Safety and Efficacy of a New Synthetic Burn Dressing: A Multicenter Study

P. William Curreri, Manubhai H. Desai, Robert H. Bartlett, David M. Heimbach, Philip Parshley, Donald Trunkey

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A three-tiered, multicenter study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a new synthetic dressing for burn injuries. The first tier compared use of the test dressing with use of a conventional topical chemotherapeutic agent; the test dressing afforded greater patient comfort, equivalent control of bacterial growth, less frequent dressing change, and possibly faster reepithelialization. Drawbacks included difficulty of application, poor adherence during the first 24 hours after injury, frequent necessity to repair cracks and fissures, and inability to easily monitor burn wounds for bacterial growth. Subsequent tiers were noncomparative but included patients with more severe injuries. The test dressing may be useful in treating superficial and moderate second-degree burns of less than 20% of the total body surface area and possibly in treating iatrogenic “burn” wounds such as donor sites. Its use on third-degree burns is not recommended.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)925-927
Number of pages3
JournalArchives of Surgery
Volume115
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 1980
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Bandages
Multicenter Studies
Safety
Wounds and Injuries
Burns
Body Surface Area
Growth
Tissue Donors

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Curreri, P. W., Desai, M. H., Bartlett, R. H., Heimbach, D. M., Parshley, P., & Trunkey, D. (1980). Safety and Efficacy of a New Synthetic Burn Dressing: A Multicenter Study. Archives of Surgery, 115(8), 925-927. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1980.01380080021004

Safety and Efficacy of a New Synthetic Burn Dressing : A Multicenter Study. / Curreri, P. William; Desai, Manubhai H.; Bartlett, Robert H.; Heimbach, David M.; Parshley, Philip; Trunkey, Donald.

In: Archives of Surgery, Vol. 115, No. 8, 1980, p. 925-927.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Curreri, PW, Desai, MH, Bartlett, RH, Heimbach, DM, Parshley, P & Trunkey, D 1980, 'Safety and Efficacy of a New Synthetic Burn Dressing: A Multicenter Study', Archives of Surgery, vol. 115, no. 8, pp. 925-927. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.1980.01380080021004
Curreri, P. William ; Desai, Manubhai H. ; Bartlett, Robert H. ; Heimbach, David M. ; Parshley, Philip ; Trunkey, Donald. / Safety and Efficacy of a New Synthetic Burn Dressing : A Multicenter Study. In: Archives of Surgery. 1980 ; Vol. 115, No. 8. pp. 925-927.
@article{908122c40208431bb0b542025a58531c,
title = "Safety and Efficacy of a New Synthetic Burn Dressing: A Multicenter Study",
abstract = "A three-tiered, multicenter study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a new synthetic dressing for burn injuries. The first tier compared use of the test dressing with use of a conventional topical chemotherapeutic agent; the test dressing afforded greater patient comfort, equivalent control of bacterial growth, less frequent dressing change, and possibly faster reepithelialization. Drawbacks included difficulty of application, poor adherence during the first 24 hours after injury, frequent necessity to repair cracks and fissures, and inability to easily monitor burn wounds for bacterial growth. Subsequent tiers were noncomparative but included patients with more severe injuries. The test dressing may be useful in treating superficial and moderate second-degree burns of less than 20{\%} of the total body surface area and possibly in treating iatrogenic “burn” wounds such as donor sites. Its use on third-degree burns is not recommended.",
author = "Curreri, {P. William} and Desai, {Manubhai H.} and Bartlett, {Robert H.} and Heimbach, {David M.} and Philip Parshley and Donald Trunkey",
year = "1980",
doi = "10.1001/archsurg.1980.01380080021004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "115",
pages = "925--927",
journal = "JAMA Surgery",
issn = "2168-6254",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Safety and Efficacy of a New Synthetic Burn Dressing

T2 - A Multicenter Study

AU - Curreri, P. William

AU - Desai, Manubhai H.

AU - Bartlett, Robert H.

AU - Heimbach, David M.

AU - Parshley, Philip

AU - Trunkey, Donald

PY - 1980

Y1 - 1980

N2 - A three-tiered, multicenter study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a new synthetic dressing for burn injuries. The first tier compared use of the test dressing with use of a conventional topical chemotherapeutic agent; the test dressing afforded greater patient comfort, equivalent control of bacterial growth, less frequent dressing change, and possibly faster reepithelialization. Drawbacks included difficulty of application, poor adherence during the first 24 hours after injury, frequent necessity to repair cracks and fissures, and inability to easily monitor burn wounds for bacterial growth. Subsequent tiers were noncomparative but included patients with more severe injuries. The test dressing may be useful in treating superficial and moderate second-degree burns of less than 20% of the total body surface area and possibly in treating iatrogenic “burn” wounds such as donor sites. Its use on third-degree burns is not recommended.

AB - A three-tiered, multicenter study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a new synthetic dressing for burn injuries. The first tier compared use of the test dressing with use of a conventional topical chemotherapeutic agent; the test dressing afforded greater patient comfort, equivalent control of bacterial growth, less frequent dressing change, and possibly faster reepithelialization. Drawbacks included difficulty of application, poor adherence during the first 24 hours after injury, frequent necessity to repair cracks and fissures, and inability to easily monitor burn wounds for bacterial growth. Subsequent tiers were noncomparative but included patients with more severe injuries. The test dressing may be useful in treating superficial and moderate second-degree burns of less than 20% of the total body surface area and possibly in treating iatrogenic “burn” wounds such as donor sites. Its use on third-degree burns is not recommended.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0018890194&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0018890194&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/archsurg.1980.01380080021004

DO - 10.1001/archsurg.1980.01380080021004

M3 - Article

C2 - 6994679

AN - SCOPUS:0018890194

VL - 115

SP - 925

EP - 927

JO - JAMA Surgery

JF - JAMA Surgery

SN - 2168-6254

IS - 8

ER -