Secondary and generalized reinforcement in human learning

Frederick H. Kanfer, Joseph Matarazzo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

54 female Ss first learned a paired adjective list and were given poker chips for correct responses. All Ss then learned a 2nd task, a nonsense syllable list, to the same criterion. 1 group exchanged tokens for 1 of 3 types of reward between Tasks 1 and 2 (generalized reinforcement), a 2nd group received only 1 type of reward (secondary reinforcement), and a 3rd could not exchange the tokens. Generalized reinforcement is somewhat more effective than secondary reinforcement in human verbal learning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)400-404
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology
Volume58
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1959
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Learning
Reward
Verbal Learning
Reinforcement (Psychology)

Keywords

  • LEARNING & MEMORY
  • REINFORCEMENT/POSITIVE, GENERALIZED, VS. SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT
  • REINFORCEMENT/SECONDARY, VS. GENERALIZED REINFORCEMENT
  • VERBATIM LEARNING, REINFORCEMENT IN, SECONDARY VS. GENERALIZED

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Secondary and generalized reinforcement in human learning. / Kanfer, Frederick H.; Matarazzo, Joseph.

In: Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol. 58, No. 5, 11.1959, p. 400-404.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kanfer, Frederick H. ; Matarazzo, Joseph. / Secondary and generalized reinforcement in human learning. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1959 ; Vol. 58, No. 5. pp. 400-404.
@article{24a6200b9d654a6492a5c7bc30e8ffbb,
title = "Secondary and generalized reinforcement in human learning",
abstract = "54 female Ss first learned a paired adjective list and were given poker chips for correct responses. All Ss then learned a 2nd task, a nonsense syllable list, to the same criterion. 1 group exchanged tokens for 1 of 3 types of reward between Tasks 1 and 2 (generalized reinforcement), a 2nd group received only 1 type of reward (secondary reinforcement), and a 3rd could not exchange the tokens. Generalized reinforcement is somewhat more effective than secondary reinforcement in human verbal learning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).",
keywords = "LEARNING & MEMORY, REINFORCEMENT/POSITIVE, GENERALIZED, VS. SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT, REINFORCEMENT/SECONDARY, VS. GENERALIZED REINFORCEMENT, VERBATIM LEARNING, REINFORCEMENT IN, SECONDARY VS. GENERALIZED",
author = "Kanfer, {Frederick H.} and Joseph Matarazzo",
year = "1959",
month = "11",
doi = "10.1037/h0040377",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "58",
pages = "400--404",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Psychology",
issn = "0022-1015",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Secondary and generalized reinforcement in human learning

AU - Kanfer, Frederick H.

AU - Matarazzo, Joseph

PY - 1959/11

Y1 - 1959/11

N2 - 54 female Ss first learned a paired adjective list and were given poker chips for correct responses. All Ss then learned a 2nd task, a nonsense syllable list, to the same criterion. 1 group exchanged tokens for 1 of 3 types of reward between Tasks 1 and 2 (generalized reinforcement), a 2nd group received only 1 type of reward (secondary reinforcement), and a 3rd could not exchange the tokens. Generalized reinforcement is somewhat more effective than secondary reinforcement in human verbal learning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

AB - 54 female Ss first learned a paired adjective list and were given poker chips for correct responses. All Ss then learned a 2nd task, a nonsense syllable list, to the same criterion. 1 group exchanged tokens for 1 of 3 types of reward between Tasks 1 and 2 (generalized reinforcement), a 2nd group received only 1 type of reward (secondary reinforcement), and a 3rd could not exchange the tokens. Generalized reinforcement is somewhat more effective than secondary reinforcement in human verbal learning. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).

KW - LEARNING & MEMORY

KW - REINFORCEMENT/POSITIVE, GENERALIZED, VS. SECONDARY REINFORCEMENT

KW - REINFORCEMENT/SECONDARY, VS. GENERALIZED REINFORCEMENT

KW - VERBATIM LEARNING, REINFORCEMENT IN, SECONDARY VS. GENERALIZED

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=58149439010&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=58149439010&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/h0040377

DO - 10.1037/h0040377

M3 - Article

VL - 58

SP - 400

EP - 404

JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology

JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology

SN - 0022-1015

IS - 5

ER -