Response Inhibition and Disruptive Behaviors: Toward a Multiprocess Conception of Etiological Heterogeneity for ADHD Combined Type and Conduct Disorder Early-Onset Type

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

72 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Response disinhibition is one of several processes that may account for disruptive behavior problems. It is associated with both attention deficits/ hyperactivity (ADHD-C) and early onset, unsocialized conduct disorder (CD-E). Response inhibition is not a unitary construct. It is best understood via a dual process model of regulatory control. Executive inhibition refers to deliberate suppression of immediate motor behavior in the service of a distal goal in working memory, with relatively low anxiety activation. It is instantiated in the same frontal-striatal-thalamic neural loops as executive function and corresponds in temperament theory to effortful control. Motivational or reactive inhibition refers to anxiety-provoked interruption of behavior in the context of unexpected, novel, or punishment-cue indicators. Along with reward-response and hostile/angry response it corresponds to reactivity in temperament theory, and invokes limbic responsivity. With regard to these types of inhibitory control, ADHD-combined type is predominantly associated with dysfunctional executive inhibition. CD-E is predominantly associated with dysfunctions in the motivational inhibition process, with smaller, secondary effects in executive control. However, In both syndromes etiological heterogeneity is notable. For example, recent evidence indicates that executive inhibitory control is familial, but characterizes only a subset of children with ADHD-C. Recent dual-process models for both ADHD-C and CD-E are therefore important; they are noted and integrated. Examination of the correlates of behavioral inhibition in the subgroups with these inhibitory deficits may prove fruitful in clarifying the diverse routes to disruptive psychopathology in children.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)170-182
Number of pages13
JournalAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Volume1008
DOIs
StatePublished - 2003
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Conduct Disorder
Executive Function
Temperament
Reactive Inhibition
Anxiety
Corpus Striatum
Punishment
Psychopathology
Reward
Short-Term Memory
Cues
Chemical activation
Inhibition (Psychology)
Problem Behavior
Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
Conception
Onset
Data storage equipment

Keywords

  • ADHD
  • Conduct disorder
  • Dual-process models
  • Executive control
  • Heterogeneity
  • Hyperactivity
  • Inhibition
  • Psychopathy
  • Reactivity

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology(all)

Cite this

@article{73c7bff6b8f8459b92a08186ac33593d,
title = "Response Inhibition and Disruptive Behaviors: Toward a Multiprocess Conception of Etiological Heterogeneity for ADHD Combined Type and Conduct Disorder Early-Onset Type",
abstract = "Response disinhibition is one of several processes that may account for disruptive behavior problems. It is associated with both attention deficits/ hyperactivity (ADHD-C) and early onset, unsocialized conduct disorder (CD-E). Response inhibition is not a unitary construct. It is best understood via a dual process model of regulatory control. Executive inhibition refers to deliberate suppression of immediate motor behavior in the service of a distal goal in working memory, with relatively low anxiety activation. It is instantiated in the same frontal-striatal-thalamic neural loops as executive function and corresponds in temperament theory to effortful control. Motivational or reactive inhibition refers to anxiety-provoked interruption of behavior in the context of unexpected, novel, or punishment-cue indicators. Along with reward-response and hostile/angry response it corresponds to reactivity in temperament theory, and invokes limbic responsivity. With regard to these types of inhibitory control, ADHD-combined type is predominantly associated with dysfunctional executive inhibition. CD-E is predominantly associated with dysfunctions in the motivational inhibition process, with smaller, secondary effects in executive control. However, In both syndromes etiological heterogeneity is notable. For example, recent evidence indicates that executive inhibitory control is familial, but characterizes only a subset of children with ADHD-C. Recent dual-process models for both ADHD-C and CD-E are therefore important; they are noted and integrated. Examination of the correlates of behavioral inhibition in the subgroups with these inhibitory deficits may prove fruitful in clarifying the diverse routes to disruptive psychopathology in children.",
keywords = "ADHD, Conduct disorder, Dual-process models, Executive control, Heterogeneity, Hyperactivity, Inhibition, Psychopathy, Reactivity",
author = "Joel Nigg",
year = "2003",
doi = "10.1196/annals.1301.018",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "1008",
pages = "170--182",
journal = "Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences",
issn = "0077-8923",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response Inhibition and Disruptive Behaviors

T2 - Toward a Multiprocess Conception of Etiological Heterogeneity for ADHD Combined Type and Conduct Disorder Early-Onset Type

AU - Nigg, Joel

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - Response disinhibition is one of several processes that may account for disruptive behavior problems. It is associated with both attention deficits/ hyperactivity (ADHD-C) and early onset, unsocialized conduct disorder (CD-E). Response inhibition is not a unitary construct. It is best understood via a dual process model of regulatory control. Executive inhibition refers to deliberate suppression of immediate motor behavior in the service of a distal goal in working memory, with relatively low anxiety activation. It is instantiated in the same frontal-striatal-thalamic neural loops as executive function and corresponds in temperament theory to effortful control. Motivational or reactive inhibition refers to anxiety-provoked interruption of behavior in the context of unexpected, novel, or punishment-cue indicators. Along with reward-response and hostile/angry response it corresponds to reactivity in temperament theory, and invokes limbic responsivity. With regard to these types of inhibitory control, ADHD-combined type is predominantly associated with dysfunctional executive inhibition. CD-E is predominantly associated with dysfunctions in the motivational inhibition process, with smaller, secondary effects in executive control. However, In both syndromes etiological heterogeneity is notable. For example, recent evidence indicates that executive inhibitory control is familial, but characterizes only a subset of children with ADHD-C. Recent dual-process models for both ADHD-C and CD-E are therefore important; they are noted and integrated. Examination of the correlates of behavioral inhibition in the subgroups with these inhibitory deficits may prove fruitful in clarifying the diverse routes to disruptive psychopathology in children.

AB - Response disinhibition is one of several processes that may account for disruptive behavior problems. It is associated with both attention deficits/ hyperactivity (ADHD-C) and early onset, unsocialized conduct disorder (CD-E). Response inhibition is not a unitary construct. It is best understood via a dual process model of regulatory control. Executive inhibition refers to deliberate suppression of immediate motor behavior in the service of a distal goal in working memory, with relatively low anxiety activation. It is instantiated in the same frontal-striatal-thalamic neural loops as executive function and corresponds in temperament theory to effortful control. Motivational or reactive inhibition refers to anxiety-provoked interruption of behavior in the context of unexpected, novel, or punishment-cue indicators. Along with reward-response and hostile/angry response it corresponds to reactivity in temperament theory, and invokes limbic responsivity. With regard to these types of inhibitory control, ADHD-combined type is predominantly associated with dysfunctional executive inhibition. CD-E is predominantly associated with dysfunctions in the motivational inhibition process, with smaller, secondary effects in executive control. However, In both syndromes etiological heterogeneity is notable. For example, recent evidence indicates that executive inhibitory control is familial, but characterizes only a subset of children with ADHD-C. Recent dual-process models for both ADHD-C and CD-E are therefore important; they are noted and integrated. Examination of the correlates of behavioral inhibition in the subgroups with these inhibitory deficits may prove fruitful in clarifying the diverse routes to disruptive psychopathology in children.

KW - ADHD

KW - Conduct disorder

KW - Dual-process models

KW - Executive control

KW - Heterogeneity

KW - Hyperactivity

KW - Inhibition

KW - Psychopathy

KW - Reactivity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=1342305355&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=1342305355&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1196/annals.1301.018

DO - 10.1196/annals.1301.018

M3 - Article

C2 - 14998883

AN - SCOPUS:1342305355

VL - 1008

SP - 170

EP - 182

JO - Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

JF - Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

SN - 0077-8923

ER -