Selecting a generic measure of health-related quality of life for use among older adults: A comparison of candidate instruments

Elena Andresen, Barbaram Rothenberg, Robert Panzer, Paul Katz, Michael P. McDermott

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

37 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Selecting an outcomes assessment instrument requires knowledge of their relative merits, especially head-to-head comparisons. The authors compare health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) instruments among older adults for their psychometric properties and subject burden, specifically the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) and Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 (SF-36). Subjects were 282 of 373 eligible older adults (75.6% response) ranging in age from 65 to 96. SIP scores demonstrated a strong skew toward low (good health) scores with a mean of 11.1% (±SD 11.5) on the Total SIP index score. Similar components of the SIP and SF-36 were moderately to strongly correlated. The SIP suffered from a ceiling (good health) scaling effect, and the SF-36 scales also demonstrated some scaling extremes. These results demonstrate the relative scaling limits, especially the ceiling effect, of the SIP compared to the SF-36, and in general, the SF-36 is preferred for use among community-living older adults.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)244-264
Number of pages21
JournalEvaluation and the Health Professions
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1998
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Sickness Impact Profile
quality of life
illness
candidacy
Quality of Life
health
scaling
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Health
Psychometrics
psychometrics
community

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Nursing(all)
  • Health(social science)
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Health Policy

Cite this

Selecting a generic measure of health-related quality of life for use among older adults : A comparison of candidate instruments. / Andresen, Elena; Rothenberg, Barbaram; Panzer, Robert; Katz, Paul; McDermott, Michael P.

In: Evaluation and the Health Professions, Vol. 21, No. 2, 1998, p. 244-264.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Andresen, Elena ; Rothenberg, Barbaram ; Panzer, Robert ; Katz, Paul ; McDermott, Michael P. / Selecting a generic measure of health-related quality of life for use among older adults : A comparison of candidate instruments. In: Evaluation and the Health Professions. 1998 ; Vol. 21, No. 2. pp. 244-264.
@article{a6e5b1eab0f54ee59abb0c8df78d8062,
title = "Selecting a generic measure of health-related quality of life for use among older adults: A comparison of candidate instruments",
abstract = "Selecting an outcomes assessment instrument requires knowledge of their relative merits, especially head-to-head comparisons. The authors compare health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) instruments among older adults for their psychometric properties and subject burden, specifically the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) and Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 (SF-36). Subjects were 282 of 373 eligible older adults (75.6{\%} response) ranging in age from 65 to 96. SIP scores demonstrated a strong skew toward low (good health) scores with a mean of 11.1{\%} (±SD 11.5) on the Total SIP index score. Similar components of the SIP and SF-36 were moderately to strongly correlated. The SIP suffered from a ceiling (good health) scaling effect, and the SF-36 scales also demonstrated some scaling extremes. These results demonstrate the relative scaling limits, especially the ceiling effect, of the SIP compared to the SF-36, and in general, the SF-36 is preferred for use among community-living older adults.",
author = "Elena Andresen and Barbaram Rothenberg and Robert Panzer and Paul Katz and McDermott, {Michael P.}",
year = "1998",
doi = "10.1177/016327879802100206",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "21",
pages = "244--264",
journal = "Evaluation and the Health Professions",
issn = "0163-2787",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Selecting a generic measure of health-related quality of life for use among older adults

T2 - A comparison of candidate instruments

AU - Andresen, Elena

AU - Rothenberg, Barbaram

AU - Panzer, Robert

AU - Katz, Paul

AU - McDermott, Michael P.

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - Selecting an outcomes assessment instrument requires knowledge of their relative merits, especially head-to-head comparisons. The authors compare health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) instruments among older adults for their psychometric properties and subject burden, specifically the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) and Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 (SF-36). Subjects were 282 of 373 eligible older adults (75.6% response) ranging in age from 65 to 96. SIP scores demonstrated a strong skew toward low (good health) scores with a mean of 11.1% (±SD 11.5) on the Total SIP index score. Similar components of the SIP and SF-36 were moderately to strongly correlated. The SIP suffered from a ceiling (good health) scaling effect, and the SF-36 scales also demonstrated some scaling extremes. These results demonstrate the relative scaling limits, especially the ceiling effect, of the SIP compared to the SF-36, and in general, the SF-36 is preferred for use among community-living older adults.

AB - Selecting an outcomes assessment instrument requires knowledge of their relative merits, especially head-to-head comparisons. The authors compare health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) instruments among older adults for their psychometric properties and subject burden, specifically the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP) and Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form 36 (SF-36). Subjects were 282 of 373 eligible older adults (75.6% response) ranging in age from 65 to 96. SIP scores demonstrated a strong skew toward low (good health) scores with a mean of 11.1% (±SD 11.5) on the Total SIP index score. Similar components of the SIP and SF-36 were moderately to strongly correlated. The SIP suffered from a ceiling (good health) scaling effect, and the SF-36 scales also demonstrated some scaling extremes. These results demonstrate the relative scaling limits, especially the ceiling effect, of the SIP compared to the SF-36, and in general, the SF-36 is preferred for use among community-living older adults.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031981613&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031981613&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/016327879802100206

DO - 10.1177/016327879802100206

M3 - Article

C2 - 10183346

AN - SCOPUS:0031981613

VL - 21

SP - 244

EP - 264

JO - Evaluation and the Health Professions

JF - Evaluation and the Health Professions

SN - 0163-2787

IS - 2

ER -