RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, ethyl 2-methyl-4-pentenoate, CAS Registry Number 53399-81-8

A. M. Api; D. Belsito; S. Biserta; D. Botelho; M. Bruze; G. A. Burton; J. Buschmann; M. A. Cancellieri; M. L. Dagli; M. Date; W. Dekant; C. Deodhar; A. D. Fryer; S. Gadhia; L. Jones; K. Joshi; M. Kumar; A. Lapczynski; M. Lavelle; I. Lee; D. C. Liebler; H. Moustakas; M. Na; T. M. Penning; G. Ritacco; J. Romine; N. Sadekar; T. W. Schultz; D. Selechnik; F. Siddiqi; I. G. Sipes; G. Sullivan; Y. Thakkar; Y. Tokura

doi:10.1016/j.fct.2021.112170

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, ethyl 2-methyl-4-pentenoate, CAS Registry Number 53399-81-8

A. M. Api, D. Belsito, S. Biserta, D. Botelho, M. Bruze, G. A. Burton, J. Buschmann, M. A. Cancellieri, M. L. Dagli, M. Date, W. Dekant, C. Deodhar, A. D. Fryer, S. Gadhia, L. Jones, K. Joshi, M. Kumar, A. Lapczynski, M. Lavelle, I. LeeD. C. Liebler, H. Moustakas, M. Na, T. M. Penning, G. Ritacco, J. Romine, N. Sadekar, T. W. Schultz, D. Selechnik, F. Siddiqi, I. G. Sipes, G. Sullivan, Y. Thakkar, Y. Tokura

Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Short survey › peer-review

Abstract

The existing information supports the use of this material as described in this safety assessment. Ethyl 2-methyl-4-pentenoate was evaluated for genotoxicity, repeated dose toxicity, reproductive toxicity, local respiratory toxicity, phototoxicity/photoallergenicity, skin sensitization, and environmental safety. Data from read-across analog methyl undec-10-enoate (CAS # 111-81-9) show that ethyl 2-methyl-4-pentenoate is not expected to be genotoxic. The repeated dose, reproductive, and local respiratory toxicity endpoints were evaluated using the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) for a Cramer Class I material, and the exposure to ethyl 2-methyl-4-pentenoate is below the TTC (0.03 mg/kg/day, 0.03 mg/kg/day, and 1.4 mg/day, respectively). The skin sensitization endpoint was completed using the Dermal Sensitization Threshold (DST) for non-reactive materials (900 μg/cm²); exposure is below the DST. The phototoxicity/photoallergenicity endpoints were evaluated based on ultraviolet/visible (UV/Vis) spectra; ethyl 2-methyl-4-pentenoate is not expected to be phototoxic/photoallergenic. The environmental endpoints were evaluated; ethyl 2-methyl-4-pentenoate was found not to be Persistent, Bioaccumulative, and Toxic (PBT) as per the International Fragrance Association (IFRA) Environmental Standards, and its risk quotients, based on its current volume of use in Europe and North America (i.e., Predicted Environmental Concentration/Predicted No Effect Concentration [PEC/PNEC]), are <1.

Original language	English (US)
Article number	112170
Journal	Food and Chemical Toxicology
Volume	153
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2021.112170
State	Published - Jul 2021

Keywords

And Reproductive Toxicity
Developmental
Environmental Safety
Genotoxicity
Local Respiratory Toxicity
Phototoxicity/Photoallergenicity
Repeated Dose
Skin Sensitization

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Food Science
Toxicology

Access to Document

10.1016/j.fct.2021.112170

Cite this

Api, A. M., Belsito, D., Biserta, S., Botelho, D., Bruze, M., Burton, G. A., Buschmann, J., Cancellieri, M. A., Dagli, M. L., Date, M., Dekant, W., Deodhar, C., Fryer, A. D., Gadhia, S., Jones, L., Joshi, K., Kumar, M., Lapczynski, A., Lavelle, M., ... Tokura, Y. (2021). RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, ethyl 2-methyl-4-pentenoate, CAS Registry Number 53399-81-8. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 153, Article 112170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2021.112170

Api, AM, Belsito, D, Biserta, S, Botelho, D, Bruze, M, Burton, GA, Buschmann, J, Cancellieri, MA, Dagli, ML, Date, M, Dekant, W, Deodhar, C, Fryer, AD, Gadhia, S, Jones, L, Joshi, K, Kumar, M, Lapczynski, A, Lavelle, M, Lee, I, Liebler, DC, Moustakas, H, Na, M, Penning, TM, Ritacco, G, Romine, J, Sadekar, N, Schultz, TW, Selechnik, D, Siddiqi, F, Sipes, IG, Sullivan, G, Thakkar, Y & Tokura, Y 2021, 'RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, ethyl 2-methyl-4-pentenoate, CAS Registry Number 53399-81-8', Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 153, 112170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2021.112170

@article{d8d35c124a3f41b7bed7dd89eaec233d,

title = "RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, ethyl 2-methyl-4-pentenoate, CAS Registry Number 53399-81-8",

abstract = "The existing information supports the use of this material as described in this safety assessment. Ethyl 2-methyl-4-pentenoate was evaluated for genotoxicity, repeated dose toxicity, reproductive toxicity, local respiratory toxicity, phototoxicity/photoallergenicity, skin sensitization, and environmental safety. Data from read-across analog methyl undec-10-enoate (CAS # 111-81-9) show that ethyl 2-methyl-4-pentenoate is not expected to be genotoxic. The repeated dose, reproductive, and local respiratory toxicity endpoints were evaluated using the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) for a Cramer Class I material, and the exposure to ethyl 2-methyl-4-pentenoate is below the TTC (0.03 mg/kg/day, 0.03 mg/kg/day, and 1.4 mg/day, respectively). The skin sensitization endpoint was completed using the Dermal Sensitization Threshold (DST) for non-reactive materials (900 μg/cm2); exposure is below the DST. The phototoxicity/photoallergenicity endpoints were evaluated based on ultraviolet/visible (UV/Vis) spectra; ethyl 2-methyl-4-pentenoate is not expected to be phototoxic/photoallergenic. The environmental endpoints were evaluated; ethyl 2-methyl-4-pentenoate was found not to be Persistent, Bioaccumulative, and Toxic (PBT) as per the International Fragrance Association (IFRA) Environmental Standards, and its risk quotients, based on its current volume of use in Europe and North America (i.e., Predicted Environmental Concentration/Predicted No Effect Concentration [PEC/PNEC]), are <1.",

keywords = "And Reproductive Toxicity, Developmental, Environmental Safety, Genotoxicity, Local Respiratory Toxicity, Phototoxicity/Photoallergenicity, Repeated Dose, Skin Sensitization",

author = "Api, {A. M.} and D. Belsito and S. Biserta and D. Botelho and M. Bruze and Burton, {G. A.} and J. Buschmann and Cancellieri, {M. A.} and Dagli, {M. L.} and M. Date and W. Dekant and C. Deodhar and Fryer, {A. D.} and S. Gadhia and L. Jones and K. Joshi and M. Kumar and A. Lapczynski and M. Lavelle and I. Lee and Liebler, {D. C.} and H. Moustakas and M. Na and Penning, {T. M.} and G. Ritacco and J. Romine and N. Sadekar and Schultz, {T. W.} and D. Selechnik and F. Siddiqi and Sipes, {I. G.} and G. Sullivan and Y. Thakkar and Y. Tokura",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 Elsevier Ltd",

year = "2021",

month = jul,

doi = "10.1016/j.fct.2021.112170",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "153",

journal = "Food and Chemical Toxicology",

issn = "0278-6915",

publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, ethyl 2-methyl-4-pentenoate, CAS Registry Number 53399-81-8

AU - Api, A. M.

AU - Belsito, D.

AU - Biserta, S.

AU - Botelho, D.

AU - Bruze, M.

AU - Burton, G. A.

AU - Buschmann, J.

AU - Cancellieri, M. A.

AU - Dagli, M. L.

AU - Date, M.

AU - Dekant, W.

AU - Deodhar, C.

AU - Fryer, A. D.

AU - Gadhia, S.

AU - Jones, L.

AU - Joshi, K.

AU - Kumar, M.

AU - Lapczynski, A.

AU - Lavelle, M.

AU - Lee, I.

AU - Liebler, D. C.

AU - Moustakas, H.

AU - Na, M.

AU - Penning, T. M.

AU - Ritacco, G.

AU - Romine, J.

AU - Sadekar, N.

AU - Schultz, T. W.

AU - Selechnik, D.

AU - Siddiqi, F.

AU - Sipes, I. G.

AU - Sullivan, G.

AU - Thakkar, Y.

AU - Tokura, Y.

PY - 2021/7

Y1 - 2021/7

N2 - The existing information supports the use of this material as described in this safety assessment. Ethyl 2-methyl-4-pentenoate was evaluated for genotoxicity, repeated dose toxicity, reproductive toxicity, local respiratory toxicity, phototoxicity/photoallergenicity, skin sensitization, and environmental safety. Data from read-across analog methyl undec-10-enoate (CAS # 111-81-9) show that ethyl 2-methyl-4-pentenoate is not expected to be genotoxic. The repeated dose, reproductive, and local respiratory toxicity endpoints were evaluated using the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) for a Cramer Class I material, and the exposure to ethyl 2-methyl-4-pentenoate is below the TTC (0.03 mg/kg/day, 0.03 mg/kg/day, and 1.4 mg/day, respectively). The skin sensitization endpoint was completed using the Dermal Sensitization Threshold (DST) for non-reactive materials (900 μg/cm2); exposure is below the DST. The phototoxicity/photoallergenicity endpoints were evaluated based on ultraviolet/visible (UV/Vis) spectra; ethyl 2-methyl-4-pentenoate is not expected to be phototoxic/photoallergenic. The environmental endpoints were evaluated; ethyl 2-methyl-4-pentenoate was found not to be Persistent, Bioaccumulative, and Toxic (PBT) as per the International Fragrance Association (IFRA) Environmental Standards, and its risk quotients, based on its current volume of use in Europe and North America (i.e., Predicted Environmental Concentration/Predicted No Effect Concentration [PEC/PNEC]), are <1.

AB - The existing information supports the use of this material as described in this safety assessment. Ethyl 2-methyl-4-pentenoate was evaluated for genotoxicity, repeated dose toxicity, reproductive toxicity, local respiratory toxicity, phototoxicity/photoallergenicity, skin sensitization, and environmental safety. Data from read-across analog methyl undec-10-enoate (CAS # 111-81-9) show that ethyl 2-methyl-4-pentenoate is not expected to be genotoxic. The repeated dose, reproductive, and local respiratory toxicity endpoints were evaluated using the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) for a Cramer Class I material, and the exposure to ethyl 2-methyl-4-pentenoate is below the TTC (0.03 mg/kg/day, 0.03 mg/kg/day, and 1.4 mg/day, respectively). The skin sensitization endpoint was completed using the Dermal Sensitization Threshold (DST) for non-reactive materials (900 μg/cm2); exposure is below the DST. The phototoxicity/photoallergenicity endpoints were evaluated based on ultraviolet/visible (UV/Vis) spectra; ethyl 2-methyl-4-pentenoate is not expected to be phototoxic/photoallergenic. The environmental endpoints were evaluated; ethyl 2-methyl-4-pentenoate was found not to be Persistent, Bioaccumulative, and Toxic (PBT) as per the International Fragrance Association (IFRA) Environmental Standards, and its risk quotients, based on its current volume of use in Europe and North America (i.e., Predicted Environmental Concentration/Predicted No Effect Concentration [PEC/PNEC]), are <1.

KW - And Reproductive Toxicity

KW - Developmental

KW - Environmental Safety

KW - Genotoxicity

KW - Local Respiratory Toxicity

KW - Phototoxicity/Photoallergenicity

KW - Repeated Dose

KW - Skin Sensitization

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85104052072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85104052072&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.fct.2021.112170

DO - 10.1016/j.fct.2021.112170

M3 - Short survey

C2 - 33838174

AN - SCOPUS:85104052072

SN - 0278-6915

VL - 153

JO - Food and Chemical Toxicology

JF - Food and Chemical Toxicology

M1 - 112170

ER -

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, ethyl 2-methyl-4-pentenoate, CAS Registry Number 53399-81-8

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this