, as indicated. Results: Among the 267,228 vaginal births during the study period, there were 1,686 cases of shoulder dystocia (rate 0.6%). Rates for operative vaginal delivery, diabetes, epidural use, multiparity, and postdatism were similar among cases with and without shoulder dystocia. The clinical triad of oxytocin use, labor induction, and birth weight greater than 4,500 g yielded a cumulative odds ratio of 23.2 (95% CI 17.3-31.0) for shoulder dystocia, but its sensitivity and positive predictive value were only 12.4% and 3.4%, respectively. Conclusion: Historic obstetric risk factors for shoulder dystocia are not useful predictors for the event. Furthermore, although shoulder dystocia was observed more frequently with increasing birth weight, current limitations in estimating birth weight antenatally with accuracy preclude its practical use as a reliable predictor.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1933-1938
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume192
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2005
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dystocia
Birth Weight
Odds Ratio
Induced Labor
Oxytocin
Parity
Obstetrics
Parturition
Databases

Keywords

  • Macrosomia
  • Shoulder dystocia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Ouzounian, J. G., Gherman, R. B., Steinke, R., Parer, J., Reinsch, C., Neilson, D., ... Burgoine, G. (2005). Shoulder dystocia: Are historic risk factors reliable predictors? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 192(6), 1933-1938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.054

Shoulder dystocia : Are historic risk factors reliable predictors? / Ouzounian, Joseph G.; Gherman, Robert B.; Steinke, Roy; Parer, Julian; Reinsch, Carol; Neilson, Duncan; Robertson, Patricia; Haesslein, Hanns; Laughead, Marilyn; Caughey, Aaron; Cohen, Joel; Burgoine, Gary.

In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Vol. 192, No. 6, 06.2005, p. 1933-1938.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Ouzounian, JG, Gherman, RB, Steinke, R, Parer, J, Reinsch, C, Neilson, D, Robertson, P, Haesslein, H, Laughead, M, Caughey, A, Cohen, J & Burgoine, G 2005, 'Shoulder dystocia: Are historic risk factors reliable predictors?', American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, vol. 192, no. 6, pp. 1933-1938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.054
Ouzounian JG, Gherman RB, Steinke R, Parer J, Reinsch C, Neilson D et al. Shoulder dystocia: Are historic risk factors reliable predictors? American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2005 Jun;192(6):1933-1938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.054
Ouzounian, Joseph G. ; Gherman, Robert B. ; Steinke, Roy ; Parer, Julian ; Reinsch, Carol ; Neilson, Duncan ; Robertson, Patricia ; Haesslein, Hanns ; Laughead, Marilyn ; Caughey, Aaron ; Cohen, Joel ; Burgoine, Gary. / Shoulder dystocia : Are historic risk factors reliable predictors?. In: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2005 ; Vol. 192, No. 6. pp. 1933-1938.
@article{40da9a7f6d6145b1839c6d8694c8e52c,
title = "Shoulder dystocia: Are historic risk factors reliable predictors?",
abstract = "Objective: Our purpose was to determine the rate of associated risk factors for shoulder dystocia from a large cohort of patients delivered within our Southern California perinatal program. Study design: A retrospective analysis was performed of patients delivered from January 1991 to June 2001. Patients with and without shoulder dystocia were identified from our computer-stored perinatal database and compared. Statistical methods used included: χ2 test, t test, calculation of odds ratios, and Fisher exact test, as indicated. Results: Among the 267,228 vaginal births during the study period, there were 1,686 cases of shoulder dystocia (rate 0.6{\%}). Rates for operative vaginal delivery, diabetes, epidural use, multiparity, and postdatism were similar among cases with and without shoulder dystocia. The clinical triad of oxytocin use, labor induction, and birth weight greater than 4,500 g yielded a cumulative odds ratio of 23.2 (95{\%} CI 17.3-31.0) for shoulder dystocia, but its sensitivity and positive predictive value were only 12.4{\%} and 3.4{\%}, respectively. Conclusion: Historic obstetric risk factors for shoulder dystocia are not useful predictors for the event. Furthermore, although shoulder dystocia was observed more frequently with increasing birth weight, current limitations in estimating birth weight antenatally with accuracy preclude its practical use as a reliable predictor.",
keywords = "Macrosomia, Shoulder dystocia",
author = "Ouzounian, {Joseph G.} and Gherman, {Robert B.} and Roy Steinke and Julian Parer and Carol Reinsch and Duncan Neilson and Patricia Robertson and Hanns Haesslein and Marilyn Laughead and Aaron Caughey and Joel Cohen and Gary Burgoine",
year = "2005",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.054",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "192",
pages = "1933--1938",
journal = "American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology",
issn = "0002-9378",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Shoulder dystocia

T2 - Are historic risk factors reliable predictors?

AU - Ouzounian, Joseph G.

AU - Gherman, Robert B.

AU - Steinke, Roy

AU - Parer, Julian

AU - Reinsch, Carol

AU - Neilson, Duncan

AU - Robertson, Patricia

AU - Haesslein, Hanns

AU - Laughead, Marilyn

AU - Caughey, Aaron

AU - Cohen, Joel

AU - Burgoine, Gary

PY - 2005/6

Y1 - 2005/6

N2 - Objective: Our purpose was to determine the rate of associated risk factors for shoulder dystocia from a large cohort of patients delivered within our Southern California perinatal program. Study design: A retrospective analysis was performed of patients delivered from January 1991 to June 2001. Patients with and without shoulder dystocia were identified from our computer-stored perinatal database and compared. Statistical methods used included: χ2 test, t test, calculation of odds ratios, and Fisher exact test, as indicated. Results: Among the 267,228 vaginal births during the study period, there were 1,686 cases of shoulder dystocia (rate 0.6%). Rates for operative vaginal delivery, diabetes, epidural use, multiparity, and postdatism were similar among cases with and without shoulder dystocia. The clinical triad of oxytocin use, labor induction, and birth weight greater than 4,500 g yielded a cumulative odds ratio of 23.2 (95% CI 17.3-31.0) for shoulder dystocia, but its sensitivity and positive predictive value were only 12.4% and 3.4%, respectively. Conclusion: Historic obstetric risk factors for shoulder dystocia are not useful predictors for the event. Furthermore, although shoulder dystocia was observed more frequently with increasing birth weight, current limitations in estimating birth weight antenatally with accuracy preclude its practical use as a reliable predictor.

AB - Objective: Our purpose was to determine the rate of associated risk factors for shoulder dystocia from a large cohort of patients delivered within our Southern California perinatal program. Study design: A retrospective analysis was performed of patients delivered from January 1991 to June 2001. Patients with and without shoulder dystocia were identified from our computer-stored perinatal database and compared. Statistical methods used included: χ2 test, t test, calculation of odds ratios, and Fisher exact test, as indicated. Results: Among the 267,228 vaginal births during the study period, there were 1,686 cases of shoulder dystocia (rate 0.6%). Rates for operative vaginal delivery, diabetes, epidural use, multiparity, and postdatism were similar among cases with and without shoulder dystocia. The clinical triad of oxytocin use, labor induction, and birth weight greater than 4,500 g yielded a cumulative odds ratio of 23.2 (95% CI 17.3-31.0) for shoulder dystocia, but its sensitivity and positive predictive value were only 12.4% and 3.4%, respectively. Conclusion: Historic obstetric risk factors for shoulder dystocia are not useful predictors for the event. Furthermore, although shoulder dystocia was observed more frequently with increasing birth weight, current limitations in estimating birth weight antenatally with accuracy preclude its practical use as a reliable predictor.

KW - Macrosomia

KW - Shoulder dystocia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=20444464519&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=20444464519&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.054

DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2005.02.054

M3 - Article

C2 - 15970854

AN - SCOPUS:20444464519

VL - 192

SP - 1933

EP - 1938

JO - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

JF - American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

SN - 0002-9378

IS - 6

ER -