Short interpregnancy intervals and adverse perinatal outcomes in high-resource settings: An updated systematic review

Katherine A. Ahrens, Heidi Nelson, Reva L. Stidd, Susan Moskosky, Jennifer A. Hutcheon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: This systematic review summarises association between short interpregnancy intervals and adverse perinatal health outcomes in high-resource settings to inform recommendations for healthy birth spacing for the United States. Methods: Five databases and a previous systematic review were searched for relevant articles published between 1966 and 1 May 2017. We included studies meeting the following criteria: (a) reporting of perinatal health outcomes after a short interpregnancy interval since last livebirth; (b) conducted within a high-resource setting; and (c) estimates were adjusted for maternal age and at least one socio-economic factor. Results: Nine good-quality and 18 fair-quality studies were identified. Interpregnancy intervals <6 months were associated with a clinically and statistically significant increased risk of adverse outcomes in studies of preterm birth (eg, aOR ≥ 1.20 in 10 of 14 studies); spontaneous preterm birth (eg, aOR ≥ 1.20 in one of two studies); small-for-gestational age (eg, aOR ≥ 1.20 in 5 of 11 studies); and infant mortality (eg, aOR ≥ 1.20 in four of four studies), while four studies of perinatal death showed no association. Interpregnancy intervals of 6-11 and 12-17 months generally had smaller point estimates and confidence intervals that included the null. Most studies were population-based and few included adjustment for detailed measures of key confounders. Conclusions: In high-resource settings, there is some evidence showing interpregnancy intervals <6 months since last livebirth are associated with increased risks for preterm birth, small-for-gestational age and infant death; however, results were inconsistent. Additional research controlling for confounding would further inform recommendations for healthy birth spacing for the United States.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalPaediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Premature Birth
Birth Intervals
Small for Gestational Age Infant
Maternal Age
Health
Infant Mortality
Gestational Age
Economics
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Databases
Confidence Intervals
Research
Population

Keywords

  • birth spacing
  • birth-to-conception interval
  • interpregnancy interval
  • perinatal
  • preterm
  • review

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health

Cite this

Short interpregnancy intervals and adverse perinatal outcomes in high-resource settings : An updated systematic review. / Ahrens, Katherine A.; Nelson, Heidi; Stidd, Reva L.; Moskosky, Susan; Hutcheon, Jennifer A.

In: Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{a55d1b96d23047a2a59902b47bb86b9c,
title = "Short interpregnancy intervals and adverse perinatal outcomes in high-resource settings: An updated systematic review",
abstract = "Background: This systematic review summarises association between short interpregnancy intervals and adverse perinatal health outcomes in high-resource settings to inform recommendations for healthy birth spacing for the United States. Methods: Five databases and a previous systematic review were searched for relevant articles published between 1966 and 1 May 2017. We included studies meeting the following criteria: (a) reporting of perinatal health outcomes after a short interpregnancy interval since last livebirth; (b) conducted within a high-resource setting; and (c) estimates were adjusted for maternal age and at least one socio-economic factor. Results: Nine good-quality and 18 fair-quality studies were identified. Interpregnancy intervals <6 months were associated with a clinically and statistically significant increased risk of adverse outcomes in studies of preterm birth (eg, aOR ≥ 1.20 in 10 of 14 studies); spontaneous preterm birth (eg, aOR ≥ 1.20 in one of two studies); small-for-gestational age (eg, aOR ≥ 1.20 in 5 of 11 studies); and infant mortality (eg, aOR ≥ 1.20 in four of four studies), while four studies of perinatal death showed no association. Interpregnancy intervals of 6-11 and 12-17 months generally had smaller point estimates and confidence intervals that included the null. Most studies were population-based and few included adjustment for detailed measures of key confounders. Conclusions: In high-resource settings, there is some evidence showing interpregnancy intervals <6 months since last livebirth are associated with increased risks for preterm birth, small-for-gestational age and infant death; however, results were inconsistent. Additional research controlling for confounding would further inform recommendations for healthy birth spacing for the United States.",
keywords = "birth spacing, birth-to-conception interval, interpregnancy interval, perinatal, preterm, review",
author = "Ahrens, {Katherine A.} and Heidi Nelson and Stidd, {Reva L.} and Susan Moskosky and Hutcheon, {Jennifer A.}",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/ppe.12503",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology",
issn = "0269-5022",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Short interpregnancy intervals and adverse perinatal outcomes in high-resource settings

T2 - An updated systematic review

AU - Ahrens, Katherine A.

AU - Nelson, Heidi

AU - Stidd, Reva L.

AU - Moskosky, Susan

AU - Hutcheon, Jennifer A.

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Background: This systematic review summarises association between short interpregnancy intervals and adverse perinatal health outcomes in high-resource settings to inform recommendations for healthy birth spacing for the United States. Methods: Five databases and a previous systematic review were searched for relevant articles published between 1966 and 1 May 2017. We included studies meeting the following criteria: (a) reporting of perinatal health outcomes after a short interpregnancy interval since last livebirth; (b) conducted within a high-resource setting; and (c) estimates were adjusted for maternal age and at least one socio-economic factor. Results: Nine good-quality and 18 fair-quality studies were identified. Interpregnancy intervals <6 months were associated with a clinically and statistically significant increased risk of adverse outcomes in studies of preterm birth (eg, aOR ≥ 1.20 in 10 of 14 studies); spontaneous preterm birth (eg, aOR ≥ 1.20 in one of two studies); small-for-gestational age (eg, aOR ≥ 1.20 in 5 of 11 studies); and infant mortality (eg, aOR ≥ 1.20 in four of four studies), while four studies of perinatal death showed no association. Interpregnancy intervals of 6-11 and 12-17 months generally had smaller point estimates and confidence intervals that included the null. Most studies were population-based and few included adjustment for detailed measures of key confounders. Conclusions: In high-resource settings, there is some evidence showing interpregnancy intervals <6 months since last livebirth are associated with increased risks for preterm birth, small-for-gestational age and infant death; however, results were inconsistent. Additional research controlling for confounding would further inform recommendations for healthy birth spacing for the United States.

AB - Background: This systematic review summarises association between short interpregnancy intervals and adverse perinatal health outcomes in high-resource settings to inform recommendations for healthy birth spacing for the United States. Methods: Five databases and a previous systematic review were searched for relevant articles published between 1966 and 1 May 2017. We included studies meeting the following criteria: (a) reporting of perinatal health outcomes after a short interpregnancy interval since last livebirth; (b) conducted within a high-resource setting; and (c) estimates were adjusted for maternal age and at least one socio-economic factor. Results: Nine good-quality and 18 fair-quality studies were identified. Interpregnancy intervals <6 months were associated with a clinically and statistically significant increased risk of adverse outcomes in studies of preterm birth (eg, aOR ≥ 1.20 in 10 of 14 studies); spontaneous preterm birth (eg, aOR ≥ 1.20 in one of two studies); small-for-gestational age (eg, aOR ≥ 1.20 in 5 of 11 studies); and infant mortality (eg, aOR ≥ 1.20 in four of four studies), while four studies of perinatal death showed no association. Interpregnancy intervals of 6-11 and 12-17 months generally had smaller point estimates and confidence intervals that included the null. Most studies were population-based and few included adjustment for detailed measures of key confounders. Conclusions: In high-resource settings, there is some evidence showing interpregnancy intervals <6 months since last livebirth are associated with increased risks for preterm birth, small-for-gestational age and infant death; however, results were inconsistent. Additional research controlling for confounding would further inform recommendations for healthy birth spacing for the United States.

KW - birth spacing

KW - birth-to-conception interval

KW - interpregnancy interval

KW - perinatal

KW - preterm

KW - review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055516218&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85055516218&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/ppe.12503

DO - 10.1111/ppe.12503

M3 - Article

C2 - 30353935

AN - SCOPUS:85055516218

JO - Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology

JF - Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology

SN - 0269-5022

ER -