Abstract
54 female Ss first learned a paired adjective list and were given poker chips for correct responses. All Ss then learned a 2nd task, a nonsense syllable list, to the same criterion. 1 group exchanged tokens for 1 of 3 types of reward between Tasks 1 and 2 (generalized reinforcement), a 2nd group received only 1 type of reward (secondary reinforcement), and a 3rd could not exchange the tokens. Generalized reinforcement is somewhat more effective than secondary reinforcement in human verbal learning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 400-404 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | Journal of Experimental Psychology |
Volume | 58 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Nov 1959 |
Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- LEARNING & MEMORY
- REINFORCEMENT/POSITIVE, GENERALIZED, VS. SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT
- REINFORCEMENT/SECONDARY, VS. GENERALIZED REINFORCEMENT
- VERBATIM LEARNING, REINFORCEMENT IN, SECONDARY VS. GENERALIZED
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Medicine(all)