Responding to surrogate requests that seem inconsistent with a patient's living will

Elizabeth K. Vig, Rebecca L. Sudore, Karina M. Berg, Erik K. Fromme, Robert M. Arnold

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    10 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Clinicians may feel conflicted when a patient's legal decision maker is making decisions that seem inconsistent with a patient's living will. We provide evidence-based information to help clinicians consider whether a surrogate's inconsistent decisions are ethically appropriate. Surrogates are not flawless translators of their loved one's preferences; they are influenced by their own hopes and the current clinical context. Patients may be aware of this, are often concerned about burdening their loved ones, and often grant their surrogates leeway in interpreting their wishes. When appropriate, clinicians should respect surrogates' interpretations of patient values and take steps to decrease surrogate stress during the decision-making process. Finally, if clinicians are cognizant of their own values and preferences, they may recognize how these may affect their responses to certain clinical cases.

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)777-782
    Number of pages6
    JournalJournal of Pain and Symptom Management
    Volume42
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Nov 1 2011

    Keywords

    • Surrogates
    • advance directives
    • decision making
    • substituted judgment

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Nursing(all)
    • Clinical Neurology
    • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Responding to surrogate requests that seem inconsistent with a patient's living will'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this