Report of the CIMERC*/Drexel University Emergency Department Terrorism Preparedness Consensus Panel

Michael I. Greenberg, Robert Hendrickson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This report describes the consensus recommendations of an expert panel convened to develop recommendations for a hospital-based emergency department (ED) to attain a minimal level of preparedness necessary to respond to mass casualty events derived from the use of weapons of mass destruction. The recommendations were created for use by hospital-based EDs of a variety of sizes and locations (urban, suburban, or rural). The disasters that were considered included those that are biological, chemical, or radiological. The panel focused on preparation for a single disaster that could generate 250-500 total patients in 24-48 hours. This number included asymptomatic, exposed, and symptomatic patients. The panel chose not to address circumstances where a small number of patients with an infectious disease are seen in one or a few hospitals. In addition, the panel believed that preparation of a single hospital for an overwhelming mass casualty situation (e.g., 10,000 patients) would not be broadly applicable and would not be required for an individual ED to "minimally prepared." Prior to the convening of this consensus panel, in June 2002, a search of all relevant agencies found no comprehensive, published, validated recommendations for preparedness for individual EDs. Although several agencies had released information on disaster management, clinical diagnosis and treatment tools, and training, no agency had produced a comprehensive list of items and issues that individual EDs must consider when preparing for a terrorist attack. The current report attempts to fill this void in information regarding ED preparedness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)783-788
Number of pages6
JournalAcademic Emergency Medicine
Volume10
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2003

Fingerprint

Terrorism
Hospital Emergency Service
Disasters
Mass Casualty Incidents
Weapons of Mass Destruction
Civil Defense
Communicable Diseases

Keywords

  • Disaster preparedness
  • Emergency departments
  • Mass casualty incidents
  • Recommendations
  • Terrorism
  • Weapons of mass destruction

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this

Report of the CIMERC*/Drexel University Emergency Department Terrorism Preparedness Consensus Panel. / Greenberg, Michael I.; Hendrickson, Robert.

In: Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol. 10, No. 7, 01.07.2003, p. 783-788.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{151505d77f9d4822a5e58e0334953d23,
title = "Report of the CIMERC*/Drexel University Emergency Department Terrorism Preparedness Consensus Panel",
abstract = "This report describes the consensus recommendations of an expert panel convened to develop recommendations for a hospital-based emergency department (ED) to attain a minimal level of preparedness necessary to respond to mass casualty events derived from the use of weapons of mass destruction. The recommendations were created for use by hospital-based EDs of a variety of sizes and locations (urban, suburban, or rural). The disasters that were considered included those that are biological, chemical, or radiological. The panel focused on preparation for a single disaster that could generate 250-500 total patients in 24-48 hours. This number included asymptomatic, exposed, and symptomatic patients. The panel chose not to address circumstances where a small number of patients with an infectious disease are seen in one or a few hospitals. In addition, the panel believed that preparation of a single hospital for an overwhelming mass casualty situation (e.g., 10,000 patients) would not be broadly applicable and would not be required for an individual ED to {"}minimally prepared.{"} Prior to the convening of this consensus panel, in June 2002, a search of all relevant agencies found no comprehensive, published, validated recommendations for preparedness for individual EDs. Although several agencies had released information on disaster management, clinical diagnosis and treatment tools, and training, no agency had produced a comprehensive list of items and issues that individual EDs must consider when preparing for a terrorist attack. The current report attempts to fill this void in information regarding ED preparedness.",
keywords = "Disaster preparedness, Emergency departments, Mass casualty incidents, Recommendations, Terrorism, Weapons of mass destruction",
author = "Greenberg, {Michael I.} and Robert Hendrickson",
year = "2003",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1197/aemj.10.7.783",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "783--788",
journal = "Academic Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1069-6563",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "7",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Report of the CIMERC*/Drexel University Emergency Department Terrorism Preparedness Consensus Panel

AU - Greenberg, Michael I.

AU - Hendrickson, Robert

PY - 2003/7/1

Y1 - 2003/7/1

N2 - This report describes the consensus recommendations of an expert panel convened to develop recommendations for a hospital-based emergency department (ED) to attain a minimal level of preparedness necessary to respond to mass casualty events derived from the use of weapons of mass destruction. The recommendations were created for use by hospital-based EDs of a variety of sizes and locations (urban, suburban, or rural). The disasters that were considered included those that are biological, chemical, or radiological. The panel focused on preparation for a single disaster that could generate 250-500 total patients in 24-48 hours. This number included asymptomatic, exposed, and symptomatic patients. The panel chose not to address circumstances where a small number of patients with an infectious disease are seen in one or a few hospitals. In addition, the panel believed that preparation of a single hospital for an overwhelming mass casualty situation (e.g., 10,000 patients) would not be broadly applicable and would not be required for an individual ED to "minimally prepared." Prior to the convening of this consensus panel, in June 2002, a search of all relevant agencies found no comprehensive, published, validated recommendations for preparedness for individual EDs. Although several agencies had released information on disaster management, clinical diagnosis and treatment tools, and training, no agency had produced a comprehensive list of items and issues that individual EDs must consider when preparing for a terrorist attack. The current report attempts to fill this void in information regarding ED preparedness.

AB - This report describes the consensus recommendations of an expert panel convened to develop recommendations for a hospital-based emergency department (ED) to attain a minimal level of preparedness necessary to respond to mass casualty events derived from the use of weapons of mass destruction. The recommendations were created for use by hospital-based EDs of a variety of sizes and locations (urban, suburban, or rural). The disasters that were considered included those that are biological, chemical, or radiological. The panel focused on preparation for a single disaster that could generate 250-500 total patients in 24-48 hours. This number included asymptomatic, exposed, and symptomatic patients. The panel chose not to address circumstances where a small number of patients with an infectious disease are seen in one or a few hospitals. In addition, the panel believed that preparation of a single hospital for an overwhelming mass casualty situation (e.g., 10,000 patients) would not be broadly applicable and would not be required for an individual ED to "minimally prepared." Prior to the convening of this consensus panel, in June 2002, a search of all relevant agencies found no comprehensive, published, validated recommendations for preparedness for individual EDs. Although several agencies had released information on disaster management, clinical diagnosis and treatment tools, and training, no agency had produced a comprehensive list of items and issues that individual EDs must consider when preparing for a terrorist attack. The current report attempts to fill this void in information regarding ED preparedness.

KW - Disaster preparedness

KW - Emergency departments

KW - Mass casualty incidents

KW - Recommendations

KW - Terrorism

KW - Weapons of mass destruction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0037480261&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0037480261&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1197/aemj.10.7.783

DO - 10.1197/aemj.10.7.783

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 783

EP - 788

JO - Academic Emergency Medicine

JF - Academic Emergency Medicine

SN - 1069-6563

IS - 7

ER -