Selective preoperative ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring is sufficient for patients undergoing laparoscopic antireflux surgery

T. L. Trus, N. M. Selim, W. S. Richardson, J. M. Wo, G. D. Branum, S. J. Mauren, J. P. Waring, John Hunter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

We have previously shown that routine preoperative ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring is of marginal benefit in patients with endoscopic esophagitis and heartburn. The aim of this study was to compare the results of laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LAS) in patients who had routine preoperative pH study to those who did not have a preoperative pH study. Methods: Of 340 patients who underwent LAS, 155 underwent pH study as part of a routine preoperative workup (Group 1). More recently, 185 patients without endoscopic esophagitis did not undergo pH study (Group 2). Symptoms of chest pain, heartburn, and dysphagia were scored from 0 (none) to 4 (severe) before, six weeks after and one year after surgery. One year follow up data were available for 83 and 31 patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Symptom scores were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: There were no differences between the two groups with respect to age. gender, and preoperative symptom scores. Both groups experienced significant improvement in reflux symptoms six weeks and one year postoperatively. There were no differences in postoperative symptom scores between the two groups. Group 1 mean (SD) Group 2 mean (SD) preop 6 wk 1 yr preop 6 wk 1 yr Chest Pain 1.3(1.3)* .4 (.7) .3 (.7) 1.2 (1.3)* .7 (1.1) .3 (.6) Heartburn 2.8 (1.2)* .2 (.7) .4 (.9) 2.9 (1.3)* .2 (.6) .3 (.7) Dysphagia 1.4 (1.4)* .6 (.9) .4 (.7) 1.3(1.4)* .7 (1) .3 (.6) * p

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)434
Number of pages1
JournalGastrointestinal Endoscopy
Volume43
Issue number4
StatePublished - 1996
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Esophageal pH Monitoring
Laparoscopy
Heartburn
Esophagitis
Deglutition Disorders
Chest Pain
Nonparametric Statistics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

Selective preoperative ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring is sufficient for patients undergoing laparoscopic antireflux surgery. / Trus, T. L.; Selim, N. M.; Richardson, W. S.; Wo, J. M.; Branum, G. D.; Mauren, S. J.; Waring, J. P.; Hunter, John.

In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Vol. 43, No. 4, 1996, p. 434.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Trus, TL, Selim, NM, Richardson, WS, Wo, JM, Branum, GD, Mauren, SJ, Waring, JP & Hunter, J 1996, 'Selective preoperative ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring is sufficient for patients undergoing laparoscopic antireflux surgery', Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 434.
Trus, T. L. ; Selim, N. M. ; Richardson, W. S. ; Wo, J. M. ; Branum, G. D. ; Mauren, S. J. ; Waring, J. P. ; Hunter, John. / Selective preoperative ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring is sufficient for patients undergoing laparoscopic antireflux surgery. In: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. 1996 ; Vol. 43, No. 4. pp. 434.
@article{ae79a15621f64f0eb4486ab4f2db5a24,
title = "Selective preoperative ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring is sufficient for patients undergoing laparoscopic antireflux surgery",
abstract = "We have previously shown that routine preoperative ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring is of marginal benefit in patients with endoscopic esophagitis and heartburn. The aim of this study was to compare the results of laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LAS) in patients who had routine preoperative pH study to those who did not have a preoperative pH study. Methods: Of 340 patients who underwent LAS, 155 underwent pH study as part of a routine preoperative workup (Group 1). More recently, 185 patients without endoscopic esophagitis did not undergo pH study (Group 2). Symptoms of chest pain, heartburn, and dysphagia were scored from 0 (none) to 4 (severe) before, six weeks after and one year after surgery. One year follow up data were available for 83 and 31 patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Symptom scores were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: There were no differences between the two groups with respect to age. gender, and preoperative symptom scores. Both groups experienced significant improvement in reflux symptoms six weeks and one year postoperatively. There were no differences in postoperative symptom scores between the two groups. Group 1 mean (SD) Group 2 mean (SD) preop 6 wk 1 yr preop 6 wk 1 yr Chest Pain 1.3(1.3)* .4 (.7) .3 (.7) 1.2 (1.3)* .7 (1.1) .3 (.6) Heartburn 2.8 (1.2)* .2 (.7) .4 (.9) 2.9 (1.3)* .2 (.6) .3 (.7) Dysphagia 1.4 (1.4)* .6 (.9) .4 (.7) 1.3(1.4)* .7 (1) .3 (.6) * p",
author = "Trus, {T. L.} and Selim, {N. M.} and Richardson, {W. S.} and Wo, {J. M.} and Branum, {G. D.} and Mauren, {S. J.} and Waring, {J. P.} and John Hunter",
year = "1996",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "43",
pages = "434",
journal = "Gastrointestinal Endoscopy",
issn = "0016-5107",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Selective preoperative ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring is sufficient for patients undergoing laparoscopic antireflux surgery

AU - Trus, T. L.

AU - Selim, N. M.

AU - Richardson, W. S.

AU - Wo, J. M.

AU - Branum, G. D.

AU - Mauren, S. J.

AU - Waring, J. P.

AU - Hunter, John

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - We have previously shown that routine preoperative ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring is of marginal benefit in patients with endoscopic esophagitis and heartburn. The aim of this study was to compare the results of laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LAS) in patients who had routine preoperative pH study to those who did not have a preoperative pH study. Methods: Of 340 patients who underwent LAS, 155 underwent pH study as part of a routine preoperative workup (Group 1). More recently, 185 patients without endoscopic esophagitis did not undergo pH study (Group 2). Symptoms of chest pain, heartburn, and dysphagia were scored from 0 (none) to 4 (severe) before, six weeks after and one year after surgery. One year follow up data were available for 83 and 31 patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Symptom scores were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: There were no differences between the two groups with respect to age. gender, and preoperative symptom scores. Both groups experienced significant improvement in reflux symptoms six weeks and one year postoperatively. There were no differences in postoperative symptom scores between the two groups. Group 1 mean (SD) Group 2 mean (SD) preop 6 wk 1 yr preop 6 wk 1 yr Chest Pain 1.3(1.3)* .4 (.7) .3 (.7) 1.2 (1.3)* .7 (1.1) .3 (.6) Heartburn 2.8 (1.2)* .2 (.7) .4 (.9) 2.9 (1.3)* .2 (.6) .3 (.7) Dysphagia 1.4 (1.4)* .6 (.9) .4 (.7) 1.3(1.4)* .7 (1) .3 (.6) * p

AB - We have previously shown that routine preoperative ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring is of marginal benefit in patients with endoscopic esophagitis and heartburn. The aim of this study was to compare the results of laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LAS) in patients who had routine preoperative pH study to those who did not have a preoperative pH study. Methods: Of 340 patients who underwent LAS, 155 underwent pH study as part of a routine preoperative workup (Group 1). More recently, 185 patients without endoscopic esophagitis did not undergo pH study (Group 2). Symptoms of chest pain, heartburn, and dysphagia were scored from 0 (none) to 4 (severe) before, six weeks after and one year after surgery. One year follow up data were available for 83 and 31 patients in groups 1 and 2, respectively. Symptom scores were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: There were no differences between the two groups with respect to age. gender, and preoperative symptom scores. Both groups experienced significant improvement in reflux symptoms six weeks and one year postoperatively. There were no differences in postoperative symptom scores between the two groups. Group 1 mean (SD) Group 2 mean (SD) preop 6 wk 1 yr preop 6 wk 1 yr Chest Pain 1.3(1.3)* .4 (.7) .3 (.7) 1.2 (1.3)* .7 (1.1) .3 (.6) Heartburn 2.8 (1.2)* .2 (.7) .4 (.9) 2.9 (1.3)* .2 (.6) .3 (.7) Dysphagia 1.4 (1.4)* .6 (.9) .4 (.7) 1.3(1.4)* .7 (1) .3 (.6) * p

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=10544240921&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=10544240921&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:10544240921

VL - 43

SP - 434

JO - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

JF - Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

SN - 0016-5107

IS - 4

ER -