SBAR M&M: A feasible, reliable, and valid tool to assess the quality of, surgical morbidity and mortality conference presentations

Erica Mitchell, Dae Y. Lee, Sonal Arora, Karen L. Kwong, Timothy Liem, Gregory Landry, Gregory (Greg) Moneta, Nick Sevdalis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

22 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Surgical Morbidity and Mortality (M&M) conference is considered the golden hour of surgical education. However, evaluation methods for ensuring that quality M&M presentations efficiently contribute to resident education have not been clearly defined. To provide surgical trainees with the skills required to present a quality M&M presentation it is essential to have a robust tool to measure presentation skill and guide formative feedback. A prospective observational study was conducted to develop an assessment tool for M&M conference. Literature review and expert consensus provided content for tool development. The tool, created using the situation, background, assessment, and recommendation format, was refined successively based on assessor feedback and assessed for reliability (internal consistency, interassessor reliability) and construct validity. Three successive iterations of the tool were developed. Internal consistency and interassessor reliability improved from the first to third versions. A trend also was shown for increasing construct validity with the third iteration of the tool. A psychometrically robust assessment tool based on the situation, background, assessment, and recommendation format was developed and validated to identify and improve the overall quality and educational value of the surgical M&M conference.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)26-31
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Surgery
Volume203
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2012

Fingerprint

Morbidity
Mortality
Education
Reproducibility of Results
Observational Studies
Consensus
Prospective Studies
Formative Feedback

Keywords

  • Assessment instrument
  • Assessment tool
  • Educational value
  • Morbidity and mortality conference
  • Morbidity and mortality presentations
  • SBAR
  • Surgical M&M conference
  • Surgical morbidity and mortality conference

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

SBAR M&M : A feasible, reliable, and valid tool to assess the quality of, surgical morbidity and mortality conference presentations. / Mitchell, Erica; Lee, Dae Y.; Arora, Sonal; Kwong, Karen L.; Liem, Timothy; Landry, Gregory; Moneta, Gregory (Greg); Sevdalis, Nick.

In: American Journal of Surgery, Vol. 203, No. 1, 01.2012, p. 26-31.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{de57f812a4cf40468c1833f5000e2395,
title = "SBAR M&M: A feasible, reliable, and valid tool to assess the quality of, surgical morbidity and mortality conference presentations",
abstract = "The Surgical Morbidity and Mortality (M&M) conference is considered the golden hour of surgical education. However, evaluation methods for ensuring that quality M&M presentations efficiently contribute to resident education have not been clearly defined. To provide surgical trainees with the skills required to present a quality M&M presentation it is essential to have a robust tool to measure presentation skill and guide formative feedback. A prospective observational study was conducted to develop an assessment tool for M&M conference. Literature review and expert consensus provided content for tool development. The tool, created using the situation, background, assessment, and recommendation format, was refined successively based on assessor feedback and assessed for reliability (internal consistency, interassessor reliability) and construct validity. Three successive iterations of the tool were developed. Internal consistency and interassessor reliability improved from the first to third versions. A trend also was shown for increasing construct validity with the third iteration of the tool. A psychometrically robust assessment tool based on the situation, background, assessment, and recommendation format was developed and validated to identify and improve the overall quality and educational value of the surgical M&M conference.",
keywords = "Assessment instrument, Assessment tool, Educational value, Morbidity and mortality conference, Morbidity and mortality presentations, SBAR, Surgical M&M conference, Surgical morbidity and mortality conference",
author = "Erica Mitchell and Lee, {Dae Y.} and Sonal Arora and Kwong, {Karen L.} and Timothy Liem and Gregory Landry and Moneta, {Gregory (Greg)} and Nick Sevdalis",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.07.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "203",
pages = "26--31",
journal = "American Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0002-9610",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - SBAR M&M

T2 - A feasible, reliable, and valid tool to assess the quality of, surgical morbidity and mortality conference presentations

AU - Mitchell, Erica

AU - Lee, Dae Y.

AU - Arora, Sonal

AU - Kwong, Karen L.

AU - Liem, Timothy

AU - Landry, Gregory

AU - Moneta, Gregory (Greg)

AU - Sevdalis, Nick

PY - 2012/1

Y1 - 2012/1

N2 - The Surgical Morbidity and Mortality (M&M) conference is considered the golden hour of surgical education. However, evaluation methods for ensuring that quality M&M presentations efficiently contribute to resident education have not been clearly defined. To provide surgical trainees with the skills required to present a quality M&M presentation it is essential to have a robust tool to measure presentation skill and guide formative feedback. A prospective observational study was conducted to develop an assessment tool for M&M conference. Literature review and expert consensus provided content for tool development. The tool, created using the situation, background, assessment, and recommendation format, was refined successively based on assessor feedback and assessed for reliability (internal consistency, interassessor reliability) and construct validity. Three successive iterations of the tool were developed. Internal consistency and interassessor reliability improved from the first to third versions. A trend also was shown for increasing construct validity with the third iteration of the tool. A psychometrically robust assessment tool based on the situation, background, assessment, and recommendation format was developed and validated to identify and improve the overall quality and educational value of the surgical M&M conference.

AB - The Surgical Morbidity and Mortality (M&M) conference is considered the golden hour of surgical education. However, evaluation methods for ensuring that quality M&M presentations efficiently contribute to resident education have not been clearly defined. To provide surgical trainees with the skills required to present a quality M&M presentation it is essential to have a robust tool to measure presentation skill and guide formative feedback. A prospective observational study was conducted to develop an assessment tool for M&M conference. Literature review and expert consensus provided content for tool development. The tool, created using the situation, background, assessment, and recommendation format, was refined successively based on assessor feedback and assessed for reliability (internal consistency, interassessor reliability) and construct validity. Three successive iterations of the tool were developed. Internal consistency and interassessor reliability improved from the first to third versions. A trend also was shown for increasing construct validity with the third iteration of the tool. A psychometrically robust assessment tool based on the situation, background, assessment, and recommendation format was developed and validated to identify and improve the overall quality and educational value of the surgical M&M conference.

KW - Assessment instrument

KW - Assessment tool

KW - Educational value

KW - Morbidity and mortality conference

KW - Morbidity and mortality presentations

KW - SBAR

KW - Surgical M&M conference

KW - Surgical morbidity and mortality conference

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=83555162560&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=83555162560&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.07.008

DO - 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2011.07.008

M3 - Article

C2 - 22088267

AN - SCOPUS:83555162560

VL - 203

SP - 26

EP - 31

JO - American Journal of Surgery

JF - American Journal of Surgery

SN - 0002-9610

IS - 1

ER -