Robotic objective structured assessment of technical skills

A randomized multicenter dry laboratory training pilot study

Megan Elizabeth Tarr, Colleen Rivard, Amy E. Petzel, Sondra Summers, Elizabeth R. Mueller, Leslie M. Rickey, Mary Denman, Regina Harders, Ramon Durazo-Arvizu, Kimberly Kenton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Study Objective: The goal of this study was to determine if a robotic dry laboratory curriculum for gynecology and urology residents improved their basic robotic skills. Methods: After the institution-specific institutional review board approval or exemption, 165 residents from 8 gynecology and/or urology programs were enrolled. Residents underwent standardized robotic orientation followed by dry laboratory testing on 4 unique robotic tasks. Residents were block randomized by program to unstructured or structured training programs. Regardless of group, residentswere expected to practice for 15 minutes twice monthly over 7 months. Errors, time to completion, and objective structured assessment of technical skills global rating scores were recorded for each task before and after the training period. Statistics were calculated using the Student t tests, Pearson correlation, and analysis of variance with STATA systems (version 11.2). Results: A total of 99 residents completed both the pretraining and posttraining testing. A mean of 4 (range, 0-15) 15-minute training sessions per resident was self-reported. The structured group had faster posttraining times on the transection task, although the unstructured group had higher posttraining scores on the knot-tying task. Conclusions: Overall, the residents' robotic skills improved after participating in a dry laboratory curriculum; however, robotic availability, duty hour restrictions, and clinical responsibilities limit the curriculum implementation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)228-236
Number of pages9
JournalFemale Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery
Volume20
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 2014

Fingerprint

Robotics
Curriculum
Urology
Gynecology
Research Ethics Committees
Analysis of Variance
Students
Education

Keywords

  • OSATS
  • Resident education
  • Robotic surgery
  • Teaching curriculum

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Surgery
  • Urology
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Robotic objective structured assessment of technical skills : A randomized multicenter dry laboratory training pilot study. / Tarr, Megan Elizabeth; Rivard, Colleen; Petzel, Amy E.; Summers, Sondra; Mueller, Elizabeth R.; Rickey, Leslie M.; Denman, Mary; Harders, Regina; Durazo-Arvizu, Ramon; Kenton, Kimberly.

In: Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, Vol. 20, No. 4, 2014, p. 228-236.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Tarr, ME, Rivard, C, Petzel, AE, Summers, S, Mueller, ER, Rickey, LM, Denman, M, Harders, R, Durazo-Arvizu, R & Kenton, K 2014, 'Robotic objective structured assessment of technical skills: A randomized multicenter dry laboratory training pilot study', Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 228-236. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000067
Tarr, Megan Elizabeth ; Rivard, Colleen ; Petzel, Amy E. ; Summers, Sondra ; Mueller, Elizabeth R. ; Rickey, Leslie M. ; Denman, Mary ; Harders, Regina ; Durazo-Arvizu, Ramon ; Kenton, Kimberly. / Robotic objective structured assessment of technical skills : A randomized multicenter dry laboratory training pilot study. In: Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery. 2014 ; Vol. 20, No. 4. pp. 228-236.
@article{34191f73c2ec4d5c9ec34c4035acba36,
title = "Robotic objective structured assessment of technical skills: A randomized multicenter dry laboratory training pilot study",
abstract = "Study Objective: The goal of this study was to determine if a robotic dry laboratory curriculum for gynecology and urology residents improved their basic robotic skills. Methods: After the institution-specific institutional review board approval or exemption, 165 residents from 8 gynecology and/or urology programs were enrolled. Residents underwent standardized robotic orientation followed by dry laboratory testing on 4 unique robotic tasks. Residents were block randomized by program to unstructured or structured training programs. Regardless of group, residentswere expected to practice for 15 minutes twice monthly over 7 months. Errors, time to completion, and objective structured assessment of technical skills global rating scores were recorded for each task before and after the training period. Statistics were calculated using the Student t tests, Pearson correlation, and analysis of variance with STATA systems (version 11.2). Results: A total of 99 residents completed both the pretraining and posttraining testing. A mean of 4 (range, 0-15) 15-minute training sessions per resident was self-reported. The structured group had faster posttraining times on the transection task, although the unstructured group had higher posttraining scores on the knot-tying task. Conclusions: Overall, the residents' robotic skills improved after participating in a dry laboratory curriculum; however, robotic availability, duty hour restrictions, and clinical responsibilities limit the curriculum implementation.",
keywords = "OSATS, Resident education, Robotic surgery, Teaching curriculum",
author = "Tarr, {Megan Elizabeth} and Colleen Rivard and Petzel, {Amy E.} and Sondra Summers and Mueller, {Elizabeth R.} and Rickey, {Leslie M.} and Mary Denman and Regina Harders and Ramon Durazo-Arvizu and Kimberly Kenton",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1097/SPV.0000000000000067",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "20",
pages = "228--236",
journal = "Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery",
issn = "2151-8378",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Robotic objective structured assessment of technical skills

T2 - A randomized multicenter dry laboratory training pilot study

AU - Tarr, Megan Elizabeth

AU - Rivard, Colleen

AU - Petzel, Amy E.

AU - Summers, Sondra

AU - Mueller, Elizabeth R.

AU - Rickey, Leslie M.

AU - Denman, Mary

AU - Harders, Regina

AU - Durazo-Arvizu, Ramon

AU - Kenton, Kimberly

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - Study Objective: The goal of this study was to determine if a robotic dry laboratory curriculum for gynecology and urology residents improved their basic robotic skills. Methods: After the institution-specific institutional review board approval or exemption, 165 residents from 8 gynecology and/or urology programs were enrolled. Residents underwent standardized robotic orientation followed by dry laboratory testing on 4 unique robotic tasks. Residents were block randomized by program to unstructured or structured training programs. Regardless of group, residentswere expected to practice for 15 minutes twice monthly over 7 months. Errors, time to completion, and objective structured assessment of technical skills global rating scores were recorded for each task before and after the training period. Statistics were calculated using the Student t tests, Pearson correlation, and analysis of variance with STATA systems (version 11.2). Results: A total of 99 residents completed both the pretraining and posttraining testing. A mean of 4 (range, 0-15) 15-minute training sessions per resident was self-reported. The structured group had faster posttraining times on the transection task, although the unstructured group had higher posttraining scores on the knot-tying task. Conclusions: Overall, the residents' robotic skills improved after participating in a dry laboratory curriculum; however, robotic availability, duty hour restrictions, and clinical responsibilities limit the curriculum implementation.

AB - Study Objective: The goal of this study was to determine if a robotic dry laboratory curriculum for gynecology and urology residents improved their basic robotic skills. Methods: After the institution-specific institutional review board approval or exemption, 165 residents from 8 gynecology and/or urology programs were enrolled. Residents underwent standardized robotic orientation followed by dry laboratory testing on 4 unique robotic tasks. Residents were block randomized by program to unstructured or structured training programs. Regardless of group, residentswere expected to practice for 15 minutes twice monthly over 7 months. Errors, time to completion, and objective structured assessment of technical skills global rating scores were recorded for each task before and after the training period. Statistics were calculated using the Student t tests, Pearson correlation, and analysis of variance with STATA systems (version 11.2). Results: A total of 99 residents completed both the pretraining and posttraining testing. A mean of 4 (range, 0-15) 15-minute training sessions per resident was self-reported. The structured group had faster posttraining times on the transection task, although the unstructured group had higher posttraining scores on the knot-tying task. Conclusions: Overall, the residents' robotic skills improved after participating in a dry laboratory curriculum; however, robotic availability, duty hour restrictions, and clinical responsibilities limit the curriculum implementation.

KW - OSATS

KW - Resident education

KW - Robotic surgery

KW - Teaching curriculum

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84905825588&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84905825588&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000067

DO - 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000067

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 228

EP - 236

JO - Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery

JF - Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery

SN - 2151-8378

IS - 4

ER -