Revisiting Comfort-Directed Therapies

Death and Dying in the Emergency Department, Including Withholding and Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment

Raquel M. Schears, Terri Schmidt

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

End-of-life issues arise frequently in the emergency department (ED). Patients and their caregivers arrive with requests for pain relief and other symptom management, need for life-sustaining interventions, or seeking options to control suffering experienced in the dying process. Some patients will arrive without prior planning, or will change their preferences for various reasons, including the influence of others. Their goals for intervention should be elicited early on in the care episode. Few will arrive with clearly defined goals and expectations, although the genesis of the dying patient's problem predates the ED visit in the trajectory of illness. Consequently, most palliative care is best integrated alongside active therapies aimed at prolongation of life and cure. Ethically, emergency physicians may appropriately withhold or withdraw life-sustaining interventions in the ED, if doing so removes treatments that do not work, are not wanted, or have become overly burdensome to the patient, but providing comfort-directed measures should continue without interruption, and clinical guidance in this area exists. This chapter discusses some of the relevant end-of-life ethical issues that have a legal basis, including US federal law ensuring the right to seek emergency care, public policy and research in the area of pain control, and the data and utility of advance directives. The evidence for life-prolonging treatment or symptom management in advanced cancer, as the rationale, for frequent ED visits at the end of life is reviewed. The chapter offers a 10-point checklist, based on the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) detailed policy to enhance end-of-life care, which fits into a basic conceptual framework keyed for busy clinicians to approach end of life and gives related guidance for comfort-directed therapies. The chapter also reviews and differentiates the ethical and legal permissibility of withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment and accepted comfort measures (i.e., palliative sedation) from that of physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationEthical Problems in Emergency Medicine: A Discussion-Based Review
PublisherJohn Wiley and Sons
Pages99-115
Number of pages17
ISBN (Print)9780470673478
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 20 2012
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Hospital Emergency Service
Therapeutics
Ethical Review
Episode of Care
Life Support Care
Assisted Suicide
Advance Directives
Pain
Terminal Care
Euthanasia
Emergency Medical Services
Public Policy
Prednisolone
Checklist
Palliative Care
Psychological Stress
Ethics
Caregivers
Emergencies
Physicians

Keywords

  • Advance directive
  • Comfort-directed therapy
  • CPR
  • Death
  • DNR
  • Dying
  • ED
  • End-of-life
  • Euthanasia
  • Palliative care
  • Physician-assisted suicide
  • Withholding/withdrawal of life-sustaining interventions

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Schears, R. M., & Schmidt, T. (2012). Revisiting Comfort-Directed Therapies: Death and Dying in the Emergency Department, Including Withholding and Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment. In Ethical Problems in Emergency Medicine: A Discussion-Based Review (pp. 99-115). John Wiley and Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118292150.ch10

Revisiting Comfort-Directed Therapies : Death and Dying in the Emergency Department, Including Withholding and Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment. / Schears, Raquel M.; Schmidt, Terri.

Ethical Problems in Emergency Medicine: A Discussion-Based Review. John Wiley and Sons, 2012. p. 99-115.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Schears, RM & Schmidt, T 2012, Revisiting Comfort-Directed Therapies: Death and Dying in the Emergency Department, Including Withholding and Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment. in Ethical Problems in Emergency Medicine: A Discussion-Based Review. John Wiley and Sons, pp. 99-115. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118292150.ch10
Schears RM, Schmidt T. Revisiting Comfort-Directed Therapies: Death and Dying in the Emergency Department, Including Withholding and Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment. In Ethical Problems in Emergency Medicine: A Discussion-Based Review. John Wiley and Sons. 2012. p. 99-115 https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118292150.ch10
Schears, Raquel M. ; Schmidt, Terri. / Revisiting Comfort-Directed Therapies : Death and Dying in the Emergency Department, Including Withholding and Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment. Ethical Problems in Emergency Medicine: A Discussion-Based Review. John Wiley and Sons, 2012. pp. 99-115
@inbook{a0c6c4a95533496cb51ea7a678b54a5f,
title = "Revisiting Comfort-Directed Therapies: Death and Dying in the Emergency Department, Including Withholding and Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment",
abstract = "End-of-life issues arise frequently in the emergency department (ED). Patients and their caregivers arrive with requests for pain relief and other symptom management, need for life-sustaining interventions, or seeking options to control suffering experienced in the dying process. Some patients will arrive without prior planning, or will change their preferences for various reasons, including the influence of others. Their goals for intervention should be elicited early on in the care episode. Few will arrive with clearly defined goals and expectations, although the genesis of the dying patient's problem predates the ED visit in the trajectory of illness. Consequently, most palliative care is best integrated alongside active therapies aimed at prolongation of life and cure. Ethically, emergency physicians may appropriately withhold or withdraw life-sustaining interventions in the ED, if doing so removes treatments that do not work, are not wanted, or have become overly burdensome to the patient, but providing comfort-directed measures should continue without interruption, and clinical guidance in this area exists. This chapter discusses some of the relevant end-of-life ethical issues that have a legal basis, including US federal law ensuring the right to seek emergency care, public policy and research in the area of pain control, and the data and utility of advance directives. The evidence for life-prolonging treatment or symptom management in advanced cancer, as the rationale, for frequent ED visits at the end of life is reviewed. The chapter offers a 10-point checklist, based on the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) detailed policy to enhance end-of-life care, which fits into a basic conceptual framework keyed for busy clinicians to approach end of life and gives related guidance for comfort-directed therapies. The chapter also reviews and differentiates the ethical and legal permissibility of withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment and accepted comfort measures (i.e., palliative sedation) from that of physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia.",
keywords = "Advance directive, Comfort-directed therapy, CPR, Death, DNR, Dying, ED, End-of-life, Euthanasia, Palliative care, Physician-assisted suicide, Withholding/withdrawal of life-sustaining interventions",
author = "Schears, {Raquel M.} and Terri Schmidt",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
day = "20",
doi = "10.1002/9781118292150.ch10",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780470673478",
pages = "99--115",
booktitle = "Ethical Problems in Emergency Medicine: A Discussion-Based Review",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Revisiting Comfort-Directed Therapies

T2 - Death and Dying in the Emergency Department, Including Withholding and Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Treatment

AU - Schears, Raquel M.

AU - Schmidt, Terri

PY - 2012/6/20

Y1 - 2012/6/20

N2 - End-of-life issues arise frequently in the emergency department (ED). Patients and their caregivers arrive with requests for pain relief and other symptom management, need for life-sustaining interventions, or seeking options to control suffering experienced in the dying process. Some patients will arrive without prior planning, or will change their preferences for various reasons, including the influence of others. Their goals for intervention should be elicited early on in the care episode. Few will arrive with clearly defined goals and expectations, although the genesis of the dying patient's problem predates the ED visit in the trajectory of illness. Consequently, most palliative care is best integrated alongside active therapies aimed at prolongation of life and cure. Ethically, emergency physicians may appropriately withhold or withdraw life-sustaining interventions in the ED, if doing so removes treatments that do not work, are not wanted, or have become overly burdensome to the patient, but providing comfort-directed measures should continue without interruption, and clinical guidance in this area exists. This chapter discusses some of the relevant end-of-life ethical issues that have a legal basis, including US federal law ensuring the right to seek emergency care, public policy and research in the area of pain control, and the data and utility of advance directives. The evidence for life-prolonging treatment or symptom management in advanced cancer, as the rationale, for frequent ED visits at the end of life is reviewed. The chapter offers a 10-point checklist, based on the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) detailed policy to enhance end-of-life care, which fits into a basic conceptual framework keyed for busy clinicians to approach end of life and gives related guidance for comfort-directed therapies. The chapter also reviews and differentiates the ethical and legal permissibility of withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment and accepted comfort measures (i.e., palliative sedation) from that of physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia.

AB - End-of-life issues arise frequently in the emergency department (ED). Patients and their caregivers arrive with requests for pain relief and other symptom management, need for life-sustaining interventions, or seeking options to control suffering experienced in the dying process. Some patients will arrive without prior planning, or will change their preferences for various reasons, including the influence of others. Their goals for intervention should be elicited early on in the care episode. Few will arrive with clearly defined goals and expectations, although the genesis of the dying patient's problem predates the ED visit in the trajectory of illness. Consequently, most palliative care is best integrated alongside active therapies aimed at prolongation of life and cure. Ethically, emergency physicians may appropriately withhold or withdraw life-sustaining interventions in the ED, if doing so removes treatments that do not work, are not wanted, or have become overly burdensome to the patient, but providing comfort-directed measures should continue without interruption, and clinical guidance in this area exists. This chapter discusses some of the relevant end-of-life ethical issues that have a legal basis, including US federal law ensuring the right to seek emergency care, public policy and research in the area of pain control, and the data and utility of advance directives. The evidence for life-prolonging treatment or symptom management in advanced cancer, as the rationale, for frequent ED visits at the end of life is reviewed. The chapter offers a 10-point checklist, based on the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) detailed policy to enhance end-of-life care, which fits into a basic conceptual framework keyed for busy clinicians to approach end of life and gives related guidance for comfort-directed therapies. The chapter also reviews and differentiates the ethical and legal permissibility of withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment and accepted comfort measures (i.e., palliative sedation) from that of physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia.

KW - Advance directive

KW - Comfort-directed therapy

KW - CPR

KW - Death

KW - DNR

KW - Dying

KW - ED

KW - End-of-life

KW - Euthanasia

KW - Palliative care

KW - Physician-assisted suicide

KW - Withholding/withdrawal of life-sustaining interventions

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84886115374&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84886115374&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/9781118292150.ch10

DO - 10.1002/9781118292150.ch10

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780470673478

SP - 99

EP - 115

BT - Ethical Problems in Emergency Medicine: A Discussion-Based Review

PB - John Wiley and Sons

ER -