TY - JOUR
T1 - Screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus
T2 - A systematic review for the U.S. preventive services task force
AU - Selph, Shelle
AU - Dana, Trac
AU - Blazina, Ia
AU - Bougatsos, Christin
AU - Patel, Heta
AU - Chou, Roge
PY - 2015/6/2
Y1 - 2015/6/2
N2 - Background: Screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus could lead to earlier identification and treatment of asymptomatic diabetes, impaired fasting glucose (IFG), or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), potentially resulting in improved outcomes. Purpose: To update the 2008 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force review on diabetes screening in adults. Data Sources: Cochrane databases and MEDLINE (2007 through October 2014) and relevant studies from previous Task Force reviews. Study Selection: Randomized, controlled trials; controlled, observational studies; and systematic reviews. Data Extraction: Data were abstracted by 1 investigator and checked by a second; 2 investigators independently assessed study quality. Data Synthesis: In 2 trials, screening for diabetes was associated with no 10-year mortality benefit versus no screening (hazard ratio, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.90 to 1.25]). Sixteen trials consistently found that treatment of IFG or IGT was associated with delayed progression to diabetes. Most trials of treatment of IFG or IGT found no effects on all-cause or cardiovascular mortality, although lifestyle modification was associated with decreased risk for both outcomes after 23 years in 1 trial. For screen-detected diabetes, 1 trial found no effect of an intensive multifactorial intervention on risk for all-cause or cardiovascular mortality versus standard control. In diabetes that was not specifically screendetected, 9 systematic reviews found that intensive glucose control did not reduce risk for all-cause or cardiovascular mortality and results for intensive blood pressure control were inconsistent.
AB - Background: Screening for type 2 diabetes mellitus could lead to earlier identification and treatment of asymptomatic diabetes, impaired fasting glucose (IFG), or impaired glucose tolerance (IGT), potentially resulting in improved outcomes. Purpose: To update the 2008 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force review on diabetes screening in adults. Data Sources: Cochrane databases and MEDLINE (2007 through October 2014) and relevant studies from previous Task Force reviews. Study Selection: Randomized, controlled trials; controlled, observational studies; and systematic reviews. Data Extraction: Data were abstracted by 1 investigator and checked by a second; 2 investigators independently assessed study quality. Data Synthesis: In 2 trials, screening for diabetes was associated with no 10-year mortality benefit versus no screening (hazard ratio, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.90 to 1.25]). Sixteen trials consistently found that treatment of IFG or IGT was associated with delayed progression to diabetes. Most trials of treatment of IFG or IGT found no effects on all-cause or cardiovascular mortality, although lifestyle modification was associated with decreased risk for both outcomes after 23 years in 1 trial. For screen-detected diabetes, 1 trial found no effect of an intensive multifactorial intervention on risk for all-cause or cardiovascular mortality versus standard control. In diabetes that was not specifically screendetected, 9 systematic reviews found that intensive glucose control did not reduce risk for all-cause or cardiovascular mortality and results for intensive blood pressure control were inconsistent.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84932125338&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84932125338&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.7326/M14-2221
DO - 10.7326/M14-2221
M3 - Review article
C2 - 25867111
AN - SCOPUS:84932125338
SN - 0003-4819
VL - 162
SP - 765
EP - 776
JO - Annals of Internal Medicine
JF - Annals of Internal Medicine
IS - 11
ER -