Reporting results of laparoscopic procedures: The state-wide registry approach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

The rapid development of technology facilitating minimally invasive surgery has challenged the surgical community to evaluate the safety and efficacy of these new techniques even as they were being widely utilized. The publication of retrospective series in a few institutions was followed by widespread adoption of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and subsequent reports of increased complications from the procedure. Other laparoscopic procedures such as antireflux operations and colectomy for cancer require greater technical skill and hold potential for significant morbidity. Because a prospective, randomized clinical trial is unlikely for these procedures, other measures of results need to be examined. A state registry is one such outcome study to be considered. In the state of Oregon we designed and implemented a voluntary registry program for these advanced procedures. Although the antireflux procedures are apparently being done safely, conclusions that can be drawn from such a registry are limited because of incomplete data collection. For a registry to be maximally effective, an automatic method of data accumulation is needed that will capture all cases that are done as well as follow-up information.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)623-630
Number of pages8
JournalSurgical Clinics of North America
Volume76
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1996

    Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this