Risk of intrapartum cervical lacerations in women with cerclage

Viola Seravalli, Sushma Potti, Vincenzo Berghella

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The aim of our study was to estimate whether the placement of cerclage in pregnancy to prevent preterm birth (PTB) is associated with higher incidence of intrapartum cervical lacerations. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on singleton pregnancies with risk factors for PTB. The study group consisted of women with either a history- or ultrasound-indicated cerclage placed between 12 and 24 weeks of gestation, while the control group consisted of women with similar risk factors for PTB but who did not receive a cerclage. Primary outcome was the incidence of intrapartum cervical lacerations. A sample size calculation was performed on the basis of the results of previous studies on cervical lacerations. Results: We identified 134 women who had a cerclage placed in pregnancy. They were compared with 236 controls with no cerclage. Cases and controls had similar risk factors for cervical lacerations. Cervical lacerations occurred with similar frequencies in the cerclage and no-cerclage group (2.2 vs 1.3%, p = 0.78). There was no significant difference between the two groups for the risk of cervical lacerations (RR 1.76, 95% CI: 0.36-8.60). Conclusions: Cerclage placement during pregnancy is not associated with an increased risk of intrapartum cervical lacerations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)294-298
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine
Volume26
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2013
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Lacerations
Premature Birth
Pregnancy
Incidence
Sample Size
Cohort Studies
Retrospective Studies
History
Control Groups

Keywords

  • Cerclage
  • Cervical lacerations
  • Preterm birth

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Cite this

Risk of intrapartum cervical lacerations in women with cerclage. / Seravalli, Viola; Potti, Sushma; Berghella, Vincenzo.

In: Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, Vol. 26, No. 3, 02.2013, p. 294-298.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Seravalli, Viola ; Potti, Sushma ; Berghella, Vincenzo. / Risk of intrapartum cervical lacerations in women with cerclage. In: Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine. 2013 ; Vol. 26, No. 3. pp. 294-298.
@article{89058b6b87ec4ab0b4a95bbd33fb0318,
title = "Risk of intrapartum cervical lacerations in women with cerclage",
abstract = "Objective: The aim of our study was to estimate whether the placement of cerclage in pregnancy to prevent preterm birth (PTB) is associated with higher incidence of intrapartum cervical lacerations. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on singleton pregnancies with risk factors for PTB. The study group consisted of women with either a history- or ultrasound-indicated cerclage placed between 12 and 24 weeks of gestation, while the control group consisted of women with similar risk factors for PTB but who did not receive a cerclage. Primary outcome was the incidence of intrapartum cervical lacerations. A sample size calculation was performed on the basis of the results of previous studies on cervical lacerations. Results: We identified 134 women who had a cerclage placed in pregnancy. They were compared with 236 controls with no cerclage. Cases and controls had similar risk factors for cervical lacerations. Cervical lacerations occurred with similar frequencies in the cerclage and no-cerclage group (2.2 vs 1.3{\%}, p = 0.78). There was no significant difference between the two groups for the risk of cervical lacerations (RR 1.76, 95{\%} CI: 0.36-8.60). Conclusions: Cerclage placement during pregnancy is not associated with an increased risk of intrapartum cervical lacerations.",
keywords = "Cerclage, Cervical lacerations, Preterm birth",
author = "Viola Seravalli and Sushma Potti and Vincenzo Berghella",
year = "2013",
month = "2",
doi = "10.3109/14767058.2012.733755",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "294--298",
journal = "Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine",
issn = "1476-7058",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Risk of intrapartum cervical lacerations in women with cerclage

AU - Seravalli, Viola

AU - Potti, Sushma

AU - Berghella, Vincenzo

PY - 2013/2

Y1 - 2013/2

N2 - Objective: The aim of our study was to estimate whether the placement of cerclage in pregnancy to prevent preterm birth (PTB) is associated with higher incidence of intrapartum cervical lacerations. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on singleton pregnancies with risk factors for PTB. The study group consisted of women with either a history- or ultrasound-indicated cerclage placed between 12 and 24 weeks of gestation, while the control group consisted of women with similar risk factors for PTB but who did not receive a cerclage. Primary outcome was the incidence of intrapartum cervical lacerations. A sample size calculation was performed on the basis of the results of previous studies on cervical lacerations. Results: We identified 134 women who had a cerclage placed in pregnancy. They were compared with 236 controls with no cerclage. Cases and controls had similar risk factors for cervical lacerations. Cervical lacerations occurred with similar frequencies in the cerclage and no-cerclage group (2.2 vs 1.3%, p = 0.78). There was no significant difference between the two groups for the risk of cervical lacerations (RR 1.76, 95% CI: 0.36-8.60). Conclusions: Cerclage placement during pregnancy is not associated with an increased risk of intrapartum cervical lacerations.

AB - Objective: The aim of our study was to estimate whether the placement of cerclage in pregnancy to prevent preterm birth (PTB) is associated with higher incidence of intrapartum cervical lacerations. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on singleton pregnancies with risk factors for PTB. The study group consisted of women with either a history- or ultrasound-indicated cerclage placed between 12 and 24 weeks of gestation, while the control group consisted of women with similar risk factors for PTB but who did not receive a cerclage. Primary outcome was the incidence of intrapartum cervical lacerations. A sample size calculation was performed on the basis of the results of previous studies on cervical lacerations. Results: We identified 134 women who had a cerclage placed in pregnancy. They were compared with 236 controls with no cerclage. Cases and controls had similar risk factors for cervical lacerations. Cervical lacerations occurred with similar frequencies in the cerclage and no-cerclage group (2.2 vs 1.3%, p = 0.78). There was no significant difference between the two groups for the risk of cervical lacerations (RR 1.76, 95% CI: 0.36-8.60). Conclusions: Cerclage placement during pregnancy is not associated with an increased risk of intrapartum cervical lacerations.

KW - Cerclage

KW - Cervical lacerations

KW - Preterm birth

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84872347574&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84872347574&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/14767058.2012.733755

DO - 10.3109/14767058.2012.733755

M3 - Article

C2 - 23025658

AN - SCOPUS:84872347574

VL - 26

SP - 294

EP - 298

JO - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

JF - Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine

SN - 1476-7058

IS - 3

ER -