Research Pioneers in Emergency Medicine—Reflections on Their Paths to Success and Advice to Aspiring Researchers: A Qualitative Study

Wendy C. Coates, Lalena Yarris, Samuel O. Clarke, Daniel Runde, Jacqueline Kurth, Emilie Fowlkes, Jaime Jordan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Study objective: Research in basic, translational, and clinical emergency medicine has made great strides since the formalization of emergency medicine as a specialty. Our objective is to identify and analyze strategies used by emergency medicine research pioneers to inform further advancement of research in emergency medicine, particularly for aspiring researchers and those in emerging areas, using emergency medicine medical education as one example. Methods: This was a prospective, grounded-theory, qualitative study, using a constructivist/interpretivist paradigm. Leading basic science, translational, and clinical emergency medicine researchers who completed residency before 1995 were eligible for structured interviews. Thematic coding followed an iterative process until saturation was reached. A theoretic model was developed and analyzed. Results: Research pioneers valued advanced methodological training and mentorship. Barriers to funding were lack of recognition of emergency medicine as a specialty, absence of a research history, and lack of training and funding resources. Deliberate interventions to improve emergency medicine research included educational sessions at national meetings, external (to emergency medicine) mentor pairings, targeted funding by emergency medicine organizations, and involvement with funding agencies. Pioneers facilitate research excellence by serving as mentors and allocating funds or protected time to develop researchers. To advance emerging subfields of research in emergency medicine, pioneers recommend advanced methodological training that is specific to the area, deliberate mentorship, and the formation of research consortia to conduct generalizable outcomes-based studies. Conclusion: Research pioneers in emergency medicine cite mentorship, advanced skills obtained through fellowship or graduate degrees, deliberate collaboration with experienced researchers, support from emergency medicine organizations, and forming networks as the cornerstones of success.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalAnnals of Emergency Medicine
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - Jan 1 2018

Fingerprint

Emergency Medicine
Emergencies
Research Personnel
Research
Mentors
Clinical Medicine
Organizations
Financial Management
Internship and Residency
Medical Education
Theoretical Models
History

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Research Pioneers in Emergency Medicine—Reflections on Their Paths to Success and Advice to Aspiring Researchers : A Qualitative Study. / Coates, Wendy C.; Yarris, Lalena; Clarke, Samuel O.; Runde, Daniel; Kurth, Jacqueline; Fowlkes, Emilie; Jordan, Jaime.

In: Annals of Emergency Medicine, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Coates, Wendy C. ; Yarris, Lalena ; Clarke, Samuel O. ; Runde, Daniel ; Kurth, Jacqueline ; Fowlkes, Emilie ; Jordan, Jaime. / Research Pioneers in Emergency Medicine—Reflections on Their Paths to Success and Advice to Aspiring Researchers : A Qualitative Study. In: Annals of Emergency Medicine. 2018.
@article{78478dfcd41942bf8cb1f00567f79969,
title = "Research Pioneers in Emergency Medicine—Reflections on Their Paths to Success and Advice to Aspiring Researchers: A Qualitative Study",
abstract = "Study objective: Research in basic, translational, and clinical emergency medicine has made great strides since the formalization of emergency medicine as a specialty. Our objective is to identify and analyze strategies used by emergency medicine research pioneers to inform further advancement of research in emergency medicine, particularly for aspiring researchers and those in emerging areas, using emergency medicine medical education as one example. Methods: This was a prospective, grounded-theory, qualitative study, using a constructivist/interpretivist paradigm. Leading basic science, translational, and clinical emergency medicine researchers who completed residency before 1995 were eligible for structured interviews. Thematic coding followed an iterative process until saturation was reached. A theoretic model was developed and analyzed. Results: Research pioneers valued advanced methodological training and mentorship. Barriers to funding were lack of recognition of emergency medicine as a specialty, absence of a research history, and lack of training and funding resources. Deliberate interventions to improve emergency medicine research included educational sessions at national meetings, external (to emergency medicine) mentor pairings, targeted funding by emergency medicine organizations, and involvement with funding agencies. Pioneers facilitate research excellence by serving as mentors and allocating funds or protected time to develop researchers. To advance emerging subfields of research in emergency medicine, pioneers recommend advanced methodological training that is specific to the area, deliberate mentorship, and the formation of research consortia to conduct generalizable outcomes-based studies. Conclusion: Research pioneers in emergency medicine cite mentorship, advanced skills obtained through fellowship or graduate degrees, deliberate collaboration with experienced researchers, support from emergency medicine organizations, and forming networks as the cornerstones of success.",
author = "Coates, {Wendy C.} and Lalena Yarris and Clarke, {Samuel O.} and Daniel Runde and Jacqueline Kurth and Emilie Fowlkes and Jaime Jordan",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.10.033",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Annals of Emergency Medicine",
issn = "0196-0644",
publisher = "Mosby Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Research Pioneers in Emergency Medicine—Reflections on Their Paths to Success and Advice to Aspiring Researchers

T2 - A Qualitative Study

AU - Coates, Wendy C.

AU - Yarris, Lalena

AU - Clarke, Samuel O.

AU - Runde, Daniel

AU - Kurth, Jacqueline

AU - Fowlkes, Emilie

AU - Jordan, Jaime

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Study objective: Research in basic, translational, and clinical emergency medicine has made great strides since the formalization of emergency medicine as a specialty. Our objective is to identify and analyze strategies used by emergency medicine research pioneers to inform further advancement of research in emergency medicine, particularly for aspiring researchers and those in emerging areas, using emergency medicine medical education as one example. Methods: This was a prospective, grounded-theory, qualitative study, using a constructivist/interpretivist paradigm. Leading basic science, translational, and clinical emergency medicine researchers who completed residency before 1995 were eligible for structured interviews. Thematic coding followed an iterative process until saturation was reached. A theoretic model was developed and analyzed. Results: Research pioneers valued advanced methodological training and mentorship. Barriers to funding were lack of recognition of emergency medicine as a specialty, absence of a research history, and lack of training and funding resources. Deliberate interventions to improve emergency medicine research included educational sessions at national meetings, external (to emergency medicine) mentor pairings, targeted funding by emergency medicine organizations, and involvement with funding agencies. Pioneers facilitate research excellence by serving as mentors and allocating funds or protected time to develop researchers. To advance emerging subfields of research in emergency medicine, pioneers recommend advanced methodological training that is specific to the area, deliberate mentorship, and the formation of research consortia to conduct generalizable outcomes-based studies. Conclusion: Research pioneers in emergency medicine cite mentorship, advanced skills obtained through fellowship or graduate degrees, deliberate collaboration with experienced researchers, support from emergency medicine organizations, and forming networks as the cornerstones of success.

AB - Study objective: Research in basic, translational, and clinical emergency medicine has made great strides since the formalization of emergency medicine as a specialty. Our objective is to identify and analyze strategies used by emergency medicine research pioneers to inform further advancement of research in emergency medicine, particularly for aspiring researchers and those in emerging areas, using emergency medicine medical education as one example. Methods: This was a prospective, grounded-theory, qualitative study, using a constructivist/interpretivist paradigm. Leading basic science, translational, and clinical emergency medicine researchers who completed residency before 1995 were eligible for structured interviews. Thematic coding followed an iterative process until saturation was reached. A theoretic model was developed and analyzed. Results: Research pioneers valued advanced methodological training and mentorship. Barriers to funding were lack of recognition of emergency medicine as a specialty, absence of a research history, and lack of training and funding resources. Deliberate interventions to improve emergency medicine research included educational sessions at national meetings, external (to emergency medicine) mentor pairings, targeted funding by emergency medicine organizations, and involvement with funding agencies. Pioneers facilitate research excellence by serving as mentors and allocating funds or protected time to develop researchers. To advance emerging subfields of research in emergency medicine, pioneers recommend advanced methodological training that is specific to the area, deliberate mentorship, and the formation of research consortia to conduct generalizable outcomes-based studies. Conclusion: Research pioneers in emergency medicine cite mentorship, advanced skills obtained through fellowship or graduate degrees, deliberate collaboration with experienced researchers, support from emergency medicine organizations, and forming networks as the cornerstones of success.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057625305&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057625305&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.10.033

DO - 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.10.033

M3 - Article

C2 - 30529113

AN - SCOPUS:85057625305

JO - Annals of Emergency Medicine

JF - Annals of Emergency Medicine

SN - 0196-0644

ER -