Same trials, different conclusions: sorting out discrepancies between reviews on interventional procedures of the spine

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

COMMENTARY ON: Levin JH. Prospective, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trials in interventional spine: what the highest quality literature tells us. Spine J 2009;9:690-703 (in this issue).

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)679-689
Number of pages11
JournalSpine Journal
Volume9
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2009

Fingerprint

Spine
Randomized Controlled Trials
Placebos

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Surgery

Cite this

Same trials, different conclusions : sorting out discrepancies between reviews on interventional procedures of the spine. / Chou, Roger.

In: Spine Journal, Vol. 9, No. 8, 08.2009, p. 679-689.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{ba8cc227ab5a469d9a78569cbc58f6a1,
title = "Same trials, different conclusions: sorting out discrepancies between reviews on interventional procedures of the spine",
abstract = "COMMENTARY ON: Levin JH. Prospective, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trials in interventional spine: what the highest quality literature tells us. Spine J 2009;9:690-703 (in this issue).",
author = "Roger Chou",
year = "2009",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.spinee.2009.05.003",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "679--689",
journal = "Spine Journal",
issn = "1529-9430",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Same trials, different conclusions

T2 - sorting out discrepancies between reviews on interventional procedures of the spine

AU - Chou, Roger

PY - 2009/8

Y1 - 2009/8

N2 - COMMENTARY ON: Levin JH. Prospective, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trials in interventional spine: what the highest quality literature tells us. Spine J 2009;9:690-703 (in this issue).

AB - COMMENTARY ON: Levin JH. Prospective, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trials in interventional spine: what the highest quality literature tells us. Spine J 2009;9:690-703 (in this issue).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67651083412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=67651083412&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.05.003

DO - 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.05.003

M3 - Article

C2 - 19540814

AN - SCOPUS:67651083412

VL - 9

SP - 679

EP - 689

JO - Spine Journal

JF - Spine Journal

SN - 1529-9430

IS - 8

ER -