Severity of Airflow Obstruction in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

Proposal for a New Classification

Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease Study investigators

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Current classifications of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) severity are complex and do not grade levels of obstruction. Obstruction is a simpler construct and independent of ethnicity. We constructed an index of obstruction severity based on the FEV1/FVC ratio, with cut-points dividing the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease (BOLD) study population into four similarly sized strata to those created by the GOLD criteria that uses FEV1. We measured the agreement between classifications and the validity of the FEV1-based classification in identifying the level of obstruction as defined by the new groupings. We compared the strengths of association of each classification with quality of life (QoL), MRC dyspnoea score and the self-reported exacerbation rate. Agreement between classifications was only fair. FEV1-based criteria for moderate COPD identified only 79% of those with moderate obstruction and misclassified half of the participants with mild obstruction as having more severe COPD. Both scales were equally strongly associated with QoL, exertional dyspnoea and respiratory exacerbations. Severity assessed using the FEV1/FVC ratio is only in moderate agreement with the severity assessed using FEV1 but is equally strongly associated with other outcomes. Severity assessed using the FEV1/FVC ratio is likely to be independent of ethnicity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-7
Number of pages7
JournalCOPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Aug 10 2017

Fingerprint

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Dyspnea
Quality of Life
Obstructive Lung Diseases
Population

Keywords

  • Epidemiological studies
  • GOLD classification
  • method comparison
  • spirometry

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Cite this

Severity of Airflow Obstruction in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) : Proposal for a New Classification. / Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease Study investigators.

In: COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, 10.08.2017, p. 1-7.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{095b5b0c60c64d1698a5dca675ad9f0d,
title = "Severity of Airflow Obstruction in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): Proposal for a New Classification",
abstract = "Current classifications of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) severity are complex and do not grade levels of obstruction. Obstruction is a simpler construct and independent of ethnicity. We constructed an index of obstruction severity based on the FEV1/FVC ratio, with cut-points dividing the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease (BOLD) study population into four similarly sized strata to those created by the GOLD criteria that uses FEV1. We measured the agreement between classifications and the validity of the FEV1-based classification in identifying the level of obstruction as defined by the new groupings. We compared the strengths of association of each classification with quality of life (QoL), MRC dyspnoea score and the self-reported exacerbation rate. Agreement between classifications was only fair. FEV1-based criteria for moderate COPD identified only 79{\%} of those with moderate obstruction and misclassified half of the participants with mild obstruction as having more severe COPD. Both scales were equally strongly associated with QoL, exertional dyspnoea and respiratory exacerbations. Severity assessed using the FEV1/FVC ratio is only in moderate agreement with the severity assessed using FEV1 but is equally strongly associated with other outcomes. Severity assessed using the FEV1/FVC ratio is likely to be independent of ethnicity.",
keywords = "Epidemiological studies, GOLD classification, method comparison, spirometry",
author = "{Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease Study investigators} and Sonia Coton and Vollmer, {William M.} and Eric Bateman and Marks, {Guy B.} and Wan Tan and Filip Mejza and Sanjay Juvekar and Christer Janson and Kevin Mortimer and {P. A.}, Mahesh and Buist, {A (Sonia)} and Burney, {Peter G.J.}",
year = "2017",
month = "8",
day = "10",
doi = "10.1080/15412555.2017.1339681",
language = "English (US)",
pages = "1--7",
journal = "COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease",
issn = "1541-2555",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Severity of Airflow Obstruction in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)

T2 - Proposal for a New Classification

AU - Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease Study investigators

AU - Coton, Sonia

AU - Vollmer, William M.

AU - Bateman, Eric

AU - Marks, Guy B.

AU - Tan, Wan

AU - Mejza, Filip

AU - Juvekar, Sanjay

AU - Janson, Christer

AU - Mortimer, Kevin

AU - P. A., Mahesh

AU - Buist, A (Sonia)

AU - Burney, Peter G.J.

PY - 2017/8/10

Y1 - 2017/8/10

N2 - Current classifications of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) severity are complex and do not grade levels of obstruction. Obstruction is a simpler construct and independent of ethnicity. We constructed an index of obstruction severity based on the FEV1/FVC ratio, with cut-points dividing the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease (BOLD) study population into four similarly sized strata to those created by the GOLD criteria that uses FEV1. We measured the agreement between classifications and the validity of the FEV1-based classification in identifying the level of obstruction as defined by the new groupings. We compared the strengths of association of each classification with quality of life (QoL), MRC dyspnoea score and the self-reported exacerbation rate. Agreement between classifications was only fair. FEV1-based criteria for moderate COPD identified only 79% of those with moderate obstruction and misclassified half of the participants with mild obstruction as having more severe COPD. Both scales were equally strongly associated with QoL, exertional dyspnoea and respiratory exacerbations. Severity assessed using the FEV1/FVC ratio is only in moderate agreement with the severity assessed using FEV1 but is equally strongly associated with other outcomes. Severity assessed using the FEV1/FVC ratio is likely to be independent of ethnicity.

AB - Current classifications of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) severity are complex and do not grade levels of obstruction. Obstruction is a simpler construct and independent of ethnicity. We constructed an index of obstruction severity based on the FEV1/FVC ratio, with cut-points dividing the Burden of Obstructive Lung Disease (BOLD) study population into four similarly sized strata to those created by the GOLD criteria that uses FEV1. We measured the agreement between classifications and the validity of the FEV1-based classification in identifying the level of obstruction as defined by the new groupings. We compared the strengths of association of each classification with quality of life (QoL), MRC dyspnoea score and the self-reported exacerbation rate. Agreement between classifications was only fair. FEV1-based criteria for moderate COPD identified only 79% of those with moderate obstruction and misclassified half of the participants with mild obstruction as having more severe COPD. Both scales were equally strongly associated with QoL, exertional dyspnoea and respiratory exacerbations. Severity assessed using the FEV1/FVC ratio is only in moderate agreement with the severity assessed using FEV1 but is equally strongly associated with other outcomes. Severity assessed using the FEV1/FVC ratio is likely to be independent of ethnicity.

KW - Epidemiological studies

KW - GOLD classification

KW - method comparison

KW - spirometry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027338865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027338865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15412555.2017.1339681

DO - 10.1080/15412555.2017.1339681

M3 - Article

SP - 1

EP - 7

JO - COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

JF - COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

SN - 1541-2555

ER -