Reporting on the Strategies Needed to Implement Proven Interventions: An Example From a "Real-World" Cross-Setting Implementation Study

Rachel Gold, Arwen E. Bunce, Deborah Cohen, Celine Hollombe, Christine A. Nelson, Enola K. Proctor, Jill A. Pope, Jennifer Devoe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The objective of this study was to empirically demonstrate the use of a new framework for describing the strategies used to implement quality improvement interventions and provide an example that others may follow. Implementation strategies are the specific approaches, methods, structures, and resources used to introduce and encourage uptake of a given intervention's components. Such strategies have not been regularly reported in descriptions of interventions' effectiveness, or in assessments of how proven interventions are implemented in new settings. This lack of reporting may hinder efforts to successfully translate effective interventions into "real-world" practice. A recently published framework was designed to standardize reporting on implementation strategies in the implementation science literature. We applied this framework to describe the strategies used to implement a single intervention in its original commercial care setting, and when implemented in community health centers from September 2010 through May 2015. Per this framework, the target (clinic staff) and outcome (prescribing rates) remained the same across settings; the actor, action, temporality, and dose were adapted to fit local context. The framework proved helpful in articulating which of the implementation strategies were kept constant and which were tailored to fit diverse settings, and simplified our reporting of their effects. Researchers should consider consistently reporting this information, which could be crucial to the success or failure of implementing proven interventions effectively across diverse care settings. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02299791.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalMayo Clinic Proceedings
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2016

Fingerprint

Medicine in Literature
Community Health Centers
Quality Improvement
Research Personnel

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Reporting on the Strategies Needed to Implement Proven Interventions : An Example From a "Real-World" Cross-Setting Implementation Study. / Gold, Rachel; Bunce, Arwen E.; Cohen, Deborah; Hollombe, Celine; Nelson, Christine A.; Proctor, Enola K.; Pope, Jill A.; Devoe, Jennifer.

In: Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 2016.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{81563357d971463da042e2de79fea805,
title = "Reporting on the Strategies Needed to Implement Proven Interventions: An Example From a {"}Real-World{"} Cross-Setting Implementation Study",
abstract = "The objective of this study was to empirically demonstrate the use of a new framework for describing the strategies used to implement quality improvement interventions and provide an example that others may follow. Implementation strategies are the specific approaches, methods, structures, and resources used to introduce and encourage uptake of a given intervention's components. Such strategies have not been regularly reported in descriptions of interventions' effectiveness, or in assessments of how proven interventions are implemented in new settings. This lack of reporting may hinder efforts to successfully translate effective interventions into {"}real-world{"} practice. A recently published framework was designed to standardize reporting on implementation strategies in the implementation science literature. We applied this framework to describe the strategies used to implement a single intervention in its original commercial care setting, and when implemented in community health centers from September 2010 through May 2015. Per this framework, the target (clinic staff) and outcome (prescribing rates) remained the same across settings; the actor, action, temporality, and dose were adapted to fit local context. The framework proved helpful in articulating which of the implementation strategies were kept constant and which were tailored to fit diverse settings, and simplified our reporting of their effects. Researchers should consider consistently reporting this information, which could be crucial to the success or failure of implementing proven interventions effectively across diverse care settings. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02299791.",
author = "Rachel Gold and Bunce, {Arwen E.} and Deborah Cohen and Celine Hollombe and Nelson, {Christine A.} and Proctor, {Enola K.} and Pope, {Jill A.} and Jennifer Devoe",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.03.014",
language = "English (US)",
journal = "Mayo Clinic Proceedings",
issn = "0025-6196",
publisher = "Elsevier Science",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reporting on the Strategies Needed to Implement Proven Interventions

T2 - An Example From a "Real-World" Cross-Setting Implementation Study

AU - Gold, Rachel

AU - Bunce, Arwen E.

AU - Cohen, Deborah

AU - Hollombe, Celine

AU - Nelson, Christine A.

AU - Proctor, Enola K.

AU - Pope, Jill A.

AU - Devoe, Jennifer

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The objective of this study was to empirically demonstrate the use of a new framework for describing the strategies used to implement quality improvement interventions and provide an example that others may follow. Implementation strategies are the specific approaches, methods, structures, and resources used to introduce and encourage uptake of a given intervention's components. Such strategies have not been regularly reported in descriptions of interventions' effectiveness, or in assessments of how proven interventions are implemented in new settings. This lack of reporting may hinder efforts to successfully translate effective interventions into "real-world" practice. A recently published framework was designed to standardize reporting on implementation strategies in the implementation science literature. We applied this framework to describe the strategies used to implement a single intervention in its original commercial care setting, and when implemented in community health centers from September 2010 through May 2015. Per this framework, the target (clinic staff) and outcome (prescribing rates) remained the same across settings; the actor, action, temporality, and dose were adapted to fit local context. The framework proved helpful in articulating which of the implementation strategies were kept constant and which were tailored to fit diverse settings, and simplified our reporting of their effects. Researchers should consider consistently reporting this information, which could be crucial to the success or failure of implementing proven interventions effectively across diverse care settings. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02299791.

AB - The objective of this study was to empirically demonstrate the use of a new framework for describing the strategies used to implement quality improvement interventions and provide an example that others may follow. Implementation strategies are the specific approaches, methods, structures, and resources used to introduce and encourage uptake of a given intervention's components. Such strategies have not been regularly reported in descriptions of interventions' effectiveness, or in assessments of how proven interventions are implemented in new settings. This lack of reporting may hinder efforts to successfully translate effective interventions into "real-world" practice. A recently published framework was designed to standardize reporting on implementation strategies in the implementation science literature. We applied this framework to describe the strategies used to implement a single intervention in its original commercial care setting, and when implemented in community health centers from September 2010 through May 2015. Per this framework, the target (clinic staff) and outcome (prescribing rates) remained the same across settings; the actor, action, temporality, and dose were adapted to fit local context. The framework proved helpful in articulating which of the implementation strategies were kept constant and which were tailored to fit diverse settings, and simplified our reporting of their effects. Researchers should consider consistently reporting this information, which could be crucial to the success or failure of implementing proven interventions effectively across diverse care settings. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02299791.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964613515&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964613515&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.03.014

DO - 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.03.014

M3 - Article

C2 - 27113199

AN - SCOPUS:84964613515

JO - Mayo Clinic Proceedings

JF - Mayo Clinic Proceedings

SN - 0025-6196

ER -