RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, cyclohexanol, CAS Registry Number 108-93-0

A. M. Api; D. Belsito; S. Biserta; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; G. A. Burton; J. Buschmann; M. A. Cancellieri; M. L. Dagli; M. Date; W. Dekant; C. Deodhar; A. D. Fryer; S. Gadhia; L. Jones; K. Joshi; M. Kumar; A. Lapczynski; M. Lavelle; I. Lee; D. C. Liebler; H. Moustakas; M. Na; T. M. Penning; G. Ritacco; J. Romine; N. Sadekar; T. W. Schultz; D. Selechnik; F. Siddiqi; I. G. Sipes; G. Sullivan; Y. Thakkar; Y. Tokura

doi:10.1016/j.fct.2021.112047

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, cyclohexanol, CAS Registry Number 108-93-0

A. M. Api, D. Belsito, S. Biserta, D. Botelho, M. Bruze, G. A. Burton, J. Buschmann, M. A. Cancellieri, M. L. Dagli, M. Date, W. Dekant, C. Deodhar, A. D. Fryer, S. Gadhia, L. Jones, K. Joshi, M. Kumar, A. Lapczynski, M. Lavelle, I. LeeD. C. Liebler, H. Moustakas, M. Na, T. M. Penning, G. Ritacco, J. Romine, N. Sadekar, T. W. Schultz, D. Selechnik, F. Siddiqi, I. G. Sipes, G. Sullivan, Y. Thakkar, Y. Tokura

Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Short survey › peer-review

Abstract

The existing information supports the use of this material as described in this safety assessment. Cyclohexanol was evaluated for genotoxicity, repeated dose toxicity, reproductive toxicity, local respiratory toxicity, phototoxicity/photoallergenicity, skin sensitization, and environmental safety. Data show that cyclohexanol is not genotoxic. Data on cyclohexanol provide a calculated margin of exposure (MOE) >100 for the repeated dose toxicity and reproductive toxicity endpoints. Data show that there are no safety concerns for cyclohexanol for skin sensitization under the current declared levels of use. The phototoxicity/photoallergenicity endpoints were evaluated based on ultraviolet (UV) spectra; cyclohexanol is not expected to be phototoxic/photoallergenic. The local respiratory toxicity endpoint was evaluated using the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) for a Cramer Class I material, and the exposure to cyclohexanol is below the TTC (1.4 mg/day). The environmental endpoints were evaluated; cyclohexanol was found not to be persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic (PBT) as per the International Fragrance Association (IFRA) Environmental Standards, and its risk quotients, based on its current volume of use in Europe and North America (i.e., Predicted Environmental Concentration/Predicted No Effect Concentration [PEC/PNEC]), are <1.

Original language	English (US)
Article number	112047
Journal	Food and Chemical Toxicology
Volume	149
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2021.112047
State	Published - Mar 2021

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Food Science
Toxicology

Access to Document

10.1016/j.fct.2021.112047

Cite this

Api, A. M., Belsito, D., Biserta, S., Botelho, D., Bruze, M., Burton, G. A., Buschmann, J., Cancellieri, M. A., Dagli, M. L., Date, M., Dekant, W., Deodhar, C., Fryer, A. D., Gadhia, S., Jones, L., Joshi, K., Kumar, M., Lapczynski, A., Lavelle, M., ... Tokura, Y. (2021). RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, cyclohexanol, CAS Registry Number 108-93-0. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 149, Article 112047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2021.112047

Api, AM, Belsito, D, Biserta, S, Botelho, D, Bruze, M, Burton, GA, Buschmann, J, Cancellieri, MA, Dagli, ML, Date, M, Dekant, W, Deodhar, C, Fryer, AD, Gadhia, S, Jones, L, Joshi, K, Kumar, M, Lapczynski, A, Lavelle, M, Lee, I, Liebler, DC, Moustakas, H, Na, M, Penning, TM, Ritacco, G, Romine, J, Sadekar, N, Schultz, TW, Selechnik, D, Siddiqi, F, Sipes, IG, Sullivan, G, Thakkar, Y & Tokura, Y 2021, 'RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, cyclohexanol, CAS Registry Number 108-93-0', Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 149, 112047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2021.112047

@article{ed26a35b7d844dbe9aae13394a571581,

title = "RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, cyclohexanol, CAS Registry Number 108-93-0",

abstract = "The existing information supports the use of this material as described in this safety assessment. Cyclohexanol was evaluated for genotoxicity, repeated dose toxicity, reproductive toxicity, local respiratory toxicity, phototoxicity/photoallergenicity, skin sensitization, and environmental safety. Data show that cyclohexanol is not genotoxic. Data on cyclohexanol provide a calculated margin of exposure (MOE) >100 for the repeated dose toxicity and reproductive toxicity endpoints. Data show that there are no safety concerns for cyclohexanol for skin sensitization under the current declared levels of use. The phototoxicity/photoallergenicity endpoints were evaluated based on ultraviolet (UV) spectra; cyclohexanol is not expected to be phototoxic/photoallergenic. The local respiratory toxicity endpoint was evaluated using the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) for a Cramer Class I material, and the exposure to cyclohexanol is below the TTC (1.4 mg/day). The environmental endpoints were evaluated; cyclohexanol was found not to be persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic (PBT) as per the International Fragrance Association (IFRA) Environmental Standards, and its risk quotients, based on its current volume of use in Europe and North America (i.e., Predicted Environmental Concentration/Predicted No Effect Concentration [PEC/PNEC]), are <1.",

author = "Api, {A. M.} and D. Belsito and S. Biserta and D. Botelho and M. Bruze and Burton, {G. A.} and J. Buschmann and Cancellieri, {M. A.} and Dagli, {M. L.} and M. Date and W. Dekant and C. Deodhar and Fryer, {A. D.} and S. Gadhia and L. Jones and K. Joshi and M. Kumar and A. Lapczynski and M. Lavelle and I. Lee and Liebler, {D. C.} and H. Moustakas and M. Na and Penning, {T. M.} and G. Ritacco and J. Romine and N. Sadekar and Schultz, {T. W.} and D. Selechnik and F. Siddiqi and Sipes, {I. G.} and G. Sullivan and Y. Thakkar and Y. Tokura",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 Elsevier Ltd",

year = "2021",

month = mar,

doi = "10.1016/j.fct.2021.112047",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "149",

journal = "Food and Chemical Toxicology",

issn = "0278-6915",

publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, cyclohexanol, CAS Registry Number 108-93-0

AU - Api, A. M.

AU - Belsito, D.

AU - Biserta, S.

AU - Botelho, D.

AU - Bruze, M.

AU - Burton, G. A.

AU - Buschmann, J.

AU - Cancellieri, M. A.

AU - Dagli, M. L.

AU - Date, M.

AU - Dekant, W.

AU - Deodhar, C.

AU - Fryer, A. D.

AU - Gadhia, S.

AU - Jones, L.

AU - Joshi, K.

AU - Kumar, M.

AU - Lapczynski, A.

AU - Lavelle, M.

AU - Lee, I.

AU - Liebler, D. C.

AU - Moustakas, H.

AU - Na, M.

AU - Penning, T. M.

AU - Ritacco, G.

AU - Romine, J.

AU - Sadekar, N.

AU - Schultz, T. W.

AU - Selechnik, D.

AU - Siddiqi, F.

AU - Sipes, I. G.

AU - Sullivan, G.

AU - Thakkar, Y.

AU - Tokura, Y.

PY - 2021/3

Y1 - 2021/3

N2 - The existing information supports the use of this material as described in this safety assessment. Cyclohexanol was evaluated for genotoxicity, repeated dose toxicity, reproductive toxicity, local respiratory toxicity, phototoxicity/photoallergenicity, skin sensitization, and environmental safety. Data show that cyclohexanol is not genotoxic. Data on cyclohexanol provide a calculated margin of exposure (MOE) >100 for the repeated dose toxicity and reproductive toxicity endpoints. Data show that there are no safety concerns for cyclohexanol for skin sensitization under the current declared levels of use. The phototoxicity/photoallergenicity endpoints were evaluated based on ultraviolet (UV) spectra; cyclohexanol is not expected to be phototoxic/photoallergenic. The local respiratory toxicity endpoint was evaluated using the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) for a Cramer Class I material, and the exposure to cyclohexanol is below the TTC (1.4 mg/day). The environmental endpoints were evaluated; cyclohexanol was found not to be persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic (PBT) as per the International Fragrance Association (IFRA) Environmental Standards, and its risk quotients, based on its current volume of use in Europe and North America (i.e., Predicted Environmental Concentration/Predicted No Effect Concentration [PEC/PNEC]), are <1.

AB - The existing information supports the use of this material as described in this safety assessment. Cyclohexanol was evaluated for genotoxicity, repeated dose toxicity, reproductive toxicity, local respiratory toxicity, phototoxicity/photoallergenicity, skin sensitization, and environmental safety. Data show that cyclohexanol is not genotoxic. Data on cyclohexanol provide a calculated margin of exposure (MOE) >100 for the repeated dose toxicity and reproductive toxicity endpoints. Data show that there are no safety concerns for cyclohexanol for skin sensitization under the current declared levels of use. The phototoxicity/photoallergenicity endpoints were evaluated based on ultraviolet (UV) spectra; cyclohexanol is not expected to be phototoxic/photoallergenic. The local respiratory toxicity endpoint was evaluated using the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) for a Cramer Class I material, and the exposure to cyclohexanol is below the TTC (1.4 mg/day). The environmental endpoints were evaluated; cyclohexanol was found not to be persistent, bioaccumulative, and toxic (PBT) as per the International Fragrance Association (IFRA) Environmental Standards, and its risk quotients, based on its current volume of use in Europe and North America (i.e., Predicted Environmental Concentration/Predicted No Effect Concentration [PEC/PNEC]), are <1.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100749976&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85100749976&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.fct.2021.112047

DO - 10.1016/j.fct.2021.112047

M3 - Short survey

C2 - 33571610

AN - SCOPUS:85100749976

SN - 0278-6915

VL - 149

JO - Food and Chemical Toxicology

JF - Food and Chemical Toxicology

M1 - 112047

ER -

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, cyclohexanol, CAS Registry Number 108-93-0

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this