Scope of practice among recent family medicine residency graduates

M (Patrice) Eiff, Joyce Hollander-Rodriguez, Joe Skariah, Richard Young, Elaine Waller, Eve Dexter, Thomas R. O’Neill, Michael R. Peabody, Larry A. Green, Patricia (Patty) Carney

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The scope of practice among primary care providers varies, and studies have shown that family physicians’ scope may be shrinking. We studied the scope of practice among graduates of residencies associated with Preparing the Personal Physician for Practice (P4) and how length of training and individualized education innovations may influence scope. METHODS: We surveyed graduates 18 months after residency between 2008 and 2014. The survey measured self-reported practice characteristics, scope of practice and career satisfaction. We assessed scope using individual practice components (25 clinical activities, 30 procedures) and a scaled score (P4-SOP) that measured breadth of practice scope. We conducted subgroup analyses according to exposure to innovations over the project period and exposure to specific innovations. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in mean P4-SOP scores between the Pre and Full P4 groups. Compared to national data, P4 graduates reported higher rates for vaginal deliveries (19.3% vs 9.2%), adult inpatient care (48.5% vs 33.7%) and nursing home care (25.4 vs 11.7%) in practice. Graduates exposed to innovations that lengthened training, compared to standard training length, were more likely to include adult hospital care (58.2% vs 38.5%, P=0.002), adult ICU care (30.6% vs 19.2%, P=0.047) and newborn resuscitation (25.6% vs 14%, P=0.028) in their practice and performed 19/30 procedures at higher rates. Graduates of programs with individualized training innovations reported no significant differences in scope compared to graduates without this innovation. CONCLUSIONS: Graduates of residencies engaged in significant educational redesign report a broad scope of practice. Innovations around the length of training may broaden scope and individualized education appears not to constrict scope.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)607-617
Number of pages11
JournalFamily Medicine
Volume49
Issue number8
StatePublished - Sep 1 2017

Fingerprint

Internship and Residency
Medicine
Education
Family Physicians
Home Care Services
Nursing Care
Nursing Homes
Resuscitation
Inpatients
Primary Health Care
Newborn Infant
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Family Practice

Cite this

Scope of practice among recent family medicine residency graduates. / Eiff, M (Patrice); Hollander-Rodriguez, Joyce; Skariah, Joe; Young, Richard; Waller, Elaine; Dexter, Eve; O’Neill, Thomas R.; Peabody, Michael R.; Green, Larry A.; Carney, Patricia (Patty).

In: Family Medicine, Vol. 49, No. 8, 01.09.2017, p. 607-617.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Eiff, MP, Hollander-Rodriguez, J, Skariah, J, Young, R, Waller, E, Dexter, E, O’Neill, TR, Peabody, MR, Green, LA & Carney, PP 2017, 'Scope of practice among recent family medicine residency graduates', Family Medicine, vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 607-617.
Eiff MP, Hollander-Rodriguez J, Skariah J, Young R, Waller E, Dexter E et al. Scope of practice among recent family medicine residency graduates. Family Medicine. 2017 Sep 1;49(8):607-617.
Eiff, M (Patrice) ; Hollander-Rodriguez, Joyce ; Skariah, Joe ; Young, Richard ; Waller, Elaine ; Dexter, Eve ; O’Neill, Thomas R. ; Peabody, Michael R. ; Green, Larry A. ; Carney, Patricia (Patty). / Scope of practice among recent family medicine residency graduates. In: Family Medicine. 2017 ; Vol. 49, No. 8. pp. 607-617.
@article{e81a25b7876148d288b2d74a823f6b13,
title = "Scope of practice among recent family medicine residency graduates",
abstract = "BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The scope of practice among primary care providers varies, and studies have shown that family physicians’ scope may be shrinking. We studied the scope of practice among graduates of residencies associated with Preparing the Personal Physician for Practice (P4) and how length of training and individualized education innovations may influence scope. METHODS: We surveyed graduates 18 months after residency between 2008 and 2014. The survey measured self-reported practice characteristics, scope of practice and career satisfaction. We assessed scope using individual practice components (25 clinical activities, 30 procedures) and a scaled score (P4-SOP) that measured breadth of practice scope. We conducted subgroup analyses according to exposure to innovations over the project period and exposure to specific innovations. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in mean P4-SOP scores between the Pre and Full P4 groups. Compared to national data, P4 graduates reported higher rates for vaginal deliveries (19.3{\%} vs 9.2{\%}), adult inpatient care (48.5{\%} vs 33.7{\%}) and nursing home care (25.4 vs 11.7{\%}) in practice. Graduates exposed to innovations that lengthened training, compared to standard training length, were more likely to include adult hospital care (58.2{\%} vs 38.5{\%}, P=0.002), adult ICU care (30.6{\%} vs 19.2{\%}, P=0.047) and newborn resuscitation (25.6{\%} vs 14{\%}, P=0.028) in their practice and performed 19/30 procedures at higher rates. Graduates of programs with individualized training innovations reported no significant differences in scope compared to graduates without this innovation. CONCLUSIONS: Graduates of residencies engaged in significant educational redesign report a broad scope of practice. Innovations around the length of training may broaden scope and individualized education appears not to constrict scope.",
author = "Eiff, {M (Patrice)} and Joyce Hollander-Rodriguez and Joe Skariah and Richard Young and Elaine Waller and Eve Dexter and O’Neill, {Thomas R.} and Peabody, {Michael R.} and Green, {Larry A.} and Carney, {Patricia (Patty)}",
year = "2017",
month = "9",
day = "1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "49",
pages = "607--617",
journal = "Family Medicine",
issn = "0742-3225",
publisher = "Society of Teachers of Family Medicine",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scope of practice among recent family medicine residency graduates

AU - Eiff, M (Patrice)

AU - Hollander-Rodriguez, Joyce

AU - Skariah, Joe

AU - Young, Richard

AU - Waller, Elaine

AU - Dexter, Eve

AU - O’Neill, Thomas R.

AU - Peabody, Michael R.

AU - Green, Larry A.

AU - Carney, Patricia (Patty)

PY - 2017/9/1

Y1 - 2017/9/1

N2 - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The scope of practice among primary care providers varies, and studies have shown that family physicians’ scope may be shrinking. We studied the scope of practice among graduates of residencies associated with Preparing the Personal Physician for Practice (P4) and how length of training and individualized education innovations may influence scope. METHODS: We surveyed graduates 18 months after residency between 2008 and 2014. The survey measured self-reported practice characteristics, scope of practice and career satisfaction. We assessed scope using individual practice components (25 clinical activities, 30 procedures) and a scaled score (P4-SOP) that measured breadth of practice scope. We conducted subgroup analyses according to exposure to innovations over the project period and exposure to specific innovations. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in mean P4-SOP scores between the Pre and Full P4 groups. Compared to national data, P4 graduates reported higher rates for vaginal deliveries (19.3% vs 9.2%), adult inpatient care (48.5% vs 33.7%) and nursing home care (25.4 vs 11.7%) in practice. Graduates exposed to innovations that lengthened training, compared to standard training length, were more likely to include adult hospital care (58.2% vs 38.5%, P=0.002), adult ICU care (30.6% vs 19.2%, P=0.047) and newborn resuscitation (25.6% vs 14%, P=0.028) in their practice and performed 19/30 procedures at higher rates. Graduates of programs with individualized training innovations reported no significant differences in scope compared to graduates without this innovation. CONCLUSIONS: Graduates of residencies engaged in significant educational redesign report a broad scope of practice. Innovations around the length of training may broaden scope and individualized education appears not to constrict scope.

AB - BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The scope of practice among primary care providers varies, and studies have shown that family physicians’ scope may be shrinking. We studied the scope of practice among graduates of residencies associated with Preparing the Personal Physician for Practice (P4) and how length of training and individualized education innovations may influence scope. METHODS: We surveyed graduates 18 months after residency between 2008 and 2014. The survey measured self-reported practice characteristics, scope of practice and career satisfaction. We assessed scope using individual practice components (25 clinical activities, 30 procedures) and a scaled score (P4-SOP) that measured breadth of practice scope. We conducted subgroup analyses according to exposure to innovations over the project period and exposure to specific innovations. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in mean P4-SOP scores between the Pre and Full P4 groups. Compared to national data, P4 graduates reported higher rates for vaginal deliveries (19.3% vs 9.2%), adult inpatient care (48.5% vs 33.7%) and nursing home care (25.4 vs 11.7%) in practice. Graduates exposed to innovations that lengthened training, compared to standard training length, were more likely to include adult hospital care (58.2% vs 38.5%, P=0.002), adult ICU care (30.6% vs 19.2%, P=0.047) and newborn resuscitation (25.6% vs 14%, P=0.028) in their practice and performed 19/30 procedures at higher rates. Graduates of programs with individualized training innovations reported no significant differences in scope compared to graduates without this innovation. CONCLUSIONS: Graduates of residencies engaged in significant educational redesign report a broad scope of practice. Innovations around the length of training may broaden scope and individualized education appears not to constrict scope.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028956143&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028956143&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 28953292

AN - SCOPUS:85028956143

VL - 49

SP - 607

EP - 617

JO - Family Medicine

JF - Family Medicine

SN - 0742-3225

IS - 8

ER -