Sensitivity and specificity of cognitive and functional screening instruments for dementia

The Indo-U.S. dementia epidemiology study

Rajesh Pandav, Gerda Fillenbaum, Graham Ratcliff, Hiroko Dodge, Mary Ganguli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There is a shortage of adequate screening instruments for dementia in poorly educated populations and non-English-speaking groups. An epidemiological survey was conducted in a population-based, largely illiterate, sample of 5,126 individuals aged 55 and older in 28 villages in the rural community of Ballabgarh in northern India. All participants were administered a general mental status test, the Hindi Mental State Examination (HMSE), and a brief battery of neuropsychological tests. Their informants answered a questionnaire assessing functional ability, the Everyday Abilities Scale for India (EASI). Six hundred thirty-two participants underwent clinical diagnostic evaluation for dementia. We investigated whether the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value for dementia of the mental status test could be improved by the addition of the brief neuropsychological test battery or the functional questionnaire, comparing the instruments alone and: in combination. In participants who could be tested cognitively, the HMSE, the neuropsychological battery, and EASI had sensitivities of 81.3%, 81.3%, and 62.5%, respectively, with specificities of 60.2%, 74.5%, and 89.7%, respectively. The combination of all three was 93.8% sensitive and 41.8% specific. The sensitivity of the HMSE alone was nonsignificantly improved by the addition of either the EASI or the neuropsychological battery, whereas its specificity was significantly decreased by either addition. An advantage of the EASI was that it could also be administered to informants of subjects who were cognitively untestable. In this largely illiterate community, with a low prevalence of dementia, the combination of cognitive tests and a functional ability questionnaire had substantial value for population screening.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)554-561
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
Volume50
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Aptitude
Dementia
Epidemiology
India
Sensitivity and Specificity
Intelligence Tests
Neuropsychological Tests
Population
Rural Population
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Aging
  • Community study
  • Epidemiology
  • Mental status
  • Population study
  • Predictive value

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geriatrics and Gerontology

Cite this

Sensitivity and specificity of cognitive and functional screening instruments for dementia : The Indo-U.S. dementia epidemiology study. / Pandav, Rajesh; Fillenbaum, Gerda; Ratcliff, Graham; Dodge, Hiroko; Ganguli, Mary.

In: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Vol. 50, No. 3, 2002, p. 554-561.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{e41e801302534084a4100bb0ff4d1640,
title = "Sensitivity and specificity of cognitive and functional screening instruments for dementia: The Indo-U.S. dementia epidemiology study",
abstract = "There is a shortage of adequate screening instruments for dementia in poorly educated populations and non-English-speaking groups. An epidemiological survey was conducted in a population-based, largely illiterate, sample of 5,126 individuals aged 55 and older in 28 villages in the rural community of Ballabgarh in northern India. All participants were administered a general mental status test, the Hindi Mental State Examination (HMSE), and a brief battery of neuropsychological tests. Their informants answered a questionnaire assessing functional ability, the Everyday Abilities Scale for India (EASI). Six hundred thirty-two participants underwent clinical diagnostic evaluation for dementia. We investigated whether the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value for dementia of the mental status test could be improved by the addition of the brief neuropsychological test battery or the functional questionnaire, comparing the instruments alone and: in combination. In participants who could be tested cognitively, the HMSE, the neuropsychological battery, and EASI had sensitivities of 81.3{\%}, 81.3{\%}, and 62.5{\%}, respectively, with specificities of 60.2{\%}, 74.5{\%}, and 89.7{\%}, respectively. The combination of all three was 93.8{\%} sensitive and 41.8{\%} specific. The sensitivity of the HMSE alone was nonsignificantly improved by the addition of either the EASI or the neuropsychological battery, whereas its specificity was significantly decreased by either addition. An advantage of the EASI was that it could also be administered to informants of subjects who were cognitively untestable. In this largely illiterate community, with a low prevalence of dementia, the combination of cognitive tests and a functional ability questionnaire had substantial value for population screening.",
keywords = "Aging, Community study, Epidemiology, Mental status, Population study, Predictive value",
author = "Rajesh Pandav and Gerda Fillenbaum and Graham Ratcliff and Hiroko Dodge and Mary Ganguli",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50126.x",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "50",
pages = "554--561",
journal = "Journal of the American Geriatrics Society",
issn = "0002-8614",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sensitivity and specificity of cognitive and functional screening instruments for dementia

T2 - The Indo-U.S. dementia epidemiology study

AU - Pandav, Rajesh

AU - Fillenbaum, Gerda

AU - Ratcliff, Graham

AU - Dodge, Hiroko

AU - Ganguli, Mary

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - There is a shortage of adequate screening instruments for dementia in poorly educated populations and non-English-speaking groups. An epidemiological survey was conducted in a population-based, largely illiterate, sample of 5,126 individuals aged 55 and older in 28 villages in the rural community of Ballabgarh in northern India. All participants were administered a general mental status test, the Hindi Mental State Examination (HMSE), and a brief battery of neuropsychological tests. Their informants answered a questionnaire assessing functional ability, the Everyday Abilities Scale for India (EASI). Six hundred thirty-two participants underwent clinical diagnostic evaluation for dementia. We investigated whether the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value for dementia of the mental status test could be improved by the addition of the brief neuropsychological test battery or the functional questionnaire, comparing the instruments alone and: in combination. In participants who could be tested cognitively, the HMSE, the neuropsychological battery, and EASI had sensitivities of 81.3%, 81.3%, and 62.5%, respectively, with specificities of 60.2%, 74.5%, and 89.7%, respectively. The combination of all three was 93.8% sensitive and 41.8% specific. The sensitivity of the HMSE alone was nonsignificantly improved by the addition of either the EASI or the neuropsychological battery, whereas its specificity was significantly decreased by either addition. An advantage of the EASI was that it could also be administered to informants of subjects who were cognitively untestable. In this largely illiterate community, with a low prevalence of dementia, the combination of cognitive tests and a functional ability questionnaire had substantial value for population screening.

AB - There is a shortage of adequate screening instruments for dementia in poorly educated populations and non-English-speaking groups. An epidemiological survey was conducted in a population-based, largely illiterate, sample of 5,126 individuals aged 55 and older in 28 villages in the rural community of Ballabgarh in northern India. All participants were administered a general mental status test, the Hindi Mental State Examination (HMSE), and a brief battery of neuropsychological tests. Their informants answered a questionnaire assessing functional ability, the Everyday Abilities Scale for India (EASI). Six hundred thirty-two participants underwent clinical diagnostic evaluation for dementia. We investigated whether the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive value for dementia of the mental status test could be improved by the addition of the brief neuropsychological test battery or the functional questionnaire, comparing the instruments alone and: in combination. In participants who could be tested cognitively, the HMSE, the neuropsychological battery, and EASI had sensitivities of 81.3%, 81.3%, and 62.5%, respectively, with specificities of 60.2%, 74.5%, and 89.7%, respectively. The combination of all three was 93.8% sensitive and 41.8% specific. The sensitivity of the HMSE alone was nonsignificantly improved by the addition of either the EASI or the neuropsychological battery, whereas its specificity was significantly decreased by either addition. An advantage of the EASI was that it could also be administered to informants of subjects who were cognitively untestable. In this largely illiterate community, with a low prevalence of dementia, the combination of cognitive tests and a functional ability questionnaire had substantial value for population screening.

KW - Aging

KW - Community study

KW - Epidemiology

KW - Mental status

KW - Population study

KW - Predictive value

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036122305&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036122305&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50126.x

DO - 10.1046/j.1532-5415.2002.50126.x

M3 - Article

VL - 50

SP - 554

EP - 561

JO - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

JF - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

SN - 0002-8614

IS - 3

ER -