Research engagement of health sciences librarians: A survey of research-related activities and attitudes

Susan Lessick, Carol Perryman, Brooke L. Billman, Kristine Alpi, Sandra L. De Groote, Ted D. Babin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: The extent to which health sciences librarians are engaged in research is a little-studied question. This study assesses the research activities and attitudes of Medical Library Association (MLA) members, including the influence of work affiliation. Methods: An online survey was designed using a combination of multiple-choice and open-ended questions and distributed to MLA members. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics, content analysis, and significance testing. The authors used statistical tools and categorized open ended question topics by the constant comparative method, also applying the broad subject categories used in a prior study. Pearson’s chi-square analysis was performed on responses to determine significant differences among respondents employed in three different institutional environments. Results: Analysis showed that 79% of respondents read research articles at least once a month; 58% applied published research studies to practice; 44% had conducted research; 62% reported acting on research had enhanced their libraries; 38% had presented findings; and 34% had authored research articles. Hospital librarians were significantly less likely than academic librarians to have participated in research activities. Highly ranked research benefits, barriers, and competencies of health sciences librarians are described. Conclusions: Findings indicate that health sciences librarians are actively engaged in research activities. Practice implications for practitioners, publishers, and stakeholders are discussed. Results suggest that practitioners can use published research results and results from their own research to affect practice decisions and improve services. Future studies are needed to confirm and extend these findings, including the need for intervention studies to increase research and writing productivity.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)166-173
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of the Medical Library Association
Volume104
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2016
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Librarians
health science
librarian
Health
Research
Surveys and Questionnaires
Library Associations
Medical Libraries
descriptive statistics
online survey
research results
Libraries
content analysis

Keywords

  • Libraries, medical
  • Library science research
  • Library surveys
  • Research report

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics
  • Library and Information Sciences

Cite this

Research engagement of health sciences librarians : A survey of research-related activities and attitudes. / Lessick, Susan; Perryman, Carol; Billman, Brooke L.; Alpi, Kristine; De Groote, Sandra L.; Babin, Ted D.

In: Journal of the Medical Library Association, Vol. 104, No. 2, 01.04.2016, p. 166-173.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Lessick, Susan ; Perryman, Carol ; Billman, Brooke L. ; Alpi, Kristine ; De Groote, Sandra L. ; Babin, Ted D. / Research engagement of health sciences librarians : A survey of research-related activities and attitudes. In: Journal of the Medical Library Association. 2016 ; Vol. 104, No. 2. pp. 166-173.
@article{86e55445e60e4b208aeb0362f9c6202b,
title = "Research engagement of health sciences librarians: A survey of research-related activities and attitudes",
abstract = "Introduction: The extent to which health sciences librarians are engaged in research is a little-studied question. This study assesses the research activities and attitudes of Medical Library Association (MLA) members, including the influence of work affiliation. Methods: An online survey was designed using a combination of multiple-choice and open-ended questions and distributed to MLA members. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics, content analysis, and significance testing. The authors used statistical tools and categorized open ended question topics by the constant comparative method, also applying the broad subject categories used in a prior study. Pearson’s chi-square analysis was performed on responses to determine significant differences among respondents employed in three different institutional environments. Results: Analysis showed that 79{\%} of respondents read research articles at least once a month; 58{\%} applied published research studies to practice; 44{\%} had conducted research; 62{\%} reported acting on research had enhanced their libraries; 38{\%} had presented findings; and 34{\%} had authored research articles. Hospital librarians were significantly less likely than academic librarians to have participated in research activities. Highly ranked research benefits, barriers, and competencies of health sciences librarians are described. Conclusions: Findings indicate that health sciences librarians are actively engaged in research activities. Practice implications for practitioners, publishers, and stakeholders are discussed. Results suggest that practitioners can use published research results and results from their own research to affect practice decisions and improve services. Future studies are needed to confirm and extend these findings, including the need for intervention studies to increase research and writing productivity.",
keywords = "Libraries, medical, Library science research, Library surveys, Research report",
author = "Susan Lessick and Carol Perryman and Billman, {Brooke L.} and Kristine Alpi and {De Groote}, {Sandra L.} and Babin, {Ted D.}",
year = "2016",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3163/1536-5050.104.2.015",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "104",
pages = "166--173",
journal = "Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA",
issn = "1536-5050",
publisher = "Medical Library Association",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Research engagement of health sciences librarians

T2 - A survey of research-related activities and attitudes

AU - Lessick, Susan

AU - Perryman, Carol

AU - Billman, Brooke L.

AU - Alpi, Kristine

AU - De Groote, Sandra L.

AU - Babin, Ted D.

PY - 2016/4/1

Y1 - 2016/4/1

N2 - Introduction: The extent to which health sciences librarians are engaged in research is a little-studied question. This study assesses the research activities and attitudes of Medical Library Association (MLA) members, including the influence of work affiliation. Methods: An online survey was designed using a combination of multiple-choice and open-ended questions and distributed to MLA members. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics, content analysis, and significance testing. The authors used statistical tools and categorized open ended question topics by the constant comparative method, also applying the broad subject categories used in a prior study. Pearson’s chi-square analysis was performed on responses to determine significant differences among respondents employed in three different institutional environments. Results: Analysis showed that 79% of respondents read research articles at least once a month; 58% applied published research studies to practice; 44% had conducted research; 62% reported acting on research had enhanced their libraries; 38% had presented findings; and 34% had authored research articles. Hospital librarians were significantly less likely than academic librarians to have participated in research activities. Highly ranked research benefits, barriers, and competencies of health sciences librarians are described. Conclusions: Findings indicate that health sciences librarians are actively engaged in research activities. Practice implications for practitioners, publishers, and stakeholders are discussed. Results suggest that practitioners can use published research results and results from their own research to affect practice decisions and improve services. Future studies are needed to confirm and extend these findings, including the need for intervention studies to increase research and writing productivity.

AB - Introduction: The extent to which health sciences librarians are engaged in research is a little-studied question. This study assesses the research activities and attitudes of Medical Library Association (MLA) members, including the influence of work affiliation. Methods: An online survey was designed using a combination of multiple-choice and open-ended questions and distributed to MLA members. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics, content analysis, and significance testing. The authors used statistical tools and categorized open ended question topics by the constant comparative method, also applying the broad subject categories used in a prior study. Pearson’s chi-square analysis was performed on responses to determine significant differences among respondents employed in three different institutional environments. Results: Analysis showed that 79% of respondents read research articles at least once a month; 58% applied published research studies to practice; 44% had conducted research; 62% reported acting on research had enhanced their libraries; 38% had presented findings; and 34% had authored research articles. Hospital librarians were significantly less likely than academic librarians to have participated in research activities. Highly ranked research benefits, barriers, and competencies of health sciences librarians are described. Conclusions: Findings indicate that health sciences librarians are actively engaged in research activities. Practice implications for practitioners, publishers, and stakeholders are discussed. Results suggest that practitioners can use published research results and results from their own research to affect practice decisions and improve services. Future studies are needed to confirm and extend these findings, including the need for intervention studies to increase research and writing productivity.

KW - Libraries, medical

KW - Library science research

KW - Library surveys

KW - Research report

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964323890&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964323890&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3163/1536-5050.104.2.015

DO - 10.3163/1536-5050.104.2.015

M3 - Article

C2 - 27076808

AN - SCOPUS:84964323890

VL - 104

SP - 166

EP - 173

JO - Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA

JF - Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA

SN - 1536-5050

IS - 2

ER -