Reliability of computer-automated hearing thresholds in cochlear-impaired listeners using ER-4B canal phone™ earphones

James Henry, Christopher L. Flick, Alison Gilbert, Roger M. Ellingson, Stephen A. Fausti

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper describes the second phase of a study to determine test-retest reliability of hearing thresholds using a computer-automated technique with ER-4B Canal Phone™ insert earphones. The first phase documented reliable hearing thresholds in 20 normal-hearing individuals. For this second phase, 20 individuals with cochlear hearing loss completed the same testing protocol as for phase one. During each of two sessions, hearing thresholds were obtained in one-third octave steps at 500 Hz to 16,000 Hz. The octave frequencies were immediately retested, followed by ear-tip reinsertion and further retesting at octave frequencies. Both groups showed over all good threshold reliability, with observable differences between groups. First, repeated testing resulted in improved hearing thresholds for the normal-hearing group, but not for the cochlear-loss group. Second, the normal-hearing group showed overall better response reliability, both within and between sessions, than the cochlear-loss group. These differences were small but consistent.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)253-264
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Rehabilitation Research and Development
Volume40
Issue number3
StatePublished - May 2003

Fingerprint

Earphones
Cochlea
Audition
Canals
Hearing
Sensorineural Hearing Loss
Reproducibility of Results
Testing
Ear

Keywords

  • Auditory threshold
  • Hearing
  • Reliability of results

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Rehabilitation
  • Health Professions(all)
  • Engineering(all)

Cite this

Reliability of computer-automated hearing thresholds in cochlear-impaired listeners using ER-4B canal phone™ earphones. / Henry, James; Flick, Christopher L.; Gilbert, Alison; Ellingson, Roger M.; Fausti, Stephen A.

In: Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, Vol. 40, No. 3, 05.2003, p. 253-264.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Henry, James ; Flick, Christopher L. ; Gilbert, Alison ; Ellingson, Roger M. ; Fausti, Stephen A. / Reliability of computer-automated hearing thresholds in cochlear-impaired listeners using ER-4B canal phone™ earphones. In: Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 2003 ; Vol. 40, No. 3. pp. 253-264.
@article{6d0557bcb65f46eeae5b9b1eaea8bbad,
title = "Reliability of computer-automated hearing thresholds in cochlear-impaired listeners using ER-4B canal phone™ earphones",
abstract = "This paper describes the second phase of a study to determine test-retest reliability of hearing thresholds using a computer-automated technique with ER-4B Canal Phone™ insert earphones. The first phase documented reliable hearing thresholds in 20 normal-hearing individuals. For this second phase, 20 individuals with cochlear hearing loss completed the same testing protocol as for phase one. During each of two sessions, hearing thresholds were obtained in one-third octave steps at 500 Hz to 16,000 Hz. The octave frequencies were immediately retested, followed by ear-tip reinsertion and further retesting at octave frequencies. Both groups showed over all good threshold reliability, with observable differences between groups. First, repeated testing resulted in improved hearing thresholds for the normal-hearing group, but not for the cochlear-loss group. Second, the normal-hearing group showed overall better response reliability, both within and between sessions, than the cochlear-loss group. These differences were small but consistent.",
keywords = "Auditory threshold, Hearing, Reliability of results",
author = "James Henry and Flick, {Christopher L.} and Alison Gilbert and Ellingson, {Roger M.} and Fausti, {Stephen A.}",
year = "2003",
month = "5",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "40",
pages = "253--264",
journal = "Journal of rehabilitation R&D",
issn = "0007-506X",
publisher = "Department of Veterans Affairs",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability of computer-automated hearing thresholds in cochlear-impaired listeners using ER-4B canal phone™ earphones

AU - Henry, James

AU - Flick, Christopher L.

AU - Gilbert, Alison

AU - Ellingson, Roger M.

AU - Fausti, Stephen A.

PY - 2003/5

Y1 - 2003/5

N2 - This paper describes the second phase of a study to determine test-retest reliability of hearing thresholds using a computer-automated technique with ER-4B Canal Phone™ insert earphones. The first phase documented reliable hearing thresholds in 20 normal-hearing individuals. For this second phase, 20 individuals with cochlear hearing loss completed the same testing protocol as for phase one. During each of two sessions, hearing thresholds were obtained in one-third octave steps at 500 Hz to 16,000 Hz. The octave frequencies were immediately retested, followed by ear-tip reinsertion and further retesting at octave frequencies. Both groups showed over all good threshold reliability, with observable differences between groups. First, repeated testing resulted in improved hearing thresholds for the normal-hearing group, but not for the cochlear-loss group. Second, the normal-hearing group showed overall better response reliability, both within and between sessions, than the cochlear-loss group. These differences were small but consistent.

AB - This paper describes the second phase of a study to determine test-retest reliability of hearing thresholds using a computer-automated technique with ER-4B Canal Phone™ insert earphones. The first phase documented reliable hearing thresholds in 20 normal-hearing individuals. For this second phase, 20 individuals with cochlear hearing loss completed the same testing protocol as for phase one. During each of two sessions, hearing thresholds were obtained in one-third octave steps at 500 Hz to 16,000 Hz. The octave frequencies were immediately retested, followed by ear-tip reinsertion and further retesting at octave frequencies. Both groups showed over all good threshold reliability, with observable differences between groups. First, repeated testing resulted in improved hearing thresholds for the normal-hearing group, but not for the cochlear-loss group. Second, the normal-hearing group showed overall better response reliability, both within and between sessions, than the cochlear-loss group. These differences were small but consistent.

KW - Auditory threshold

KW - Hearing

KW - Reliability of results

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0038657834&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0038657834&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

C2 - 14582529

AN - SCOPUS:0038657834

VL - 40

SP - 253

EP - 264

JO - Journal of rehabilitation R&D

JF - Journal of rehabilitation R&D

SN - 0007-506X

IS - 3

ER -