Severity of injury is underestimated in the absence of autopsy verification

William H. Marx, Howard M. Simon, Mary Jumbelic, Emily Sposato, Gary Nieman, Robert C. Mackersie, Peter Angood, Alex B. Valadka, Richard Mullins

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

28 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Trauma disproportionately affects young, productive citizens. To decrease the preventable death rate and morbidity, and to save society some of the estimated $230 million per day revenue loss attributable to these injuries, trauma systems were developed. New York State instituted a population-based regional trauma registry to enter all patients meeting appropriate International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnostic codes. Methods: We evaluated the registry records deaths in a single New York State trauma region. We compared the medical records used for registry entry to the autopsy records from the County Medical Examiner's Office to determine accuracy of diagnostic coding. On the basis of autopsy data, the records were then recoded and the extent of the trauma rescored. Results: One hundred thirty-four deaths from 1993 to 1998 were recorded. Twelve records (9%) were accurately entered. One hundred twenty-two records had 452 errors. The mean Injury Severity Score (ISS), based on the medical record face sheet, was 29.93. The revised ISS, based on autopsy review, was 34.44 (p = 0.0108, two-tailed t test). The 95% confidence interval of the difference was 1.05 to 7.96. Z scores were -14.36 before autopsy review and -13.21 after autopsy review (p = 0.4395, not significant). We demonstrated a significantly higher ISS in the patients who died when the autopsy findings were included for coding. This information was not available from the medical record. Conclusion: To accurately compare trauma center performance and injury severity, the inclusion of autopsy data is critically important. Present state law does not permit sharing of this information with the trauma centers. When comparing mortality rates of New York State trauma centers, data must be carefully interpreted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)46-50
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care
Volume57
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jul 2004
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Autopsy
Wounds and Injuries
Injury Severity Score
Trauma Centers
Medical Records
Registries
Coroners and Medical Examiners
Death Certificates
Mortality
Information Dissemination
International Classification of Diseases
Confidence Intervals
Morbidity
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Marx, W. H., Simon, H. M., Jumbelic, M., Sposato, E., Nieman, G., Mackersie, R. C., ... Mullins, R. (2004). Severity of injury is underestimated in the absence of autopsy verification. Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, 57(1), 46-50.

Severity of injury is underestimated in the absence of autopsy verification. / Marx, William H.; Simon, Howard M.; Jumbelic, Mary; Sposato, Emily; Nieman, Gary; Mackersie, Robert C.; Angood, Peter; Valadka, Alex B.; Mullins, Richard.

In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, Vol. 57, No. 1, 07.2004, p. 46-50.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Marx, WH, Simon, HM, Jumbelic, M, Sposato, E, Nieman, G, Mackersie, RC, Angood, P, Valadka, AB & Mullins, R 2004, 'Severity of injury is underestimated in the absence of autopsy verification', Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 46-50.
Marx WH, Simon HM, Jumbelic M, Sposato E, Nieman G, Mackersie RC et al. Severity of injury is underestimated in the absence of autopsy verification. Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care. 2004 Jul;57(1):46-50.
Marx, William H. ; Simon, Howard M. ; Jumbelic, Mary ; Sposato, Emily ; Nieman, Gary ; Mackersie, Robert C. ; Angood, Peter ; Valadka, Alex B. ; Mullins, Richard. / Severity of injury is underestimated in the absence of autopsy verification. In: Journal of Trauma - Injury, Infection and Critical Care. 2004 ; Vol. 57, No. 1. pp. 46-50.
@article{7fec18d7364343458190f0313a187a2c,
title = "Severity of injury is underestimated in the absence of autopsy verification",
abstract = "Background: Trauma disproportionately affects young, productive citizens. To decrease the preventable death rate and morbidity, and to save society some of the estimated $230 million per day revenue loss attributable to these injuries, trauma systems were developed. New York State instituted a population-based regional trauma registry to enter all patients meeting appropriate International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnostic codes. Methods: We evaluated the registry records deaths in a single New York State trauma region. We compared the medical records used for registry entry to the autopsy records from the County Medical Examiner's Office to determine accuracy of diagnostic coding. On the basis of autopsy data, the records were then recoded and the extent of the trauma rescored. Results: One hundred thirty-four deaths from 1993 to 1998 were recorded. Twelve records (9{\%}) were accurately entered. One hundred twenty-two records had 452 errors. The mean Injury Severity Score (ISS), based on the medical record face sheet, was 29.93. The revised ISS, based on autopsy review, was 34.44 (p = 0.0108, two-tailed t test). The 95{\%} confidence interval of the difference was 1.05 to 7.96. Z scores were -14.36 before autopsy review and -13.21 after autopsy review (p = 0.4395, not significant). We demonstrated a significantly higher ISS in the patients who died when the autopsy findings were included for coding. This information was not available from the medical record. Conclusion: To accurately compare trauma center performance and injury severity, the inclusion of autopsy data is critically important. Present state law does not permit sharing of this information with the trauma centers. When comparing mortality rates of New York State trauma centers, data must be carefully interpreted.",
author = "Marx, {William H.} and Simon, {Howard M.} and Mary Jumbelic and Emily Sposato and Gary Nieman and Mackersie, {Robert C.} and Peter Angood and Valadka, {Alex B.} and Richard Mullins",
year = "2004",
month = "7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "57",
pages = "46--50",
journal = "Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery",
issn = "2163-0755",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Severity of injury is underestimated in the absence of autopsy verification

AU - Marx, William H.

AU - Simon, Howard M.

AU - Jumbelic, Mary

AU - Sposato, Emily

AU - Nieman, Gary

AU - Mackersie, Robert C.

AU - Angood, Peter

AU - Valadka, Alex B.

AU - Mullins, Richard

PY - 2004/7

Y1 - 2004/7

N2 - Background: Trauma disproportionately affects young, productive citizens. To decrease the preventable death rate and morbidity, and to save society some of the estimated $230 million per day revenue loss attributable to these injuries, trauma systems were developed. New York State instituted a population-based regional trauma registry to enter all patients meeting appropriate International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnostic codes. Methods: We evaluated the registry records deaths in a single New York State trauma region. We compared the medical records used for registry entry to the autopsy records from the County Medical Examiner's Office to determine accuracy of diagnostic coding. On the basis of autopsy data, the records were then recoded and the extent of the trauma rescored. Results: One hundred thirty-four deaths from 1993 to 1998 were recorded. Twelve records (9%) were accurately entered. One hundred twenty-two records had 452 errors. The mean Injury Severity Score (ISS), based on the medical record face sheet, was 29.93. The revised ISS, based on autopsy review, was 34.44 (p = 0.0108, two-tailed t test). The 95% confidence interval of the difference was 1.05 to 7.96. Z scores were -14.36 before autopsy review and -13.21 after autopsy review (p = 0.4395, not significant). We demonstrated a significantly higher ISS in the patients who died when the autopsy findings were included for coding. This information was not available from the medical record. Conclusion: To accurately compare trauma center performance and injury severity, the inclusion of autopsy data is critically important. Present state law does not permit sharing of this information with the trauma centers. When comparing mortality rates of New York State trauma centers, data must be carefully interpreted.

AB - Background: Trauma disproportionately affects young, productive citizens. To decrease the preventable death rate and morbidity, and to save society some of the estimated $230 million per day revenue loss attributable to these injuries, trauma systems were developed. New York State instituted a population-based regional trauma registry to enter all patients meeting appropriate International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnostic codes. Methods: We evaluated the registry records deaths in a single New York State trauma region. We compared the medical records used for registry entry to the autopsy records from the County Medical Examiner's Office to determine accuracy of diagnostic coding. On the basis of autopsy data, the records were then recoded and the extent of the trauma rescored. Results: One hundred thirty-four deaths from 1993 to 1998 were recorded. Twelve records (9%) were accurately entered. One hundred twenty-two records had 452 errors. The mean Injury Severity Score (ISS), based on the medical record face sheet, was 29.93. The revised ISS, based on autopsy review, was 34.44 (p = 0.0108, two-tailed t test). The 95% confidence interval of the difference was 1.05 to 7.96. Z scores were -14.36 before autopsy review and -13.21 after autopsy review (p = 0.4395, not significant). We demonstrated a significantly higher ISS in the patients who died when the autopsy findings were included for coding. This information was not available from the medical record. Conclusion: To accurately compare trauma center performance and injury severity, the inclusion of autopsy data is critically important. Present state law does not permit sharing of this information with the trauma centers. When comparing mortality rates of New York State trauma centers, data must be carefully interpreted.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=4043079159&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=4043079159&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 15284547

AN - SCOPUS:4043079159

VL - 57

SP - 46

EP - 50

JO - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

JF - Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery

SN - 2163-0755

IS - 1

ER -