Risk prediction models for hospital readmission: A systematic review

Devan Kansagara, Honora Englander, Amanda Salanitro, David Kagen, Cecelia Theobald, Michele Freeman, Sunil Kripalani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

936 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context: Predicting hospital readmission risk is of great interest to identify which patients would benefit most from care transition interventions, as well as to risk-adjust readmission rates for the purposes of hospital comparison. Objective: To summarize validated readmission risk prediction models, describe their performance, and assess suitability for clinical or administrative use. Data Sources and Study Selection: The databases of MEDLINE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception through March 2011, the EMBASE database was searched through August 2011, and hand searches were performed of the retrieved reference lists. Dual review was conducted to identify studies published in the English language of prediction models tested with medical patients in both derivation and validation cohorts. Data Extraction: Data were extracted on the population, setting, sample size, follow-up interval, readmission rate, model discrimination and calibration, type of data used, and timing of data collection. Data Synthesis: Of 7843 citations reviewed, 30 studies of 26 unique models met the inclusion criteria. The most common outcome used was 30-day readmission; only 1 model specifically addressed preventable readmissions. Fourteen models that relied on retrospective administrative data could be potentially used to risk-adjust readmission rates for hospital comparison; of these, 9 were tested in large US populations and had poor discriminative ability (c statistic range: 0.55-0.65). Seven models could potentially be used to identify high-risk patients for intervention early during a hospitalization (c statistic range: 0.56-0.72), and 5 could be used at hospital discharge (c statistic range: 0.68-0.83). Six studies compared different models in the same population and 2 of these found that functional and social variables improved model discrimination. Although most models incorporated variables for medical comorbidity and use of prior medical services, few examined variables associated with overall health and function, illness severity, or social determinants of health. Conclusions: Most current readmission risk prediction models that were designed for either comparative or clinical purposes perform poorly. Although in certain settings such models may prove useful, efforts to improve their performance are needed as use becomes more widespread.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1688-1698
Number of pages11
JournalJAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association
Volume306
Issue number15
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 19 2011

Fingerprint

Patient Readmission
Databases
Social Determinants of Health
Population
Patient Transfer
Aptitude
Information Storage and Retrieval
MEDLINE
Sample Size
Calibration
Libraries
Comorbidity
Hospitalization
Language
Health

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Kansagara, D., Englander, H., Salanitro, A., Kagen, D., Theobald, C., Freeman, M., & Kripalani, S. (2011). Risk prediction models for hospital readmission: A systematic review. JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association, 306(15), 1688-1698. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.1515

Risk prediction models for hospital readmission : A systematic review. / Kansagara, Devan; Englander, Honora; Salanitro, Amanda; Kagen, David; Theobald, Cecelia; Freeman, Michele; Kripalani, Sunil.

In: JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 306, No. 15, 19.10.2011, p. 1688-1698.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Kansagara, D, Englander, H, Salanitro, A, Kagen, D, Theobald, C, Freeman, M & Kripalani, S 2011, 'Risk prediction models for hospital readmission: A systematic review', JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 306, no. 15, pp. 1688-1698. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2011.1515
Kansagara, Devan ; Englander, Honora ; Salanitro, Amanda ; Kagen, David ; Theobald, Cecelia ; Freeman, Michele ; Kripalani, Sunil. / Risk prediction models for hospital readmission : A systematic review. In: JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association. 2011 ; Vol. 306, No. 15. pp. 1688-1698.
@article{149b9a63b78a452897dcd6bfc7b1a744,
title = "Risk prediction models for hospital readmission: A systematic review",
abstract = "Context: Predicting hospital readmission risk is of great interest to identify which patients would benefit most from care transition interventions, as well as to risk-adjust readmission rates for the purposes of hospital comparison. Objective: To summarize validated readmission risk prediction models, describe their performance, and assess suitability for clinical or administrative use. Data Sources and Study Selection: The databases of MEDLINE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception through March 2011, the EMBASE database was searched through August 2011, and hand searches were performed of the retrieved reference lists. Dual review was conducted to identify studies published in the English language of prediction models tested with medical patients in both derivation and validation cohorts. Data Extraction: Data were extracted on the population, setting, sample size, follow-up interval, readmission rate, model discrimination and calibration, type of data used, and timing of data collection. Data Synthesis: Of 7843 citations reviewed, 30 studies of 26 unique models met the inclusion criteria. The most common outcome used was 30-day readmission; only 1 model specifically addressed preventable readmissions. Fourteen models that relied on retrospective administrative data could be potentially used to risk-adjust readmission rates for hospital comparison; of these, 9 were tested in large US populations and had poor discriminative ability (c statistic range: 0.55-0.65). Seven models could potentially be used to identify high-risk patients for intervention early during a hospitalization (c statistic range: 0.56-0.72), and 5 could be used at hospital discharge (c statistic range: 0.68-0.83). Six studies compared different models in the same population and 2 of these found that functional and social variables improved model discrimination. Although most models incorporated variables for medical comorbidity and use of prior medical services, few examined variables associated with overall health and function, illness severity, or social determinants of health. Conclusions: Most current readmission risk prediction models that were designed for either comparative or clinical purposes perform poorly. Although in certain settings such models may prove useful, efforts to improve their performance are needed as use becomes more widespread.",
author = "Devan Kansagara and Honora Englander and Amanda Salanitro and David Kagen and Cecelia Theobald and Michele Freeman and Sunil Kripalani",
year = "2011",
month = "10",
day = "19",
doi = "10.1001/jama.2011.1515",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "306",
pages = "1688--1698",
journal = "JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association",
issn = "0002-9955",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "15",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risk prediction models for hospital readmission

T2 - A systematic review

AU - Kansagara, Devan

AU - Englander, Honora

AU - Salanitro, Amanda

AU - Kagen, David

AU - Theobald, Cecelia

AU - Freeman, Michele

AU - Kripalani, Sunil

PY - 2011/10/19

Y1 - 2011/10/19

N2 - Context: Predicting hospital readmission risk is of great interest to identify which patients would benefit most from care transition interventions, as well as to risk-adjust readmission rates for the purposes of hospital comparison. Objective: To summarize validated readmission risk prediction models, describe their performance, and assess suitability for clinical or administrative use. Data Sources and Study Selection: The databases of MEDLINE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception through March 2011, the EMBASE database was searched through August 2011, and hand searches were performed of the retrieved reference lists. Dual review was conducted to identify studies published in the English language of prediction models tested with medical patients in both derivation and validation cohorts. Data Extraction: Data were extracted on the population, setting, sample size, follow-up interval, readmission rate, model discrimination and calibration, type of data used, and timing of data collection. Data Synthesis: Of 7843 citations reviewed, 30 studies of 26 unique models met the inclusion criteria. The most common outcome used was 30-day readmission; only 1 model specifically addressed preventable readmissions. Fourteen models that relied on retrospective administrative data could be potentially used to risk-adjust readmission rates for hospital comparison; of these, 9 were tested in large US populations and had poor discriminative ability (c statistic range: 0.55-0.65). Seven models could potentially be used to identify high-risk patients for intervention early during a hospitalization (c statistic range: 0.56-0.72), and 5 could be used at hospital discharge (c statistic range: 0.68-0.83). Six studies compared different models in the same population and 2 of these found that functional and social variables improved model discrimination. Although most models incorporated variables for medical comorbidity and use of prior medical services, few examined variables associated with overall health and function, illness severity, or social determinants of health. Conclusions: Most current readmission risk prediction models that were designed for either comparative or clinical purposes perform poorly. Although in certain settings such models may prove useful, efforts to improve their performance are needed as use becomes more widespread.

AB - Context: Predicting hospital readmission risk is of great interest to identify which patients would benefit most from care transition interventions, as well as to risk-adjust readmission rates for the purposes of hospital comparison. Objective: To summarize validated readmission risk prediction models, describe their performance, and assess suitability for clinical or administrative use. Data Sources and Study Selection: The databases of MEDLINE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception through March 2011, the EMBASE database was searched through August 2011, and hand searches were performed of the retrieved reference lists. Dual review was conducted to identify studies published in the English language of prediction models tested with medical patients in both derivation and validation cohorts. Data Extraction: Data were extracted on the population, setting, sample size, follow-up interval, readmission rate, model discrimination and calibration, type of data used, and timing of data collection. Data Synthesis: Of 7843 citations reviewed, 30 studies of 26 unique models met the inclusion criteria. The most common outcome used was 30-day readmission; only 1 model specifically addressed preventable readmissions. Fourteen models that relied on retrospective administrative data could be potentially used to risk-adjust readmission rates for hospital comparison; of these, 9 were tested in large US populations and had poor discriminative ability (c statistic range: 0.55-0.65). Seven models could potentially be used to identify high-risk patients for intervention early during a hospitalization (c statistic range: 0.56-0.72), and 5 could be used at hospital discharge (c statistic range: 0.68-0.83). Six studies compared different models in the same population and 2 of these found that functional and social variables improved model discrimination. Although most models incorporated variables for medical comorbidity and use of prior medical services, few examined variables associated with overall health and function, illness severity, or social determinants of health. Conclusions: Most current readmission risk prediction models that were designed for either comparative or clinical purposes perform poorly. Although in certain settings such models may prove useful, efforts to improve their performance are needed as use becomes more widespread.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80054764509&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80054764509&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/jama.2011.1515

DO - 10.1001/jama.2011.1515

M3 - Article

C2 - 22009101

AN - SCOPUS:80054764509

VL - 306

SP - 1688

EP - 1698

JO - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

JF - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

SN - 0002-9955

IS - 15

ER -