Reliability of spectral-domain OCT ellipsoid zone area and shape measurements in retinitis pigmentosa

Travis Smith, Maria Parker, Peter N. Steinkamp, Albert Romo, Laura Erker, Brandon Lujan, Ning Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Purpose: We investigate the ellipsoid zone (EZ) area and EZ boundary shape measurement reliability and the operability characteristics of two methods of EZ boundary delineation in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Methods: EZ boundaries in SD-OCT scans of 122 eyes from 64 subjects with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa were delineated by three raters using two methods, termed the profile and en face methods. For each method, we determined the measurement reliabilities for boundary area (EZ area) and boundary shape, percentage of eyes with measurable EZ (measurability), time required, and effect of rater experience. Results: With expert raters, interand intrarater area intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were 0.986 and 0.980 (profile) and 0.959 and 0.976 (en face), respectively. In comparison, the corresponding shape ICCs were 0.906 and 0.891 (profile) and 0.845 and 0.885 (en face), indicating lower reliability for the raw measurements (P ≤ 0.01). Only profile method interrater reliability depended on experience. Average measurement times per eye were 8.2 (profile) and 4.1 (en face) minutes. Measurability percentages were 99.2% (profile) and 73.0% (en face). Conclusions: The slower profile method had better measurability, and with expert raters yielded the best area and shape reliabilities. The faster, but less sensitive, en face method still showed excellent reliability, and was less dependent on experience. Shape analysis reveals the boundary measurements underpinning EZ area have lower reliability than suggested by area analysis. Translational Relevance: This study provides new reliability perspectives and logistical considerations for the manual measurement procedures that generate EZ area outcome measures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number37
JournalTranslational Vision Science and Technology
Volume8
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2019

Fingerprint

Retinitis Pigmentosa
Optical tomography
Optical Coherence Tomography
Time measurement
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)

Keywords

  • Ellipsoid zone
  • Optical coherence tomography
  • Reliability
  • Retina
  • Shape

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Ophthalmology

Cite this

Reliability of spectral-domain OCT ellipsoid zone area and shape measurements in retinitis pigmentosa. / Smith, Travis; Parker, Maria; Steinkamp, Peter N.; Romo, Albert; Erker, Laura; Lujan, Brandon; Smith, Ning.

In: Translational Vision Science and Technology, Vol. 8, No. 3, 37, 01.05.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{1e378360841a4760a1e2064ec1043956,
title = "Reliability of spectral-domain OCT ellipsoid zone area and shape measurements in retinitis pigmentosa",
abstract = "Purpose: We investigate the ellipsoid zone (EZ) area and EZ boundary shape measurement reliability and the operability characteristics of two methods of EZ boundary delineation in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Methods: EZ boundaries in SD-OCT scans of 122 eyes from 64 subjects with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa were delineated by three raters using two methods, termed the profile and en face methods. For each method, we determined the measurement reliabilities for boundary area (EZ area) and boundary shape, percentage of eyes with measurable EZ (measurability), time required, and effect of rater experience. Results: With expert raters, interand intrarater area intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were 0.986 and 0.980 (profile) and 0.959 and 0.976 (en face), respectively. In comparison, the corresponding shape ICCs were 0.906 and 0.891 (profile) and 0.845 and 0.885 (en face), indicating lower reliability for the raw measurements (P ≤ 0.01). Only profile method interrater reliability depended on experience. Average measurement times per eye were 8.2 (profile) and 4.1 (en face) minutes. Measurability percentages were 99.2{\%} (profile) and 73.0{\%} (en face). Conclusions: The slower profile method had better measurability, and with expert raters yielded the best area and shape reliabilities. The faster, but less sensitive, en face method still showed excellent reliability, and was less dependent on experience. Shape analysis reveals the boundary measurements underpinning EZ area have lower reliability than suggested by area analysis. Translational Relevance: This study provides new reliability perspectives and logistical considerations for the manual measurement procedures that generate EZ area outcome measures.",
keywords = "Ellipsoid zone, Optical coherence tomography, Reliability, Retina, Shape",
author = "Travis Smith and Maria Parker and Steinkamp, {Peter N.} and Albert Romo and Laura Erker and Brandon Lujan and Ning Smith",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1167/tvst.8.3.37",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "8",
journal = "Translational Vision Science and Technology",
issn = "2164-2591",
publisher = "Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology Inc.",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability of spectral-domain OCT ellipsoid zone area and shape measurements in retinitis pigmentosa

AU - Smith, Travis

AU - Parker, Maria

AU - Steinkamp, Peter N.

AU - Romo, Albert

AU - Erker, Laura

AU - Lujan, Brandon

AU - Smith, Ning

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - Purpose: We investigate the ellipsoid zone (EZ) area and EZ boundary shape measurement reliability and the operability characteristics of two methods of EZ boundary delineation in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Methods: EZ boundaries in SD-OCT scans of 122 eyes from 64 subjects with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa were delineated by three raters using two methods, termed the profile and en face methods. For each method, we determined the measurement reliabilities for boundary area (EZ area) and boundary shape, percentage of eyes with measurable EZ (measurability), time required, and effect of rater experience. Results: With expert raters, interand intrarater area intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were 0.986 and 0.980 (profile) and 0.959 and 0.976 (en face), respectively. In comparison, the corresponding shape ICCs were 0.906 and 0.891 (profile) and 0.845 and 0.885 (en face), indicating lower reliability for the raw measurements (P ≤ 0.01). Only profile method interrater reliability depended on experience. Average measurement times per eye were 8.2 (profile) and 4.1 (en face) minutes. Measurability percentages were 99.2% (profile) and 73.0% (en face). Conclusions: The slower profile method had better measurability, and with expert raters yielded the best area and shape reliabilities. The faster, but less sensitive, en face method still showed excellent reliability, and was less dependent on experience. Shape analysis reveals the boundary measurements underpinning EZ area have lower reliability than suggested by area analysis. Translational Relevance: This study provides new reliability perspectives and logistical considerations for the manual measurement procedures that generate EZ area outcome measures.

AB - Purpose: We investigate the ellipsoid zone (EZ) area and EZ boundary shape measurement reliability and the operability characteristics of two methods of EZ boundary delineation in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Methods: EZ boundaries in SD-OCT scans of 122 eyes from 64 subjects with autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa were delineated by three raters using two methods, termed the profile and en face methods. For each method, we determined the measurement reliabilities for boundary area (EZ area) and boundary shape, percentage of eyes with measurable EZ (measurability), time required, and effect of rater experience. Results: With expert raters, interand intrarater area intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were 0.986 and 0.980 (profile) and 0.959 and 0.976 (en face), respectively. In comparison, the corresponding shape ICCs were 0.906 and 0.891 (profile) and 0.845 and 0.885 (en face), indicating lower reliability for the raw measurements (P ≤ 0.01). Only profile method interrater reliability depended on experience. Average measurement times per eye were 8.2 (profile) and 4.1 (en face) minutes. Measurability percentages were 99.2% (profile) and 73.0% (en face). Conclusions: The slower profile method had better measurability, and with expert raters yielded the best area and shape reliabilities. The faster, but less sensitive, en face method still showed excellent reliability, and was less dependent on experience. Shape analysis reveals the boundary measurements underpinning EZ area have lower reliability than suggested by area analysis. Translational Relevance: This study provides new reliability perspectives and logistical considerations for the manual measurement procedures that generate EZ area outcome measures.

KW - Ellipsoid zone

KW - Optical coherence tomography

KW - Reliability

KW - Retina

KW - Shape

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85070281424&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85070281424&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1167/tvst.8.3.37

DO - 10.1167/tvst.8.3.37

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85070281424

VL - 8

JO - Translational Vision Science and Technology

JF - Translational Vision Science and Technology

SN - 2164-2591

IS - 3

M1 - 37

ER -