Religion and spirituality after trauma

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

INTERNATIONAL CONCERNS ABOUT PTSD In recent years, Western concepts of psychological trauma have come under increasing challenge, particularly from a transcultural perspective (see Silove, 1999a). The evolving critique is based on several loosely interrelated assertions (Summerfield, 1999): that the psychiatric category posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has its roots in the historical and social imperatives of the 1970s when there was a need to vindicate and advocate for Vietnam combat veterans returning to a hostile public reception in the USA; that, in turn, the medicalization of PTSD spawned a self-sustaining and self-serving trauma counseling industry; and that the consequences, intentional or otherwise, have been to encourage a culture of victimization, compensation seeking, and unrealistic expectations. Concerns have been raised, in particular, about the proliferation of psychological debriefing after disasters, in spite of mounting evidence that indiscriminate interventions of that type may be ineffective, and in some cases injurious, to natural recovery (Raphael & Wilson, 2000). The added concern is that the professional appropriation of psychological trauma may undermine communal support mechanisms that traditionally provided comfort to survivors. Such concerns are particularly relevant to conflict-affected countries that lack the resources and skills to apply best practice treatments for PTSD. Issues of feasibility and affordability make it impossible to offer best practice interventions (whether pharmacological or cognitive behavioral) on a mass scale to the large portion of trauma-affected populations meeting criteria for PTSD soon after major humanitarian disasters.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationUnderstanding Trauma: Integrating Biological, Clinical, and Cultural Perspectives
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages259-274
Number of pages16
ISBN (Print)9780511500008, 0521854288, 9780521854283
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2007

Fingerprint

Spirituality
Religion
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorders
Wounds and Injuries
Disasters
Practice Guidelines
Medicalization
Crime Victims
Vietnam
Veterans
Psychiatry
Survivors
Counseling
Industry
Pharmacology
Psychology
Population

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Boehnlein, J. (2007). Religion and spirituality after trauma. In Understanding Trauma: Integrating Biological, Clinical, and Cultural Perspectives (pp. 259-274). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511500008.016

Religion and spirituality after trauma. / Boehnlein, James.

Understanding Trauma: Integrating Biological, Clinical, and Cultural Perspectives. Cambridge University Press, 2007. p. 259-274.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Boehnlein, J 2007, Religion and spirituality after trauma. in Understanding Trauma: Integrating Biological, Clinical, and Cultural Perspectives. Cambridge University Press, pp. 259-274. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511500008.016
Boehnlein J. Religion and spirituality after trauma. In Understanding Trauma: Integrating Biological, Clinical, and Cultural Perspectives. Cambridge University Press. 2007. p. 259-274 https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511500008.016
Boehnlein, James. / Religion and spirituality after trauma. Understanding Trauma: Integrating Biological, Clinical, and Cultural Perspectives. Cambridge University Press, 2007. pp. 259-274
@inbook{b3705ee60a05422086e5a1fd6d4ac25a,
title = "Religion and spirituality after trauma",
abstract = "INTERNATIONAL CONCERNS ABOUT PTSD In recent years, Western concepts of psychological trauma have come under increasing challenge, particularly from a transcultural perspective (see Silove, 1999a). The evolving critique is based on several loosely interrelated assertions (Summerfield, 1999): that the psychiatric category posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has its roots in the historical and social imperatives of the 1970s when there was a need to vindicate and advocate for Vietnam combat veterans returning to a hostile public reception in the USA; that, in turn, the medicalization of PTSD spawned a self-sustaining and self-serving trauma counseling industry; and that the consequences, intentional or otherwise, have been to encourage a culture of victimization, compensation seeking, and unrealistic expectations. Concerns have been raised, in particular, about the proliferation of psychological debriefing after disasters, in spite of mounting evidence that indiscriminate interventions of that type may be ineffective, and in some cases injurious, to natural recovery (Raphael & Wilson, 2000). The added concern is that the professional appropriation of psychological trauma may undermine communal support mechanisms that traditionally provided comfort to survivors. Such concerns are particularly relevant to conflict-affected countries that lack the resources and skills to apply best practice treatments for PTSD. Issues of feasibility and affordability make it impossible to offer best practice interventions (whether pharmacological or cognitive behavioral) on a mass scale to the large portion of trauma-affected populations meeting criteria for PTSD soon after major humanitarian disasters.",
author = "James Boehnlein",
year = "2007",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1017/CBO9780511500008.016",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780511500008",
pages = "259--274",
booktitle = "Understanding Trauma: Integrating Biological, Clinical, and Cultural Perspectives",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - Religion and spirituality after trauma

AU - Boehnlein, James

PY - 2007/1/1

Y1 - 2007/1/1

N2 - INTERNATIONAL CONCERNS ABOUT PTSD In recent years, Western concepts of psychological trauma have come under increasing challenge, particularly from a transcultural perspective (see Silove, 1999a). The evolving critique is based on several loosely interrelated assertions (Summerfield, 1999): that the psychiatric category posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has its roots in the historical and social imperatives of the 1970s when there was a need to vindicate and advocate for Vietnam combat veterans returning to a hostile public reception in the USA; that, in turn, the medicalization of PTSD spawned a self-sustaining and self-serving trauma counseling industry; and that the consequences, intentional or otherwise, have been to encourage a culture of victimization, compensation seeking, and unrealistic expectations. Concerns have been raised, in particular, about the proliferation of psychological debriefing after disasters, in spite of mounting evidence that indiscriminate interventions of that type may be ineffective, and in some cases injurious, to natural recovery (Raphael & Wilson, 2000). The added concern is that the professional appropriation of psychological trauma may undermine communal support mechanisms that traditionally provided comfort to survivors. Such concerns are particularly relevant to conflict-affected countries that lack the resources and skills to apply best practice treatments for PTSD. Issues of feasibility and affordability make it impossible to offer best practice interventions (whether pharmacological or cognitive behavioral) on a mass scale to the large portion of trauma-affected populations meeting criteria for PTSD soon after major humanitarian disasters.

AB - INTERNATIONAL CONCERNS ABOUT PTSD In recent years, Western concepts of psychological trauma have come under increasing challenge, particularly from a transcultural perspective (see Silove, 1999a). The evolving critique is based on several loosely interrelated assertions (Summerfield, 1999): that the psychiatric category posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has its roots in the historical and social imperatives of the 1970s when there was a need to vindicate and advocate for Vietnam combat veterans returning to a hostile public reception in the USA; that, in turn, the medicalization of PTSD spawned a self-sustaining and self-serving trauma counseling industry; and that the consequences, intentional or otherwise, have been to encourage a culture of victimization, compensation seeking, and unrealistic expectations. Concerns have been raised, in particular, about the proliferation of psychological debriefing after disasters, in spite of mounting evidence that indiscriminate interventions of that type may be ineffective, and in some cases injurious, to natural recovery (Raphael & Wilson, 2000). The added concern is that the professional appropriation of psychological trauma may undermine communal support mechanisms that traditionally provided comfort to survivors. Such concerns are particularly relevant to conflict-affected countries that lack the resources and skills to apply best practice treatments for PTSD. Issues of feasibility and affordability make it impossible to offer best practice interventions (whether pharmacological or cognitive behavioral) on a mass scale to the large portion of trauma-affected populations meeting criteria for PTSD soon after major humanitarian disasters.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84928852349&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84928852349&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1017/CBO9780511500008.016

DO - 10.1017/CBO9780511500008.016

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9780511500008

SN - 0521854288

SN - 9780521854283

SP - 259

EP - 274

BT - Understanding Trauma: Integrating Biological, Clinical, and Cultural Perspectives

PB - Cambridge University Press

ER -