Reporting weight change

Standardized reporting accounting for baseline weight

Steven H. Belle, Paul D. Berk, Anita P. Courcoulas, Scott Engel, David R. Flum, William Gourash, Mary Horlick, Jesse Y. Hsu, Saurabh Khandelwal, James E. Mitchell, Robert W. O'Rourke, Walter Pories, Beth Schrope, Bruce Wolfe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Although it is recognized that a standardized approach to reporting weight change is essential to meaningful comparisons among cohorts and across studies, consensus is lacking. This study aimed to propose a method of reporting weight change that would allow meaningful comparisons among studies of patients who underwent bariatric surgery and to demonstrate its utility using an example from the Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS). Methods: Relationships among several measures of weight change are described. Results from an observational, longitudinal cohort study of adults undergoing bariatric surgery and from simulation studies are used to illustrate the proposed method. Results: Baseline weight is a critical parameter when assessing weight change. Men undergoing a bariatric procedure other than gastric bypass or adjustable band tended to have greater weight loss 12 months after surgery than men undergoing gastric bypass when not accounting for baseline weight, but the opposite was found when results were adjusted for baseline weight. Simulation results show that with relatively modest sample sizes, the adjusted weight loss was significantly different between the 2 groups of men. Conclusion: A consistent metric for reporting weight loss after bariatric surgery is essential to interpret outcomes across studies and among subgroups. The baseline weight adjusted percent of weight loss (A%WL) uses a standard population (e.g., the LABS cohort) to account for differences between cohorts with respect to baseline weight, and its use can change the interpretation of results compared with an unadjusted measure.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)782-789
Number of pages8
JournalSurgery for Obesity and Related Diseases
Volume9
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2013

Fingerprint

Bariatric Surgery
Weights and Measures
Weight Loss
Gastric Bypass
Cohort Studies
Bariatrics
Sample Size
Longitudinal Studies
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Population

Keywords

  • Bariatric surgery
  • Obesity
  • Weight change

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this

Reporting weight change : Standardized reporting accounting for baseline weight. / Belle, Steven H.; Berk, Paul D.; Courcoulas, Anita P.; Engel, Scott; Flum, David R.; Gourash, William; Horlick, Mary; Hsu, Jesse Y.; Khandelwal, Saurabh; Mitchell, James E.; O'Rourke, Robert W.; Pories, Walter; Schrope, Beth; Wolfe, Bruce.

In: Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, Vol. 9, No. 5, 09.2013, p. 782-789.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Belle, SH, Berk, PD, Courcoulas, AP, Engel, S, Flum, DR, Gourash, W, Horlick, M, Hsu, JY, Khandelwal, S, Mitchell, JE, O'Rourke, RW, Pories, W, Schrope, B & Wolfe, B 2013, 'Reporting weight change: Standardized reporting accounting for baseline weight', Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 782-789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2012.11.006
Belle, Steven H. ; Berk, Paul D. ; Courcoulas, Anita P. ; Engel, Scott ; Flum, David R. ; Gourash, William ; Horlick, Mary ; Hsu, Jesse Y. ; Khandelwal, Saurabh ; Mitchell, James E. ; O'Rourke, Robert W. ; Pories, Walter ; Schrope, Beth ; Wolfe, Bruce. / Reporting weight change : Standardized reporting accounting for baseline weight. In: Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases. 2013 ; Vol. 9, No. 5. pp. 782-789.
@article{7468b783a28847448183f06926d9d9dd,
title = "Reporting weight change: Standardized reporting accounting for baseline weight",
abstract = "Background: Although it is recognized that a standardized approach to reporting weight change is essential to meaningful comparisons among cohorts and across studies, consensus is lacking. This study aimed to propose a method of reporting weight change that would allow meaningful comparisons among studies of patients who underwent bariatric surgery and to demonstrate its utility using an example from the Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS). Methods: Relationships among several measures of weight change are described. Results from an observational, longitudinal cohort study of adults undergoing bariatric surgery and from simulation studies are used to illustrate the proposed method. Results: Baseline weight is a critical parameter when assessing weight change. Men undergoing a bariatric procedure other than gastric bypass or adjustable band tended to have greater weight loss 12 months after surgery than men undergoing gastric bypass when not accounting for baseline weight, but the opposite was found when results were adjusted for baseline weight. Simulation results show that with relatively modest sample sizes, the adjusted weight loss was significantly different between the 2 groups of men. Conclusion: A consistent metric for reporting weight loss after bariatric surgery is essential to interpret outcomes across studies and among subgroups. The baseline weight adjusted percent of weight loss (A{\%}WL) uses a standard population (e.g., the LABS cohort) to account for differences between cohorts with respect to baseline weight, and its use can change the interpretation of results compared with an unadjusted measure.",
keywords = "Bariatric surgery, Obesity, Weight change",
author = "Belle, {Steven H.} and Berk, {Paul D.} and Courcoulas, {Anita P.} and Scott Engel and Flum, {David R.} and William Gourash and Mary Horlick and Hsu, {Jesse Y.} and Saurabh Khandelwal and Mitchell, {James E.} and O'Rourke, {Robert W.} and Walter Pories and Beth Schrope and Bruce Wolfe",
year = "2013",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.soard.2012.11.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "9",
pages = "782--789",
journal = "Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases",
issn = "1550-7289",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reporting weight change

T2 - Standardized reporting accounting for baseline weight

AU - Belle, Steven H.

AU - Berk, Paul D.

AU - Courcoulas, Anita P.

AU - Engel, Scott

AU - Flum, David R.

AU - Gourash, William

AU - Horlick, Mary

AU - Hsu, Jesse Y.

AU - Khandelwal, Saurabh

AU - Mitchell, James E.

AU - O'Rourke, Robert W.

AU - Pories, Walter

AU - Schrope, Beth

AU - Wolfe, Bruce

PY - 2013/9

Y1 - 2013/9

N2 - Background: Although it is recognized that a standardized approach to reporting weight change is essential to meaningful comparisons among cohorts and across studies, consensus is lacking. This study aimed to propose a method of reporting weight change that would allow meaningful comparisons among studies of patients who underwent bariatric surgery and to demonstrate its utility using an example from the Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS). Methods: Relationships among several measures of weight change are described. Results from an observational, longitudinal cohort study of adults undergoing bariatric surgery and from simulation studies are used to illustrate the proposed method. Results: Baseline weight is a critical parameter when assessing weight change. Men undergoing a bariatric procedure other than gastric bypass or adjustable band tended to have greater weight loss 12 months after surgery than men undergoing gastric bypass when not accounting for baseline weight, but the opposite was found when results were adjusted for baseline weight. Simulation results show that with relatively modest sample sizes, the adjusted weight loss was significantly different between the 2 groups of men. Conclusion: A consistent metric for reporting weight loss after bariatric surgery is essential to interpret outcomes across studies and among subgroups. The baseline weight adjusted percent of weight loss (A%WL) uses a standard population (e.g., the LABS cohort) to account for differences between cohorts with respect to baseline weight, and its use can change the interpretation of results compared with an unadjusted measure.

AB - Background: Although it is recognized that a standardized approach to reporting weight change is essential to meaningful comparisons among cohorts and across studies, consensus is lacking. This study aimed to propose a method of reporting weight change that would allow meaningful comparisons among studies of patients who underwent bariatric surgery and to demonstrate its utility using an example from the Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (LABS). Methods: Relationships among several measures of weight change are described. Results from an observational, longitudinal cohort study of adults undergoing bariatric surgery and from simulation studies are used to illustrate the proposed method. Results: Baseline weight is a critical parameter when assessing weight change. Men undergoing a bariatric procedure other than gastric bypass or adjustable band tended to have greater weight loss 12 months after surgery than men undergoing gastric bypass when not accounting for baseline weight, but the opposite was found when results were adjusted for baseline weight. Simulation results show that with relatively modest sample sizes, the adjusted weight loss was significantly different between the 2 groups of men. Conclusion: A consistent metric for reporting weight loss after bariatric surgery is essential to interpret outcomes across studies and among subgroups. The baseline weight adjusted percent of weight loss (A%WL) uses a standard population (e.g., the LABS cohort) to account for differences between cohorts with respect to baseline weight, and its use can change the interpretation of results compared with an unadjusted measure.

KW - Bariatric surgery

KW - Obesity

KW - Weight change

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84885035012&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84885035012&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.soard.2012.11.006

DO - 10.1016/j.soard.2012.11.006

M3 - Article

VL - 9

SP - 782

EP - 789

JO - Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases

JF - Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases

SN - 1550-7289

IS - 5

ER -