Screening and treatment of thyroid dysfunction: An evidence review for the U.S. preventive services task force

John (Bruin) Rugge, Christina Bougatsos, Roger Chou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

68 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: In 2004, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force found insufficient evidence to recommend thyroid screening. Purpose: To update the 2004 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force review on the benefits and harms of screening and treatment of subclinical and undiagnosed overt hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism in adults without goiter or thyroid nodules. Data Sources: MEDLINE and Cochrane databases through July 2014. Study Selection: Randomized, controlled trials and observational studies of screening and treatment. Data Extraction: One investigator abstracted data, and a second investigator confirmed; 2 investigators independently assessed study quality. Data Synthesis: No study directly assessed benefits and harms of screening versus no screening. For subclinical hypothyroidism (based on thyroid-stimulating hormone levels of 4.1 to 11.0 mIU/ L), 1 fair-quality cohort study found that treatment of subclinical hypothyroidism was associated with decreased risk for coronary heart disease events versus no treatment. No study found that treatment was associated with improved quality of life, cognitive function, blood pressure, or body mass index versus no treatment. Effects of treatment versus no treatment showed potential beneficial effects on lipid levels, but effects were inconsistent, not statistically significant in most studies, and of uncertain clinical significance (difference, -0.7 to 0 mmol/L [-28 to 0 mg/dL] for total cholesterol levels and -0.6 to 0.1 mmol/L [-22 to 2 mg/dL] for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels). Treatment harms were poorly studied and sparsely reported. Two poorquality studies evaluated treatment of subclinical hyperthyroidism but examined intermediate outcomes. No study evaluated treatment versus no treatment of screen-detected, undiagnosed overt thyroid dysfunction. Limitation: English-language articles only, no treatment study performed in the United States, and small trials with short duration that used different dosage protocols. Conclusion: More research is needed to determine the clinical benefits associated with thyroid screening. Primary Funding Source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)35-45
Number of pages11
JournalAnnals of Internal Medicine
Volume162
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 6 2015

Fingerprint

Advisory Committees
Hypothyroidism
Thyroid Gland
Research Personnel
Hyperthyroidism
Thyroid Nodule
Information Storage and Retrieval
Health Services Research
Goiter
Thyrotropin
MEDLINE
LDL Cholesterol
Cognition
Observational Studies
Coronary Disease
Body Mass Index
Cohort Studies
Language
Randomized Controlled Trials
Cholesterol

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Screening and treatment of thyroid dysfunction : An evidence review for the U.S. preventive services task force. / Rugge, John (Bruin); Bougatsos, Christina; Chou, Roger.

In: Annals of Internal Medicine, Vol. 162, No. 1, 06.01.2015, p. 35-45.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{d6a51d36c8a443b38c1c6900d4d4f793,
title = "Screening and treatment of thyroid dysfunction: An evidence review for the U.S. preventive services task force",
abstract = "Background: In 2004, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force found insufficient evidence to recommend thyroid screening. Purpose: To update the 2004 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force review on the benefits and harms of screening and treatment of subclinical and undiagnosed overt hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism in adults without goiter or thyroid nodules. Data Sources: MEDLINE and Cochrane databases through July 2014. Study Selection: Randomized, controlled trials and observational studies of screening and treatment. Data Extraction: One investigator abstracted data, and a second investigator confirmed; 2 investigators independently assessed study quality. Data Synthesis: No study directly assessed benefits and harms of screening versus no screening. For subclinical hypothyroidism (based on thyroid-stimulating hormone levels of 4.1 to 11.0 mIU/ L), 1 fair-quality cohort study found that treatment of subclinical hypothyroidism was associated with decreased risk for coronary heart disease events versus no treatment. No study found that treatment was associated with improved quality of life, cognitive function, blood pressure, or body mass index versus no treatment. Effects of treatment versus no treatment showed potential beneficial effects on lipid levels, but effects were inconsistent, not statistically significant in most studies, and of uncertain clinical significance (difference, -0.7 to 0 mmol/L [-28 to 0 mg/dL] for total cholesterol levels and -0.6 to 0.1 mmol/L [-22 to 2 mg/dL] for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels). Treatment harms were poorly studied and sparsely reported. Two poorquality studies evaluated treatment of subclinical hyperthyroidism but examined intermediate outcomes. No study evaluated treatment versus no treatment of screen-detected, undiagnosed overt thyroid dysfunction. Limitation: English-language articles only, no treatment study performed in the United States, and small trials with short duration that used different dosage protocols. Conclusion: More research is needed to determine the clinical benefits associated with thyroid screening. Primary Funding Source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.",
author = "Rugge, {John (Bruin)} and Christina Bougatsos and Roger Chou",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "6",
doi = "10.7326/M14-1456",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "162",
pages = "35--45",
journal = "Annals of Internal Medicine",
issn = "0003-4819",
publisher = "American College of Physicians",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Screening and treatment of thyroid dysfunction

T2 - An evidence review for the U.S. preventive services task force

AU - Rugge, John (Bruin)

AU - Bougatsos, Christina

AU - Chou, Roger

PY - 2015/1/6

Y1 - 2015/1/6

N2 - Background: In 2004, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force found insufficient evidence to recommend thyroid screening. Purpose: To update the 2004 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force review on the benefits and harms of screening and treatment of subclinical and undiagnosed overt hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism in adults without goiter or thyroid nodules. Data Sources: MEDLINE and Cochrane databases through July 2014. Study Selection: Randomized, controlled trials and observational studies of screening and treatment. Data Extraction: One investigator abstracted data, and a second investigator confirmed; 2 investigators independently assessed study quality. Data Synthesis: No study directly assessed benefits and harms of screening versus no screening. For subclinical hypothyroidism (based on thyroid-stimulating hormone levels of 4.1 to 11.0 mIU/ L), 1 fair-quality cohort study found that treatment of subclinical hypothyroidism was associated with decreased risk for coronary heart disease events versus no treatment. No study found that treatment was associated with improved quality of life, cognitive function, blood pressure, or body mass index versus no treatment. Effects of treatment versus no treatment showed potential beneficial effects on lipid levels, but effects were inconsistent, not statistically significant in most studies, and of uncertain clinical significance (difference, -0.7 to 0 mmol/L [-28 to 0 mg/dL] for total cholesterol levels and -0.6 to 0.1 mmol/L [-22 to 2 mg/dL] for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels). Treatment harms were poorly studied and sparsely reported. Two poorquality studies evaluated treatment of subclinical hyperthyroidism but examined intermediate outcomes. No study evaluated treatment versus no treatment of screen-detected, undiagnosed overt thyroid dysfunction. Limitation: English-language articles only, no treatment study performed in the United States, and small trials with short duration that used different dosage protocols. Conclusion: More research is needed to determine the clinical benefits associated with thyroid screening. Primary Funding Source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

AB - Background: In 2004, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force found insufficient evidence to recommend thyroid screening. Purpose: To update the 2004 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force review on the benefits and harms of screening and treatment of subclinical and undiagnosed overt hypothyroidism and hyperthyroidism in adults without goiter or thyroid nodules. Data Sources: MEDLINE and Cochrane databases through July 2014. Study Selection: Randomized, controlled trials and observational studies of screening and treatment. Data Extraction: One investigator abstracted data, and a second investigator confirmed; 2 investigators independently assessed study quality. Data Synthesis: No study directly assessed benefits and harms of screening versus no screening. For subclinical hypothyroidism (based on thyroid-stimulating hormone levels of 4.1 to 11.0 mIU/ L), 1 fair-quality cohort study found that treatment of subclinical hypothyroidism was associated with decreased risk for coronary heart disease events versus no treatment. No study found that treatment was associated with improved quality of life, cognitive function, blood pressure, or body mass index versus no treatment. Effects of treatment versus no treatment showed potential beneficial effects on lipid levels, but effects were inconsistent, not statistically significant in most studies, and of uncertain clinical significance (difference, -0.7 to 0 mmol/L [-28 to 0 mg/dL] for total cholesterol levels and -0.6 to 0.1 mmol/L [-22 to 2 mg/dL] for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels). Treatment harms were poorly studied and sparsely reported. Two poorquality studies evaluated treatment of subclinical hyperthyroidism but examined intermediate outcomes. No study evaluated treatment versus no treatment of screen-detected, undiagnosed overt thyroid dysfunction. Limitation: English-language articles only, no treatment study performed in the United States, and small trials with short duration that used different dosage protocols. Conclusion: More research is needed to determine the clinical benefits associated with thyroid screening. Primary Funding Source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925019908&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84925019908&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7326/M14-1456

DO - 10.7326/M14-1456

M3 - Article

C2 - 25347444

AN - SCOPUS:84925019908

VL - 162

SP - 35

EP - 45

JO - Annals of Internal Medicine

JF - Annals of Internal Medicine

SN - 0003-4819

IS - 1

ER -