Retinopathy of Prematurity Management using Single-Image vs Multiple-Image Telemedicine Examinations

Alexandra Lajoie, Susan Koreen, Lu Wang, Steven A. Kane, Thomas C. Lee, David J. Weissgold, Audina M. Berrocal, Yunling E. Du, Osode Coki, John T. Flynn, Justin Starren, Michael Chiang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To compare performance of single-image vs multiple-image telemedicine examinations for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) diagnosis. Design: Prospective comparative study. Methods: A total of 248 eyes from 67 consecutive infants underwent wide-angle retinal imaging by a trained neonatal nurse at 31 to 33 weeks and/or 35 to 37 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA) at a single academic institution. Data were uploaded to a web-based telemedicine system and interpreted by three masked retinal specialists. Diagnoses were provided based on single images, and subsequently on multiple images, from both eyes of each infant. Findings were compared to a reference standard of indirect ophthalmoscopy by a pediatric ophthalmologist. Primary outcome measures were recommended follow-up interval, presence of plus disease, presence of type-2 or worse ROP, and presence of visible peripheral ROP. Results: Among the three graders, mean sensitivity/specificity for detection of infants requiring follow-up in less than one week were 0.85/0.93 by single-image examination and 0.91/0.88 by multiple-image examination at 35 to 37 weeks PMA. Mean sensitivity/specificity for detection of infants with type-2 or worse ROP were 0.82/0.95 by single-image examination and 1.00/0.91 by multiple-image examination at 35 to 37 weeks PMA. Mean sensitivity/specificity for detection of plus disease were 1.00/0.86 by single-image examination and 1.00/0.87 by multiple-image examination at 35 to 37 weeks PMA. There were no statistically-significant intragrader differences between accuracy of single-image and multiple-image telemedicine examinations for detection of plus disease. Conclusions: Single-image and multiple-image telemedicine examinations perform comparably for determination of recommended follow-up interval and detection of plus disease. This may have implications for development of screening protocols, particularly in areas with limited access to ophthalmic care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAmerican Journal of Ophthalmology
Volume146
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2008
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Retinopathy of Prematurity
Telemedicine
Sensitivity and Specificity
Ophthalmoscopy
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Prospective Studies
Pediatrics

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Retinopathy of Prematurity Management using Single-Image vs Multiple-Image Telemedicine Examinations. / Lajoie, Alexandra; Koreen, Susan; Wang, Lu; Kane, Steven A.; Lee, Thomas C.; Weissgold, David J.; Berrocal, Audina M.; Du, Yunling E.; Coki, Osode; Flynn, John T.; Starren, Justin; Chiang, Michael.

In: American Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 146, No. 2, 08.2008.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lajoie, A, Koreen, S, Wang, L, Kane, SA, Lee, TC, Weissgold, DJ, Berrocal, AM, Du, YE, Coki, O, Flynn, JT, Starren, J & Chiang, M 2008, 'Retinopathy of Prematurity Management using Single-Image vs Multiple-Image Telemedicine Examinations', American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 146, no. 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2008.04.012
Lajoie, Alexandra ; Koreen, Susan ; Wang, Lu ; Kane, Steven A. ; Lee, Thomas C. ; Weissgold, David J. ; Berrocal, Audina M. ; Du, Yunling E. ; Coki, Osode ; Flynn, John T. ; Starren, Justin ; Chiang, Michael. / Retinopathy of Prematurity Management using Single-Image vs Multiple-Image Telemedicine Examinations. In: American Journal of Ophthalmology. 2008 ; Vol. 146, No. 2.
@article{2bf3ae234c3a439bafb7e6cddb5403bc,
title = "Retinopathy of Prematurity Management using Single-Image vs Multiple-Image Telemedicine Examinations",
abstract = "Purpose: To compare performance of single-image vs multiple-image telemedicine examinations for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) diagnosis. Design: Prospective comparative study. Methods: A total of 248 eyes from 67 consecutive infants underwent wide-angle retinal imaging by a trained neonatal nurse at 31 to 33 weeks and/or 35 to 37 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA) at a single academic institution. Data were uploaded to a web-based telemedicine system and interpreted by three masked retinal specialists. Diagnoses were provided based on single images, and subsequently on multiple images, from both eyes of each infant. Findings were compared to a reference standard of indirect ophthalmoscopy by a pediatric ophthalmologist. Primary outcome measures were recommended follow-up interval, presence of plus disease, presence of type-2 or worse ROP, and presence of visible peripheral ROP. Results: Among the three graders, mean sensitivity/specificity for detection of infants requiring follow-up in less than one week were 0.85/0.93 by single-image examination and 0.91/0.88 by multiple-image examination at 35 to 37 weeks PMA. Mean sensitivity/specificity for detection of infants with type-2 or worse ROP were 0.82/0.95 by single-image examination and 1.00/0.91 by multiple-image examination at 35 to 37 weeks PMA. Mean sensitivity/specificity for detection of plus disease were 1.00/0.86 by single-image examination and 1.00/0.87 by multiple-image examination at 35 to 37 weeks PMA. There were no statistically-significant intragrader differences between accuracy of single-image and multiple-image telemedicine examinations for detection of plus disease. Conclusions: Single-image and multiple-image telemedicine examinations perform comparably for determination of recommended follow-up interval and detection of plus disease. This may have implications for development of screening protocols, particularly in areas with limited access to ophthalmic care.",
author = "Alexandra Lajoie and Susan Koreen and Lu Wang and Kane, {Steven A.} and Lee, {Thomas C.} and Weissgold, {David J.} and Berrocal, {Audina M.} and Du, {Yunling E.} and Osode Coki and Flynn, {John T.} and Justin Starren and Michael Chiang",
year = "2008",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.ajo.2008.04.012",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "146",
journal = "American Journal of Ophthalmology",
issn = "0002-9394",
publisher = "Elsevier USA",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Retinopathy of Prematurity Management using Single-Image vs Multiple-Image Telemedicine Examinations

AU - Lajoie, Alexandra

AU - Koreen, Susan

AU - Wang, Lu

AU - Kane, Steven A.

AU - Lee, Thomas C.

AU - Weissgold, David J.

AU - Berrocal, Audina M.

AU - Du, Yunling E.

AU - Coki, Osode

AU - Flynn, John T.

AU - Starren, Justin

AU - Chiang, Michael

PY - 2008/8

Y1 - 2008/8

N2 - Purpose: To compare performance of single-image vs multiple-image telemedicine examinations for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) diagnosis. Design: Prospective comparative study. Methods: A total of 248 eyes from 67 consecutive infants underwent wide-angle retinal imaging by a trained neonatal nurse at 31 to 33 weeks and/or 35 to 37 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA) at a single academic institution. Data were uploaded to a web-based telemedicine system and interpreted by three masked retinal specialists. Diagnoses were provided based on single images, and subsequently on multiple images, from both eyes of each infant. Findings were compared to a reference standard of indirect ophthalmoscopy by a pediatric ophthalmologist. Primary outcome measures were recommended follow-up interval, presence of plus disease, presence of type-2 or worse ROP, and presence of visible peripheral ROP. Results: Among the three graders, mean sensitivity/specificity for detection of infants requiring follow-up in less than one week were 0.85/0.93 by single-image examination and 0.91/0.88 by multiple-image examination at 35 to 37 weeks PMA. Mean sensitivity/specificity for detection of infants with type-2 or worse ROP were 0.82/0.95 by single-image examination and 1.00/0.91 by multiple-image examination at 35 to 37 weeks PMA. Mean sensitivity/specificity for detection of plus disease were 1.00/0.86 by single-image examination and 1.00/0.87 by multiple-image examination at 35 to 37 weeks PMA. There were no statistically-significant intragrader differences between accuracy of single-image and multiple-image telemedicine examinations for detection of plus disease. Conclusions: Single-image and multiple-image telemedicine examinations perform comparably for determination of recommended follow-up interval and detection of plus disease. This may have implications for development of screening protocols, particularly in areas with limited access to ophthalmic care.

AB - Purpose: To compare performance of single-image vs multiple-image telemedicine examinations for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) diagnosis. Design: Prospective comparative study. Methods: A total of 248 eyes from 67 consecutive infants underwent wide-angle retinal imaging by a trained neonatal nurse at 31 to 33 weeks and/or 35 to 37 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA) at a single academic institution. Data were uploaded to a web-based telemedicine system and interpreted by three masked retinal specialists. Diagnoses were provided based on single images, and subsequently on multiple images, from both eyes of each infant. Findings were compared to a reference standard of indirect ophthalmoscopy by a pediatric ophthalmologist. Primary outcome measures were recommended follow-up interval, presence of plus disease, presence of type-2 or worse ROP, and presence of visible peripheral ROP. Results: Among the three graders, mean sensitivity/specificity for detection of infants requiring follow-up in less than one week were 0.85/0.93 by single-image examination and 0.91/0.88 by multiple-image examination at 35 to 37 weeks PMA. Mean sensitivity/specificity for detection of infants with type-2 or worse ROP were 0.82/0.95 by single-image examination and 1.00/0.91 by multiple-image examination at 35 to 37 weeks PMA. Mean sensitivity/specificity for detection of plus disease were 1.00/0.86 by single-image examination and 1.00/0.87 by multiple-image examination at 35 to 37 weeks PMA. There were no statistically-significant intragrader differences between accuracy of single-image and multiple-image telemedicine examinations for detection of plus disease. Conclusions: Single-image and multiple-image telemedicine examinations perform comparably for determination of recommended follow-up interval and detection of plus disease. This may have implications for development of screening protocols, particularly in areas with limited access to ophthalmic care.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=47549096206&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=47549096206&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.04.012

DO - 10.1016/j.ajo.2008.04.012

M3 - Article

C2 - 18547536

AN - SCOPUS:47549096206

VL - 146

JO - American Journal of Ophthalmology

JF - American Journal of Ophthalmology

SN - 0002-9394

IS - 2

ER -