Seeing What You Want to See: How Imprecise Uncertainty Ranges Enhance Motivated Reasoning

Nathan Dieckmann, Robin Gregory, Ellen Peters, Robert Hartman

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    9 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    In this article, we consider a novel criterion for evaluating representations of uncertainty ranges, namely, the extent to which a representation enhances motivated reasoning. In two studies, we show that perceptions of the distribution underlying ambiguous numerical ranges are affected by the motivations and worldviews of end users. This motivated reasoning effect remained after controlling for objective numeracy and fluid intelligence but was attenuated when the correct interpretation was made clear. We suggest that analysts and communicators explicitly consider the potential for motivated evaluation when evaluating uncertainty displays.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    JournalRisk Analysis
    DOIs
    StateAccepted/In press - 2016

    Fingerprint

    Uncertainty
    Intelligence
    Motivation
    Display devices
    Fluids

    Keywords

    • Motivated reasoning
    • Risk communication
    • Uncertainty
    • Worldviews

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
    • Physiology (medical)

    Cite this

    Seeing What You Want to See : How Imprecise Uncertainty Ranges Enhance Motivated Reasoning. / Dieckmann, Nathan; Gregory, Robin; Peters, Ellen; Hartman, Robert.

    In: Risk Analysis, 2016.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{334653fad85a4e77b44dac805c023473,
    title = "Seeing What You Want to See: How Imprecise Uncertainty Ranges Enhance Motivated Reasoning",
    abstract = "In this article, we consider a novel criterion for evaluating representations of uncertainty ranges, namely, the extent to which a representation enhances motivated reasoning. In two studies, we show that perceptions of the distribution underlying ambiguous numerical ranges are affected by the motivations and worldviews of end users. This motivated reasoning effect remained after controlling for objective numeracy and fluid intelligence but was attenuated when the correct interpretation was made clear. We suggest that analysts and communicators explicitly consider the potential for motivated evaluation when evaluating uncertainty displays.",
    keywords = "Motivated reasoning, Risk communication, Uncertainty, Worldviews",
    author = "Nathan Dieckmann and Robin Gregory and Ellen Peters and Robert Hartman",
    year = "2016",
    doi = "10.1111/risa.12639",
    language = "English (US)",
    journal = "Risk Analysis",
    issn = "0272-4332",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Seeing What You Want to See

    T2 - How Imprecise Uncertainty Ranges Enhance Motivated Reasoning

    AU - Dieckmann, Nathan

    AU - Gregory, Robin

    AU - Peters, Ellen

    AU - Hartman, Robert

    PY - 2016

    Y1 - 2016

    N2 - In this article, we consider a novel criterion for evaluating representations of uncertainty ranges, namely, the extent to which a representation enhances motivated reasoning. In two studies, we show that perceptions of the distribution underlying ambiguous numerical ranges are affected by the motivations and worldviews of end users. This motivated reasoning effect remained after controlling for objective numeracy and fluid intelligence but was attenuated when the correct interpretation was made clear. We suggest that analysts and communicators explicitly consider the potential for motivated evaluation when evaluating uncertainty displays.

    AB - In this article, we consider a novel criterion for evaluating representations of uncertainty ranges, namely, the extent to which a representation enhances motivated reasoning. In two studies, we show that perceptions of the distribution underlying ambiguous numerical ranges are affected by the motivations and worldviews of end users. This motivated reasoning effect remained after controlling for objective numeracy and fluid intelligence but was attenuated when the correct interpretation was made clear. We suggest that analysts and communicators explicitly consider the potential for motivated evaluation when evaluating uncertainty displays.

    KW - Motivated reasoning

    KW - Risk communication

    KW - Uncertainty

    KW - Worldviews

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992349082&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84992349082&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1111/risa.12639

    DO - 10.1111/risa.12639

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:84992349082

    JO - Risk Analysis

    JF - Risk Analysis

    SN - 0272-4332

    ER -