Residency Applicant Preferences of Online Systems for Scheduling Interviews

H. Gene Hern, Charlotte P. Wills, Harrison J. Alter, Steven H. Bowman, Boyd D. Burns, Joshua Loyd, Jeffrey I. Schneider, Lalena Yarris

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND : Residency applicants often have difficulty coordinating interviews with multiple programs. An online scheduling system might improve this process.

OBJECTIVE : The authors sought to determine applicant mean time to schedule interviews and satisfaction using online scheduling compared with manual scheduling.

METHODS : An electronic survey was sent to US graduates applying to any of 6 emergency medicine programs in the 2014-2015 application cycle. Of the participant programs, 3 used an online system and 3 did not. Applicants were asked to report estimated time to schedule with the online system compared to their average time using other methods, and to rate their satisfaction with the scheduling process.

RESULTS : Of 1720 applicants to at least 1 of the 6 programs, 856 completed the survey (49.8%). Respondents reported spending less time scheduling interviews using the online system compared to other systems (median of 5 minutes [IQR 3-10] versus 60 minutes [IQR 15-240], respectively, P < .0001). In addition, applicants preferred using the online system (93.6% versus 1.4%, P < .0001.) Applicants were also more satisfied with the ease of scheduling their interviews using the online system (91.5% versus 11.0%, P < .0001) and felt that the online system aided them in coordinating travel arrangements (74.7% versus 41.5%, P < .01.).

CONCLUSIONS : An online interview scheduling system is associated with time savings for applicants as well as higher satisfaction among applicants, both in ease of scheduling and in coordinating travel arrangements. The results likely are generalizable to other medical and surgical specialties.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)759-762
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of graduate medical education
Volume8
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2016

Fingerprint

Online Systems
Internship and Residency
Interviews
Appointments and Schedules
Surgical Specialties
Emergency Medicine
Medicine

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Residency Applicant Preferences of Online Systems for Scheduling Interviews. / Hern, H. Gene; Wills, Charlotte P.; Alter, Harrison J.; Bowman, Steven H.; Burns, Boyd D.; Loyd, Joshua; Schneider, Jeffrey I.; Yarris, Lalena.

In: Journal of graduate medical education, Vol. 8, No. 5, 01.12.2016, p. 759-762.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Hern, HG, Wills, CP, Alter, HJ, Bowman, SH, Burns, BD, Loyd, J, Schneider, JI & Yarris, L 2016, 'Residency Applicant Preferences of Online Systems for Scheduling Interviews', Journal of graduate medical education, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 759-762. https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-16-00072.1
Hern, H. Gene ; Wills, Charlotte P. ; Alter, Harrison J. ; Bowman, Steven H. ; Burns, Boyd D. ; Loyd, Joshua ; Schneider, Jeffrey I. ; Yarris, Lalena. / Residency Applicant Preferences of Online Systems for Scheduling Interviews. In: Journal of graduate medical education. 2016 ; Vol. 8, No. 5. pp. 759-762.
@article{6bbded62141441219c8c66a66152ba7f,
title = "Residency Applicant Preferences of Online Systems for Scheduling Interviews",
abstract = "BACKGROUND : Residency applicants often have difficulty coordinating interviews with multiple programs. An online scheduling system might improve this process.OBJECTIVE : The authors sought to determine applicant mean time to schedule interviews and satisfaction using online scheduling compared with manual scheduling.METHODS : An electronic survey was sent to US graduates applying to any of 6 emergency medicine programs in the 2014-2015 application cycle. Of the participant programs, 3 used an online system and 3 did not. Applicants were asked to report estimated time to schedule with the online system compared to their average time using other methods, and to rate their satisfaction with the scheduling process.RESULTS : Of 1720 applicants to at least 1 of the 6 programs, 856 completed the survey (49.8{\%}). Respondents reported spending less time scheduling interviews using the online system compared to other systems (median of 5 minutes [IQR 3-10] versus 60 minutes [IQR 15-240], respectively, P < .0001). In addition, applicants preferred using the online system (93.6{\%} versus 1.4{\%}, P < .0001.) Applicants were also more satisfied with the ease of scheduling their interviews using the online system (91.5{\%} versus 11.0{\%}, P < .0001) and felt that the online system aided them in coordinating travel arrangements (74.7{\%} versus 41.5{\%}, P < .01.).CONCLUSIONS : An online interview scheduling system is associated with time savings for applicants as well as higher satisfaction among applicants, both in ease of scheduling and in coordinating travel arrangements. The results likely are generalizable to other medical and surgical specialties.",
author = "Hern, {H. Gene} and Wills, {Charlotte P.} and Alter, {Harrison J.} and Bowman, {Steven H.} and Burns, {Boyd D.} and Joshua Loyd and Schneider, {Jeffrey I.} and Lalena Yarris",
year = "2016",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4300/JGME-D-16-00072.1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
pages = "759--762",
journal = "Journal of graduate medical education",
issn = "1949-8349",
publisher = "University of Finance and Management",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Residency Applicant Preferences of Online Systems for Scheduling Interviews

AU - Hern, H. Gene

AU - Wills, Charlotte P.

AU - Alter, Harrison J.

AU - Bowman, Steven H.

AU - Burns, Boyd D.

AU - Loyd, Joshua

AU - Schneider, Jeffrey I.

AU - Yarris, Lalena

PY - 2016/12/1

Y1 - 2016/12/1

N2 - BACKGROUND : Residency applicants often have difficulty coordinating interviews with multiple programs. An online scheduling system might improve this process.OBJECTIVE : The authors sought to determine applicant mean time to schedule interviews and satisfaction using online scheduling compared with manual scheduling.METHODS : An electronic survey was sent to US graduates applying to any of 6 emergency medicine programs in the 2014-2015 application cycle. Of the participant programs, 3 used an online system and 3 did not. Applicants were asked to report estimated time to schedule with the online system compared to their average time using other methods, and to rate their satisfaction with the scheduling process.RESULTS : Of 1720 applicants to at least 1 of the 6 programs, 856 completed the survey (49.8%). Respondents reported spending less time scheduling interviews using the online system compared to other systems (median of 5 minutes [IQR 3-10] versus 60 minutes [IQR 15-240], respectively, P < .0001). In addition, applicants preferred using the online system (93.6% versus 1.4%, P < .0001.) Applicants were also more satisfied with the ease of scheduling their interviews using the online system (91.5% versus 11.0%, P < .0001) and felt that the online system aided them in coordinating travel arrangements (74.7% versus 41.5%, P < .01.).CONCLUSIONS : An online interview scheduling system is associated with time savings for applicants as well as higher satisfaction among applicants, both in ease of scheduling and in coordinating travel arrangements. The results likely are generalizable to other medical and surgical specialties.

AB - BACKGROUND : Residency applicants often have difficulty coordinating interviews with multiple programs. An online scheduling system might improve this process.OBJECTIVE : The authors sought to determine applicant mean time to schedule interviews and satisfaction using online scheduling compared with manual scheduling.METHODS : An electronic survey was sent to US graduates applying to any of 6 emergency medicine programs in the 2014-2015 application cycle. Of the participant programs, 3 used an online system and 3 did not. Applicants were asked to report estimated time to schedule with the online system compared to their average time using other methods, and to rate their satisfaction with the scheduling process.RESULTS : Of 1720 applicants to at least 1 of the 6 programs, 856 completed the survey (49.8%). Respondents reported spending less time scheduling interviews using the online system compared to other systems (median of 5 minutes [IQR 3-10] versus 60 minutes [IQR 15-240], respectively, P < .0001). In addition, applicants preferred using the online system (93.6% versus 1.4%, P < .0001.) Applicants were also more satisfied with the ease of scheduling their interviews using the online system (91.5% versus 11.0%, P < .0001) and felt that the online system aided them in coordinating travel arrangements (74.7% versus 41.5%, P < .01.).CONCLUSIONS : An online interview scheduling system is associated with time savings for applicants as well as higher satisfaction among applicants, both in ease of scheduling and in coordinating travel arrangements. The results likely are generalizable to other medical and surgical specialties.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014830295&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014830295&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4300/JGME-D-16-00072.1

DO - 10.4300/JGME-D-16-00072.1

M3 - Article

C2 - 28018543

AN - SCOPUS:85014830295

VL - 8

SP - 759

EP - 762

JO - Journal of graduate medical education

JF - Journal of graduate medical education

SN - 1949-8349

IS - 5

ER -