Same trials, different conclusions: sorting out discrepancies between reviews on interventional procedures of the spine

Roger Chou

doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2009.05.003

Same trials, different conclusions: sorting out discrepancies between reviews on interventional procedures of the spine

Roger Chou

Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

COMMENTARY ON: Levin JH. Prospective, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trials in interventional spine: what the highest quality literature tells us. Spine J 2009;9:690-703 (in this issue).

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	679-689
Number of pages	11
Journal	Spine Journal
Volume	9
Issue number	8
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2009.05.003
State	Published - Aug 2009

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Surgery
Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
Clinical Neurology

Access to Document

10.1016/j.spinee.2009.05.003

Cite this

@article{ba8cc227ab5a469d9a78569cbc58f6a1,

title = "Same trials, different conclusions: sorting out discrepancies between reviews on interventional procedures of the spine",

abstract = "COMMENTARY ON: Levin JH. Prospective, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trials in interventional spine: what the highest quality literature tells us. Spine J 2009;9:690-703 (in this issue).",

author = "Roger Chou",

note = "Funding Information: Author disclosures: RC (research support from the American Pain Society). ",

year = "2009",

month = aug,

doi = "10.1016/j.spinee.2009.05.003",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "9",

pages = "679--689",

journal = "Spine Journal",

issn = "1529-9430",

publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Same trials, different conclusions

T2 - sorting out discrepancies between reviews on interventional procedures of the spine

AU - Chou, Roger

N1 - Funding Information: Author disclosures: RC (research support from the American Pain Society).

PY - 2009/8

Y1 - 2009/8

N2 - COMMENTARY ON: Levin JH. Prospective, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trials in interventional spine: what the highest quality literature tells us. Spine J 2009;9:690-703 (in this issue).

AB - COMMENTARY ON: Levin JH. Prospective, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trials in interventional spine: what the highest quality literature tells us. Spine J 2009;9:690-703 (in this issue).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67651083412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67651083412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.05.003

DO - 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.05.003

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 19540814

AN - SCOPUS:67651083412

SN - 1529-9430

VL - 9

SP - 679

EP - 689

JO - Spine Journal

JF - Spine Journal

IS - 8

ER -

Same trials, different conclusions: sorting out discrepancies between reviews on interventional procedures of the spine

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this