Scientific Challenges in Postmarketing Surveillance of Ocular Adverse Drug Reactions

Frederick W. Fraunfelder, Frederick T. Fraunfelder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

22 Scopus citations


Purpose: To highlight the challenges of postmarketing surveillance for drug-related adverse events in the practice of ophthalmology. Design: A retrospective review of the medical literature and postmarketing surveillance databases. Methods: MEDLINE literature review of sildenafil-associated or amiodarone-associated optic neuropathy and chloramphenicol-associated blood dyscrasias. Results: Sildenafil, amiodarone, and chloramphenicol may all cause adverse ocular events; however, the data are not conclusive. Conclusions: Reports in peer-reviewed medical journals may be proven incorrect over time. For drug-induced adverse ocular events, there is little true science after the drug reaches the marketplace, so the percentage of incorrect conclusions may be high. Clinicians should be wary of reports of adverse ocular effects until data are confirmed by multiple authors over the long-term. Even so, spontaneous reports from postmarketing surveillance databases may be the first and only signal of an adverse ocular event.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)145-149.e2
JournalAmerican journal of ophthalmology
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 2007

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology


Dive into the research topics of 'Scientific Challenges in Postmarketing Surveillance of Ocular Adverse Drug Reactions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this