RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, Isopulegol, CAS Registry Number 89-79-2

A. M. Api, D. Belsito, S. Bhatia, M. Bruze, P. Calow, M. L. Dagli, W. Dekant, Allison Fryer, L. Kromidas, S. La Cava, J. F. Lalko, A. Lapczynski, D. C. Liebler, T. M. Penning, V. T. Politano, G. Ritacco, D. Salvito, T. W. Schultz, J. Shen, I. G. SipesB. Wall, D. K. Wilcox

Research output: Contribution to journalShort survey

Abstract

This material was evaluated for genotoxicity, repeated dose toxicity, developmental and reproductive toxicity, local respiratory toxicity, phototoxicity/photoallergenicity, skin sensitization, as well as environmental safety. Data show that this material is not genotoxic nor does it have skin sensitization potential. The repeated dose, developmental and reproductive, and local respiratory toxicity endpoints were completed using the TTC (Threshold of Toxicological Concern) for a Cramer Class I material (0.03, 0.03 mg/kg/day and 1.4 mg/day, respectively). The phototoxicity/photoallergenicity endpoint was completed based on suitable UV spectra. The environmental endpoint was completed as described in the RIFM Framework.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)S129-S135
JournalFood and Chemical Toxicology
Volume97
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2016

Fingerprint

Phototoxic Dermatitis
Fragrances
safety assessment
endpoints
phototoxicity
Toxicity
Registries
ingredients
odors
toxicity
Safety
Skin
Toxicology
reproductive toxicology
developmental toxicity
genotoxicity
dosage
isopulegol

Keywords

  • Developmental and reproductive toxicity
  • Environmental safety
  • Genotoxicity
  • Local respiratory toxicity
  • Phototoxicity/photoallergenicity
  • Repeated dose
  • Skin sensitization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Food Science
  • Toxicology

Cite this

Api, A. M., Belsito, D., Bhatia, S., Bruze, M., Calow, P., Dagli, M. L., ... Wilcox, D. K. (2016). RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, Isopulegol, CAS Registry Number 89-79-2. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 97, S129-S135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2016.08.001

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, Isopulegol, CAS Registry Number 89-79-2. / Api, A. M.; Belsito, D.; Bhatia, S.; Bruze, M.; Calow, P.; Dagli, M. L.; Dekant, W.; Fryer, Allison; Kromidas, L.; La Cava, S.; Lalko, J. F.; Lapczynski, A.; Liebler, D. C.; Penning, T. M.; Politano, V. T.; Ritacco, G.; Salvito, D.; Schultz, T. W.; Shen, J.; Sipes, I. G.; Wall, B.; Wilcox, D. K.

In: Food and Chemical Toxicology, Vol. 97, 01.11.2016, p. S129-S135.

Research output: Contribution to journalShort survey

Api, AM, Belsito, D, Bhatia, S, Bruze, M, Calow, P, Dagli, ML, Dekant, W, Fryer, A, Kromidas, L, La Cava, S, Lalko, JF, Lapczynski, A, Liebler, DC, Penning, TM, Politano, VT, Ritacco, G, Salvito, D, Schultz, TW, Shen, J, Sipes, IG, Wall, B & Wilcox, DK 2016, 'RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, Isopulegol, CAS Registry Number 89-79-2', Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 97, pp. S129-S135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2016.08.001
Api, A. M. ; Belsito, D. ; Bhatia, S. ; Bruze, M. ; Calow, P. ; Dagli, M. L. ; Dekant, W. ; Fryer, Allison ; Kromidas, L. ; La Cava, S. ; Lalko, J. F. ; Lapczynski, A. ; Liebler, D. C. ; Penning, T. M. ; Politano, V. T. ; Ritacco, G. ; Salvito, D. ; Schultz, T. W. ; Shen, J. ; Sipes, I. G. ; Wall, B. ; Wilcox, D. K. / RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, Isopulegol, CAS Registry Number 89-79-2. In: Food and Chemical Toxicology. 2016 ; Vol. 97. pp. S129-S135.
@article{8d4e5129557f47ed84bf5ef7e4e7a278,
title = "RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, Isopulegol, CAS Registry Number 89-79-2",
abstract = "This material was evaluated for genotoxicity, repeated dose toxicity, developmental and reproductive toxicity, local respiratory toxicity, phototoxicity/photoallergenicity, skin sensitization, as well as environmental safety. Data show that this material is not genotoxic nor does it have skin sensitization potential. The repeated dose, developmental and reproductive, and local respiratory toxicity endpoints were completed using the TTC (Threshold of Toxicological Concern) for a Cramer Class I material (0.03, 0.03 mg/kg/day and 1.4 mg/day, respectively). The phototoxicity/photoallergenicity endpoint was completed based on suitable UV spectra. The environmental endpoint was completed as described in the RIFM Framework.",
keywords = "Developmental and reproductive toxicity, Environmental safety, Genotoxicity, Local respiratory toxicity, Phototoxicity/photoallergenicity, Repeated dose, Skin sensitization",
author = "Api, {A. M.} and D. Belsito and S. Bhatia and M. Bruze and P. Calow and Dagli, {M. L.} and W. Dekant and Allison Fryer and L. Kromidas and {La Cava}, S. and Lalko, {J. F.} and A. Lapczynski and Liebler, {D. C.} and Penning, {T. M.} and Politano, {V. T.} and G. Ritacco and D. Salvito and Schultz, {T. W.} and J. Shen and Sipes, {I. G.} and B. Wall and Wilcox, {D. K.}",
year = "2016",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.fct.2016.08.001",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "97",
pages = "S129--S135",
journal = "Food and Chemical Toxicology",
issn = "0278-6915",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, Isopulegol, CAS Registry Number 89-79-2

AU - Api, A. M.

AU - Belsito, D.

AU - Bhatia, S.

AU - Bruze, M.

AU - Calow, P.

AU - Dagli, M. L.

AU - Dekant, W.

AU - Fryer, Allison

AU - Kromidas, L.

AU - La Cava, S.

AU - Lalko, J. F.

AU - Lapczynski, A.

AU - Liebler, D. C.

AU - Penning, T. M.

AU - Politano, V. T.

AU - Ritacco, G.

AU - Salvito, D.

AU - Schultz, T. W.

AU - Shen, J.

AU - Sipes, I. G.

AU - Wall, B.

AU - Wilcox, D. K.

PY - 2016/11/1

Y1 - 2016/11/1

N2 - This material was evaluated for genotoxicity, repeated dose toxicity, developmental and reproductive toxicity, local respiratory toxicity, phototoxicity/photoallergenicity, skin sensitization, as well as environmental safety. Data show that this material is not genotoxic nor does it have skin sensitization potential. The repeated dose, developmental and reproductive, and local respiratory toxicity endpoints were completed using the TTC (Threshold of Toxicological Concern) for a Cramer Class I material (0.03, 0.03 mg/kg/day and 1.4 mg/day, respectively). The phototoxicity/photoallergenicity endpoint was completed based on suitable UV spectra. The environmental endpoint was completed as described in the RIFM Framework.

AB - This material was evaluated for genotoxicity, repeated dose toxicity, developmental and reproductive toxicity, local respiratory toxicity, phototoxicity/photoallergenicity, skin sensitization, as well as environmental safety. Data show that this material is not genotoxic nor does it have skin sensitization potential. The repeated dose, developmental and reproductive, and local respiratory toxicity endpoints were completed using the TTC (Threshold of Toxicological Concern) for a Cramer Class I material (0.03, 0.03 mg/kg/day and 1.4 mg/day, respectively). The phototoxicity/photoallergenicity endpoint was completed based on suitable UV spectra. The environmental endpoint was completed as described in the RIFM Framework.

KW - Developmental and reproductive toxicity

KW - Environmental safety

KW - Genotoxicity

KW - Local respiratory toxicity

KW - Phototoxicity/photoallergenicity

KW - Repeated dose

KW - Skin sensitization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84994201675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84994201675&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.fct.2016.08.001

DO - 10.1016/j.fct.2016.08.001

M3 - Short survey

C2 - 27495825

AN - SCOPUS:84994201675

VL - 97

SP - S129-S135

JO - Food and Chemical Toxicology

JF - Food and Chemical Toxicology

SN - 0278-6915

ER -