Routine iron supplementation and screening for iron deficiency anemia in pregnancy: A systematic review for the U.S. preventive services task force

Amy Cantor, Christina Bougatsos, Tracy Dana, Ian Blazina, Marian McDonagh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

54 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Routine screening and supplementation for iron deficiency anemia (IDA) in asymptomatic, nonanemic pregnant women could improve maternal and infant health outcomes. Purpose: Update of a 2006 systematic review by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force on screening and supplementation for IDA in pregnancy. Data Sources: MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library (1996 to August 2014) and reference lists of relevant systematic reviews to identify studies published since 1996. Study Selection: English-language trials and controlled observational studies about effectiveness of screening and routine supplementation for IDA in developed countries. Data Extraction: Data extraction and quality assessment confirmed and dual-rated by a second investigator using prespecified criteria. Data Synthesis: No study directly compared clinical outcomes or harms of screening or not screening pregnant women for IDA. Twelve supplementation trials were included, and no controlled observational studies met inclusion criteria. On the basis of 11 trials, routine maternal iron supplementation had inconsistent effects on rates of cesarean delivery, small size for gestational age, and low birthweight and no effect on maternal quality of life, gestational age, Apgar scores, preterm birth, or infant mortality. Twelve trials reported improvements in maternal hematologic indices, although not all were statistically significant. Pooled analysis of 4 trials resulted in a statistically significant difference in IDA incidence at term, favoring supplementation (risk ratio, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.17 to 0.49]; I2 = 0%). Maternal iron supplementation did not affect infant iron status at 6 months. Harms, none of which were serious or had long-term consequences, were inconsistently reported in 10 of the trials, with most finding no difference between groups. Limitations: Data from trials in countries with limited generalizability to U.S. populations were included. Studies were methodologically heterogeneous, and some were small and underpowered. Conclusion: There is inconclusive evidence that routine prenatal supplementation for IDA improves maternal or infant clinical health outcomes, but supplementation may improve maternal hematologic indices. Primary Funding Source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)566-576
Number of pages11
JournalAnnals of Internal Medicine
Volume162
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 21 2015

Fingerprint

Iron-Deficiency Anemias
Advisory Committees
Iron
Mothers
Pregnancy
Gestational Age
Observational Studies
Pregnant Women
Apgar Score
Information Storage and Retrieval
Health Services Research
Premature Birth
Infant Mortality
Developed Countries
Premature Infants
MEDLINE
Libraries
Language
Odds Ratio
Quality of Life

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Routine iron supplementation and screening for iron deficiency anemia in pregnancy : A systematic review for the U.S. preventive services task force. / Cantor, Amy; Bougatsos, Christina; Dana, Tracy; Blazina, Ian; McDonagh, Marian.

In: Annals of Internal Medicine, Vol. 162, No. 8, 21.04.2015, p. 566-576.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{93438056354344ff9878d5f1ee9d7eb6,
title = "Routine iron supplementation and screening for iron deficiency anemia in pregnancy: A systematic review for the U.S. preventive services task force",
abstract = "Background: Routine screening and supplementation for iron deficiency anemia (IDA) in asymptomatic, nonanemic pregnant women could improve maternal and infant health outcomes. Purpose: Update of a 2006 systematic review by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force on screening and supplementation for IDA in pregnancy. Data Sources: MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library (1996 to August 2014) and reference lists of relevant systematic reviews to identify studies published since 1996. Study Selection: English-language trials and controlled observational studies about effectiveness of screening and routine supplementation for IDA in developed countries. Data Extraction: Data extraction and quality assessment confirmed and dual-rated by a second investigator using prespecified criteria. Data Synthesis: No study directly compared clinical outcomes or harms of screening or not screening pregnant women for IDA. Twelve supplementation trials were included, and no controlled observational studies met inclusion criteria. On the basis of 11 trials, routine maternal iron supplementation had inconsistent effects on rates of cesarean delivery, small size for gestational age, and low birthweight and no effect on maternal quality of life, gestational age, Apgar scores, preterm birth, or infant mortality. Twelve trials reported improvements in maternal hematologic indices, although not all were statistically significant. Pooled analysis of 4 trials resulted in a statistically significant difference in IDA incidence at term, favoring supplementation (risk ratio, 0.29 [95{\%} CI, 0.17 to 0.49]; I2 = 0{\%}). Maternal iron supplementation did not affect infant iron status at 6 months. Harms, none of which were serious or had long-term consequences, were inconsistently reported in 10 of the trials, with most finding no difference between groups. Limitations: Data from trials in countries with limited generalizability to U.S. populations were included. Studies were methodologically heterogeneous, and some were small and underpowered. Conclusion: There is inconclusive evidence that routine prenatal supplementation for IDA improves maternal or infant clinical health outcomes, but supplementation may improve maternal hematologic indices. Primary Funding Source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.",
author = "Amy Cantor and Christina Bougatsos and Tracy Dana and Ian Blazina and Marian McDonagh",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "21",
doi = "10.7326/M14-2932",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "162",
pages = "566--576",
journal = "Annals of Internal Medicine",
issn = "0003-4819",
publisher = "American College of Physicians",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Routine iron supplementation and screening for iron deficiency anemia in pregnancy

T2 - A systematic review for the U.S. preventive services task force

AU - Cantor, Amy

AU - Bougatsos, Christina

AU - Dana, Tracy

AU - Blazina, Ian

AU - McDonagh, Marian

PY - 2015/4/21

Y1 - 2015/4/21

N2 - Background: Routine screening and supplementation for iron deficiency anemia (IDA) in asymptomatic, nonanemic pregnant women could improve maternal and infant health outcomes. Purpose: Update of a 2006 systematic review by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force on screening and supplementation for IDA in pregnancy. Data Sources: MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library (1996 to August 2014) and reference lists of relevant systematic reviews to identify studies published since 1996. Study Selection: English-language trials and controlled observational studies about effectiveness of screening and routine supplementation for IDA in developed countries. Data Extraction: Data extraction and quality assessment confirmed and dual-rated by a second investigator using prespecified criteria. Data Synthesis: No study directly compared clinical outcomes or harms of screening or not screening pregnant women for IDA. Twelve supplementation trials were included, and no controlled observational studies met inclusion criteria. On the basis of 11 trials, routine maternal iron supplementation had inconsistent effects on rates of cesarean delivery, small size for gestational age, and low birthweight and no effect on maternal quality of life, gestational age, Apgar scores, preterm birth, or infant mortality. Twelve trials reported improvements in maternal hematologic indices, although not all were statistically significant. Pooled analysis of 4 trials resulted in a statistically significant difference in IDA incidence at term, favoring supplementation (risk ratio, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.17 to 0.49]; I2 = 0%). Maternal iron supplementation did not affect infant iron status at 6 months. Harms, none of which were serious or had long-term consequences, were inconsistently reported in 10 of the trials, with most finding no difference between groups. Limitations: Data from trials in countries with limited generalizability to U.S. populations were included. Studies were methodologically heterogeneous, and some were small and underpowered. Conclusion: There is inconclusive evidence that routine prenatal supplementation for IDA improves maternal or infant clinical health outcomes, but supplementation may improve maternal hematologic indices. Primary Funding Source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

AB - Background: Routine screening and supplementation for iron deficiency anemia (IDA) in asymptomatic, nonanemic pregnant women could improve maternal and infant health outcomes. Purpose: Update of a 2006 systematic review by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force on screening and supplementation for IDA in pregnancy. Data Sources: MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library (1996 to August 2014) and reference lists of relevant systematic reviews to identify studies published since 1996. Study Selection: English-language trials and controlled observational studies about effectiveness of screening and routine supplementation for IDA in developed countries. Data Extraction: Data extraction and quality assessment confirmed and dual-rated by a second investigator using prespecified criteria. Data Synthesis: No study directly compared clinical outcomes or harms of screening or not screening pregnant women for IDA. Twelve supplementation trials were included, and no controlled observational studies met inclusion criteria. On the basis of 11 trials, routine maternal iron supplementation had inconsistent effects on rates of cesarean delivery, small size for gestational age, and low birthweight and no effect on maternal quality of life, gestational age, Apgar scores, preterm birth, or infant mortality. Twelve trials reported improvements in maternal hematologic indices, although not all were statistically significant. Pooled analysis of 4 trials resulted in a statistically significant difference in IDA incidence at term, favoring supplementation (risk ratio, 0.29 [95% CI, 0.17 to 0.49]; I2 = 0%). Maternal iron supplementation did not affect infant iron status at 6 months. Harms, none of which were serious or had long-term consequences, were inconsistently reported in 10 of the trials, with most finding no difference between groups. Limitations: Data from trials in countries with limited generalizability to U.S. populations were included. Studies were methodologically heterogeneous, and some were small and underpowered. Conclusion: There is inconclusive evidence that routine prenatal supplementation for IDA improves maternal or infant clinical health outcomes, but supplementation may improve maternal hematologic indices. Primary Funding Source: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928155737&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928155737&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.7326/M14-2932

DO - 10.7326/M14-2932

M3 - Article

C2 - 25820661

AN - SCOPUS:84928155737

VL - 162

SP - 566

EP - 576

JO - Annals of Internal Medicine

JF - Annals of Internal Medicine

SN - 0003-4819

IS - 8

ER -